Objectives The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of pre-service school counselors’ school field practicum and explore ways to improve it by examining the work performance experiences and perceptions of in-service school counselors regarding school field practicum. Methods To achieve this purpose, a Focus Group Interview was conducted for seven school counselors working in Seoul and non-Seoul schools or provincial offices of education. The inductive analysis was performed for the collected qualitative data. Results As a result of the analysis, it was found that the school counselors participating in the study perform tasks such as counseling, crisis case management, operation and administration, consulting and training, and teaching at the school or provincial office of education. And, it was found that they had experienced counseling, operation and administration, and teaching in school field practicum when they were pre-service school counselors. In school field practicum, the participants experienced teaching, operational and administrative work necessary for subject teachers. However, they rarely experienced counseling and crisis case management, which are most important for school counselor’s work. In addition, the school counselors expressed a need for the school field practicum improvement in terms of the content, timing, duration, supervisor, and manual. Conclusions These results imply that the school field practicum of the pre-service school counselors is not related to the work of the school counselors. This study suggested five aspects to improve the school field practicum of pre-service school counselors. The study is significant in that it examined the effectiveness of school field practicum and suggested the directions for improving the practicum based on the in-service school counselor’s work experiences.
Read full abstract