You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Instrumentation & Technology I1 Apr 2018MP26-09 NOVEL TRACKED FOLEY CATHETER FOR MOTION COMPENSATION DURING IMAGE GUIDED PROSTATE PROCEDURES Graham R. Hale, Sheng Xu, Samuel A. Gold, Kareem N. Rayn, Jonathan B. Bloom, Sherif Mehralivand, Neil Glossop, Baris Turkbey, Peter A. Pinto, and Brad Wood Graham R. HaleGraham R. Hale More articles by this author , Sheng XuSheng Xu More articles by this author , Samuel A. GoldSamuel A. Gold More articles by this author , Kareem N. RaynKareem N. Rayn More articles by this author , Jonathan B. BloomJonathan B. Bloom More articles by this author , Sherif MehralivandSherif Mehralivand More articles by this author , Neil GlossopNeil Glossop More articles by this author , Baris TurkbeyBaris Turkbey More articles by this author , Peter A. PintoPeter A. Pinto More articles by this author , and Brad WoodBrad Wood More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.867AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The ″Tracked Foley″ (TF) is a new technology that uses previously cached MRI data to help orient operators to prostate anatomy and surrounding structures during procedures. Sensors within the TF communicate with an MRI/US fusion system to maintain proper registration (alignment/matching) between MRI and surgical anatomy location and orientation in real time. Although speculative, this feature may augment the da Vinci® robot or focal therapy. We sought to evaluate if the TF could maintain accurate registration after organ and patient motion using custom TF/MRI fusion software. METHODS Study was performed on a custom pelvic anthropomorphic phantom model (CIRS)(phantom), using the prototype TF and custom NIH fusion software. The phantom underwent MRI and the prostate was segmented. The TF was placed in the phantom′s urethra and bladder and next underwent MRI/ultrasound fusion of the prostate using a BK 8818 transducer. Three targets were identified on the neurovascular bundles. Four trials were performed varying motion and the presence of the TF: 1: TF no motion, 2: TF with motion, 3: no TF, no motion, and 4: no TF, with motion. Artificial motion was induced by dropping the CT table for trials 2 and 4. After a needle was placed in each target location with fusion software, a CT scan was used to measure (average) distances from the tip of the needle to the intended target. RESULTS After artificial motion was induced, the group with no TF had a significantly higher average error distance than those with TF (6.4 mm vs 32.2 mm, p=0.0027). There was no difference in average error distance between no motion groups, with or without TF (5.6 mm vs 8.6 mm, p=0.28). There was no significant average error distance between TF with and without motion (5.56 vs 6.35, p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS The TF effectively reduced error distance after organ / patient motion in a catheterizeable custom pelvic phantom model. The TF maintains accurate MRI/prostate registration after simulated motion or position change of critical structures during procedures. This technology may lead to the more accurate merging of images for challenging prostate surgery or focal therapy. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e339 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Graham R. Hale More articles by this author Sheng Xu More articles by this author Samuel A. Gold More articles by this author Kareem N. Rayn More articles by this author Jonathan B. Bloom More articles by this author Sherif Mehralivand More articles by this author Neil Glossop More articles by this author Baris Turkbey More articles by this author Peter A. Pinto More articles by this author Brad Wood More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract