The article is devoted to the specifics of civil responsibility of participants of tourist relations for breach of monetary obligations.The institute of civil responsibility of participants of tourist relations for violation of monetary obligations encourages the parties to thecontract to properly fulfill their obligations, and is also a guarantee of effective protection of their rights and legitimate interests. At thelegislative level, a different set of measures of responsibility is provided for, which can be used by a participant of tourist relations inorder to restore their violated rights.The authors substantiated the thesis that if the amount of the penalty is not specified in the contract, and the law regulating therelevant legal relations does not provide for the possibility of its collection, then the right to it does not arise. It was concluded that apenalty is characterized by an incomplete composition of a civil offense, and for the emergence of an obligation to pay it, damages andtheir amount have no legal significance.In order to protect the interests of tourists, it is proposed in the Law of Ukraine «On Tourizm» to replace the right to collect afine instead of a credit penalty.It has been established that entities that carry out and/or provide tourist activities have the right to collect a contractual penalty,and tourists – a legal penalty in the amount specified in Part 5 ofArticle 10 of the Law of Ukraine «On Protection of Consumer Rights».It was concluded that freedom in the defined scope of contractual responsibility cannot be considered absolute, since the limitsof self-regulation are defined at the legislative level by establishing mandatory prohibitions.The thesis about the inadmissibility of thesimultaneous collection of a fine and a penalty for violation of a monetary obligation is substantiated.Based on the analysis of court decisions and doctrinal approaches, it was concluded that inflationary losses and 3% per annumare part of the monetary obligation and are a special measure of responsibility. The inadmissibility of applying indexation to monetaryliabilities expressed in equivalent to foreign currency has been established.It is emphasized that the payment of a contractual or legal penalty should eliminate the possibility of additional recourse to themethods of protection established by Art. 625 of the Civil Code of Ukraine.
Read full abstract