Even just over a century ago, a diagnosis of diabetes was practically a death sentence. There was no treatment but to attempt to extend the survival of those afflicted via a so-called ‘starvation diet’; as a result, parents and doctors could do nothing but watch as their children and patients wasted away, succumbing to starvation, ketoacidosis, or to numerous other complications of diabetes such as heart disease, infections, and kidney failure. The discovery of insulin and its use in humans was revolutionary and has saved countless lives ever since that first fateful injection by Banting and Best in 1921. However, the basic science surrounding insulin at that time was rudimentary—it was not at all known what insulin even was, other than some mysterious glandular extract from Langerhans’ so-called ‘islets of cells’ in the pancreas, let alone how it worked. The first theory of the mechanism of action of insulin, put forth by Vilém Laufberger in 1924, was that insulin acted covalently on enzymes to directly block the process of gluconeogenesis and thereby prevented the body from producing excess glucose to circulate in the blood (1Laufberger W. Theorie der Insulinwirkung.Klin. Wochenschr. 1924; 3: 264-267Crossref Scopus (2) Google Scholar, 2Páv J. Skrha J. The development of theories on the mechanisms of insulin action.Cas. Lek. Cesk. 1990; 129: 1075-1079PubMed Google Scholar). This theory dominated the field for a number of years, and the established researchers took for granted that insulin and glucose were freely able to diffuse into cells. Around this time, Rachmiel Levine, a young Polish-born orphan, was denied a visa to enter the United States and instead emigrated to Canada (3A tribute to Rachmiel Levine: 1910-1998.Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 1781-1783Crossref Google Scholar). Levine later entered McGill University in Montreal, graduating with an MD in 1936, and interned at Michael Reese Hospital in Chicago before becoming the assistant director of their Department of Metabolic and Endocrine Research in 1939. He published several articles there with William Soskin on the relationship between blood-sugar levels and glucose utilization (4Soskin S. Levine R. A relationship between the blood sugar level and the rate of sugar utilization, affecting the theories of diabetes.Am. J. Physiol. 1937; 120: 761-770Crossref Google Scholar, 5Levine R. Cohn C. Soskin S. The influence of sugar and other metabolites on the respiratory exchange of eviscerated normal and deprancreatized dogs.Fed. Proc. 1946; 5: 62PubMed Google Scholar), as well as a book entitled “Carbohydrate Metabolism” (6Soskin S. Levine R. Carbohydrate Metabolism: Correlation of Physiological, Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago1947Google Scholar), cementing his research pedigree and his focus on the role of insulin. At the time, biological research on animals was less regulated, and not for the squeamish. The preferred diabetic animal model of choice was dogs in which the pancreas and kidneys had been removed, which mimicked the pathological conditions of human type I diabetes. Using this model, Levine et al. (7Levine R. Goldstein M. Klein S. Huddlestun B. The action of insulin on the distribution of galactose in eviscerated nephrectomized dogs.J. Biol. Chem. 1949; 179: 985-986Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) set out to discover the true mechanism of insulin action. By injecting these dogs with galactose, a hexose sugar similar to glucose but which is not readily metabolized in this model, they found that 45% to 47% of the galactose was taken up by cells into body tissues. However, upon coinjection of the same total amount of galactose along with insulin, the plasma levels of galactose were much lower. This result indicated that insulin prompted cells in body tissues to take up more of the galactose. Based on this finding, Levine et al. formulated the theory that made their careers, namely that insulin acted on the cell membrane to promote sugar uptake from the blood. This was eventually termed “the Levine effect,” and the publication of this finding in the JBC in 1949 (7Levine R. Goldstein M. Klein S. Huddlestun B. The action of insulin on the distribution of galactose in eviscerated nephrectomized dogs.J. Biol. Chem. 1949; 179: 985-986Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar) is generally recognized as the origin of his nickname, “the father of modern diabetes research” (Fig. 1). Levine’s transport theory was soon after confirmed using xylose and arabinose (8Goldstein M.S. Henry W.L. Huddlestun B. Levine R. Action of insulin on transfer of sugars across cell barriers: Common chemical configuration of substances responsive to action of the hormone.Am. J. Physiol. 1953; 173: 207-211Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar, 9Goldstein M.S. Mendel B. Levine R. Further observations on action of insulin on transfer of hexose across cell membranes: Relation to adrenal cortex.Am. J. Physiol. 1950; 163: 714Google Scholar, 10Levine R. Goldstein M.S. On the mechanism of action of insulin.Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 1955; 11: 343-380Google Scholar, 11Levine R. Goldstein M.S. Huddlestun B. Klein S. Action of insulin on the permeability of cells to free hexose, as studied by its effect on distribution of galactose.Am. J. Physiol. 