Introduction Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the highest cause of death in the post- neonatal period. According to the Triple Risk Model (Kinney et al., 2009), SIDS results when three factors simultaneously influence the infant: (a) an underlying vulnerability in the infant, (b) a critical developmental period, and (c) an exogenous stressor. Considering exogenous stressor evidences, the objectives were: to determine the thermal behavior of current baby mattresses, to test improvements reached by new materials, to confirm the viability to design harmfulness mattresses according to Oeko-tex, to confirm that rebreathing of exhaled air is above the safety threshold concluding with a design criteria including the properties mentioned above. Materials and methods Thermal test It was used a thermal mannequin ST-2 made by Measurement Technology Northwest. Test specimens were: (1) spring mat.-foam-textile cover sewed. (2) Fiber mat.-foam 3d textile. (3) PU mat. core low density PU-PVC cover. (4) PU Mat. core with low density PU. (5) Babykeeper®mat. core. (6) Babykeeper®mat. core-3D foam textile. (7) Babykeeper®mat. core-Smart textile. Toxicity and Rebreathing test Oekotex test was performed by AITEX following label standards. To study rebreathing avoidance an infant mannequin was simulated as a head box which was placed with its open face on the mattress and connected with tubing to a gas reservoir filled with 5% CO2. Also it was used 50 cc syringe with two one-way valves which simulates infant breathing. Finally a CO2 analyzer was placed in the head box (tested by Bar-Yishay Phd). Both tests were executed to confirm liability of new materials: spec. 2 and 7. Results Thermal Test Results (Test Specimen (Temperature average last 30 min, Thermal Resistance Rt (C m2/W)): 1: (38.4oC, 3.2) 2: (40.1oC, 3.34) 3: (38.4oC, 3.2) 4: (38.1oC, 3.17) 5: (37.2oC, 3.1) 6: (38.5oC, 3.20) 7: (38.3oC, 3.19) Oekotex: Not toxic class1; and Rebreathing results (specimen (Max CO2(%),Time to reach plateau (sec)): Fiber core with 3D Foam (4.36 ± 0.11, 324 ± 1.4) Babykeeper®mat. (3.35 ± 0.14, 298 ± 19) In this sense both systems had a significantly faster rate of CO2 elimination (4–5 min) compared to 15–18.7 min. for other mattresses (P Conclusion As a conclusion design recommendation are: RT Acknowledgements Authors give thanks to IBV and AITEX for collaboration during laboratory test.
Read full abstract