Reviewed by: Becoming a Genuine Muslim: Kierkegaard and Muhammad Iqbal by Sevcan Ozturk Ronald F. Marshall Becoming a Genuine Muslim: Kierkegaard and Muhammad Iqbal. By Sevcan Ozturk. London and New York: Routledge, 2020. ix + 145 pp. Professor Ozturk, University of Ankara, Turkey, argues in her book that the thought of Søren Kierkegaard can help Muslims become more devout. She focuses on the Pakistani poet and philosopher, Muhammad Iqbal (1877–1938), for her understanding of Islam. She argues that Iqbal, while deftly identifying "the problems of the Muslim world of his day, … does not provide his readers with a clear idea of how to become a Muslim despite the fact that it is perhaps the core of his philosophical thought" (vi). Kierkegaard can help with this because what he found to be wrong with Christianity in his day—that Christians were "merely nominal" believers (46), having transformed the faith from "a way of life into merely a teaching and a doctrine" (25)—also was Iqbal's problem. Iqbal thought the lightning of God's wrath had fallen on "the hapless Muslims" (57) because of this failure. So whatever Kierkegaard can do to help, Ozturk believes Iqbal would have gladly welcomed. Ozturk argues that Kierkegaard's solution applies in Iqbal's case because they both faced "a parallel challenge" (46). His solution also works for Iqbal because Ozturk sees them both as "conservative religious personalities" (8). Kierkegaard can help Iqbal move from a too abstract viewpoint to a more concrete one. That concrete approach emphasizes prayer and love (100, 127, 132–33) as essential ingredients in transforming Muslims into more devout followers of Allah. For Kierkegaard, however, love and prayer only transform Christians because of the passion generated by their faith [End Page 80] in the paradox of the divine incarnation (128–29). Ozturk knows that Muslims cannot accept this paradox (129), but she still thinks Kierkegaard's solution is valuable. He can still "provide the basis of a hermeneutic that can be employed to identify and articulate the distinctive features of Iqbal's development of … his view of becoming a genuine Muslim" (46). But when the paradox is taken out of Kierkegaard's understanding of Christian transformation, it falters because it no longer crushes us in order to transform us. Ozturk knows this and rejects the idea that Muslim transformation needs to "negate" the self (66, 90). But Kierkegaard, contrary to Ozturk, insists that this attack on us is needed—which is "the deadliest danger" and hits us "like a sunstroke directly on the brain" (Journals, trans. Hongs, §4:4903). "Venture unconditionally to break with everything," Kierkegaard goes on to say, "in order to get a clear idea of what Christianity is, and you will find out that you yourself will become a Christian; … even though you were not one from the outset" (Journals, §4:4934). That is because "the less a person thinks of himself … with regard to [the increase of the acknowledgement of] his guilt, the more manifest God becomes to him" (Kierkegaard, Three Discourses on Imagined Occasions, 1845, trans. Hongs, p. 29). But this bumpy ride to authenticity is not for Ozturk. Not even the majority of Christians favor it. Kierkegaard probably learned it from Martin Luther—who stressed that "many tribulations" are needed if anyone is to make it into heaven (Luther's Works 31:33). Thinking our way into heaven will not work, says Luther, because reason is "wicked, blind, and foolish" (LW 27:57). But for Ozturk, Islam "stands in greater need of a rational foundation of its ultimate principles than even the dogmas of science" (102, 138). Ozturk's study is valuable for identifying the problem of personal transformation and the need for "extra effort" in bringing it about (126, 128). Would that she had extended this transformation to the negation of the self. By not doing so, she risks turning Kierkegaard's solution into its opposite, just as he warned (Journals, §4:4490). [End Page 81] Ronald F. Marshall First Lutheran Church of West Seattle Seattle, Washington Copyright © 2022 Johns Hopkins University Press and Lutheran Quarterly, Inc.
Read full abstract