1950; 163: 70-76Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar), as well as glucose (12Park C.R. Johnson L.H. Wright Jr., J.H. Batsel H. Effect of insulin on transport of several hexoses and pentoses into cells of muscle and brain.Am. J. Physiol. 1957; 191: 13-18Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar, 13Park C.R. Reinwein D. Henderson M.J. Cadenas E. Morgan H.E. The action of insulin on the transport of glucose through the cell membrane.Am. J. Med. 1959; 26: 674-684Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar), and in striated (14Haft D. Mirsky I.A. Perisutti G. Influence of insulin on uptake of monosaccharides by the isolated rat diaphragm.Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1953; 82: 60-62Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 15Kipnis D.M. Regulation of glucose uptake by muscle: Function and significance of permeability and phosphorylating activity.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1959; 82: 354-365Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar, 16Park C.R. Post R.L. Kalman C.F. Wright Jr., J.H. Johnson L.H. Morgan H.E. Wolstenholme G. E. W O’Connor C.M. Ciba Foundation Symposium-Internal Secretions of the Pancreas (Colloquia on Endocrinology). Novartis Foundation Symposia. vol. 9. Ciba Foundation Symposium, 1956: 240-259Google Scholar) and cardiac muscle cells (17Fisher R.B. Lindsay D.B. The action of insulin on the penetration of sugars into the perfused heart.J. Physiol. 1956; 131: 526-541Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 18Morgan H.E. Henderson M.J. Regan D.M. Park C.R. Regulation of glucose uptake in heart muscle from normal and alloxan-diabetic rats: The effects of insulin, growth hormone, cortisone, and anoxia.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1959; 82: 387-402Crossref PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar), fibroblasts (19Leslie I. Paul J. The action of insulin on the composition of cells and medium during culture of chick heart explants.J. Endocrinol. 1954; 11: 110-124Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar), and adipose tissue (20Crofford O.B. Renold A.E. Glucose uptake by incubated rat epididymal adipose tissue.J. Biol. Chem. 1965; 240: 14-21Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), thus generalizing the action of insulin on the uptake of sugars by many cell types. This work was followed by studies showing that insulin itself did not need to be taken up into cells to exert these effects, bucking the established theory of the day that that glucose and insulin could freely cross the cell membrane. It was clear that there was some mechanism or mechanisms that regulated and maintained the uptake and maintenance of hexose levels in cells, although it was not clear yet what this mechanism might be. While it did not account for many of the secondary actions of insulin (21Petersen M.C. Shulman G.I. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance.Physiol. Rev. 2018; 98: 2133-2223Crossref PubMed Scopus (610) Google Scholar), Levine’s theory of insulin working on cell membranes was a breakthrough in diabetes research. In subsequent years, many studies were published on the mechanism of insulin action, including the identification of the insulin receptor (22Haskell J.F. Meezan E. Pillion D.J. Identification and characterization of the insulin receptor of bovine retinal microvessels.Endocrinology. 1984; 115: 698-704Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar), which confirmed the extracellular role of insulin in mediating glucose uptake. Levine spent the next 45 years at Michael Reese and at the University of Chicago, then as a professor and chairman at New York Medical College, and finally at City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, California, publishing his research on diabetes and built their Diabetes Program. In 1978, he also encouraged two fellow researchers Arthur Riggs and Keiichi Itakura at City of Hope to genetically engineer Escherichia coli to produce human insulin (23Goeddel D.V. Kleid D.G. Bolivar F. Heyneker H.L. Yansura D.G. Crea R. Hirose T. Kraszewski A. Itakura K. Riggs A.D. Expression in Escherichia coli of chemically synthesized genes for human insulin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1979; 76: 106-110Crossref PubMed Scopus (544) Google Scholar); this led to the development of Humulin, the first genetically engineered health-care product approved by the Food and Drug Administration, which is still used today by millions of diabetics (https://www.cityofhope.org/research/levine-symposium/about-rachmiel-levine, accessed October 18, 2021). Looking back on the 1949 study covering just two pages in the JBC (7Levine R. Goldstein M. Klein S. Huddlestun B. The action of insulin on the distribution of galactose in eviscerated nephrectomized dogs.J. Biol. Chem. 1949; 179: 985-986Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar), it is truly amazing the wonders that would come from such a short experiment: a foundational discovery challenging the beliefs of the field, a lasting legacy of research integrity, and a namesake effect that cemented Rachmiel Levine as the true father of modern diabetes research.