Studies In Educational Evaluation Research Articles

What Is Worth Knowing and What Can Be Taught

Previous articleNext article No AccessWhat Is Worth Knowing and What Can Be TaughtDavid R. OlsonDavid R. Olson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 82, Number 1Nov., 1973 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/443113 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). Copyright 1973 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:William F. McComas Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science, Science & Education 17, no.2-32-3 (Feb 2007): 249–263.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9081-yH.L. Johnson, B.L. Trout, C.J. Brekke, L.O. Luedecke Hands-on, Demonstration, and Videotape Laboratories for Non-Science Majors in a Food Science Course: Achievement, Attitude, and Efficiency, Journal of Food Science Education 3, no.11 (May 2006): 2–7.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2004.tb00033.xPinchas Tamir Science Assessment, (Jan 1996): 93–129.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3_4Isabel Alarcão, António Moreira Technical Rationality and Learning by Reflecting on Action in Teacher Education: dichotomy or complement?, Journal of Education for Teaching 19, no.11 (Jan 2011): 31–40.https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747930190104Isabel Alarcão, António Moreira Technical Rationality and Learning by Reflecting on Action in Teacher Education: dichotomy or complement?, Journal of Education for Teaching 19, no.44 (Aug 2006): 183–191.https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747930190416William Ives Evaluating new multimedia technologies for self-paced instruction, Evaluation and Program Planning 15, no.33 (Jul 1992): 287–296.https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(92)90093-APinchas Tamir, Rodney L. Doran, Yeoh Oon Chye Practical skills testing in science, Studies in Educational Evaluation 18, no.33 (Jan 1992): 263–275.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(92)90001-TKenneth Tobin Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning, School Science and Mathematics 90, no.55 (Mar 2010): 403–418.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb17229.xPinchas Tamir Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education 4, no.22 (Jan 1988): 99–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90011-XByung-Soon Choi, Eugene Gennaro The effectiveness of using computer simulated experiments on junior high students' understanding of the volume displacement concept, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24, no.66 (Sep 1987): 539–552.https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240604T. G.K. Bryce, I. J. Robertson What can they do? A review of practical assessment in Science, Studies in Science Education 12, no.11 (Mar 2008): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268508559921Avi Hofstein, Vincent N. Lunetta The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching: Neglected Aspects of Research, Review of Educational Research 52, no.22 (Jun 2016): 201–217.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052002201Vincent N. Lunetta, Avi Hofstein Simulations in science education, Science Education 65, no.33 (Jul 1981): 243–252.https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650302Robert M. Gagné, Richard T. White Memory Structures and Learning Outcomes, Review of Educational Research 48, no.22 (Jun 2016): 187–222.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543048002187David R. Olson Mass media versus schoolmen: The role of themeans of instruction in the attainment of educational goals, Interchange 5, no.22 (Jun 1974): 11–17.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02138825

Emerging Models for Educational Evaluation

Previous articleNext article No AccessEmerging Models for Educational EvaluationElliot W. EisnerElliot W. Eisner Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 80, Number 4Aug., 1972 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/443050 Views: 31Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). Copyright 1972 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Rod Ellis Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum, TASK. Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning 1, no.11 (May 2021): 11–46.https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00002.ellG. Isaacs Athena, Andrew and Stanford: a look at implementation and evaluation in three large projects, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 5, no.22 (Jun 1989): 84–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1989.tb00201.xMariela Tovar Research: Representing multiple perspectives: Collaborative‐democratic evaluation in distance education, American Journal of Distance Education 3, no.22 (Jan 1989): 44–56.https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526663Charles M. Vance The Curriculum Imperative of Teaching Future Managers to Teach, Journal of Management Development 7, no.11 (Jan 1988): 24–32.https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051663Adrian Treffers Two-Dimensional Goal Description, (Jan 1987): 119–158.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3707-9_4Charles M. Vance Integration of Organizational Behavior Within Higher Education: Four Levels of Needed Involvement for Upperclass and Graduate Curricula, Human Relations 37, no.33 (Mar 1984): 191–205.https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678403700302Barry J. Fraser Directions in curriculum evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation 10, no.22 (Jan 1984): 125–134.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(84)80012-7RICHARD M. JAEGER, MARIAN B. WOLF THE EFFECT OF STIMULUS FORMAT ON DISCRIMINABILITY IN SCHOOL SURVEYS, Journal of Educational Measurement 19, no.33 (Sep 1982): 163–178.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1982.tb00125.xMichel A. Zwarts On the construction and validation of domain-referenced measurements, Evaluation in Education 5, no.22 (Jan 1982): 119–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-765X(82)90013-1Phillip C. Dunn Evaluation and the Arts, Design For Arts in Education 82, no.55 (Aug 2010): 27–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/07320973.1981.9940084Robert M. Diamond, Richard R. Sudweeks A comprehensive approach to course evaluation, Journal of Instructional Development 4, no.11 (Sep 1980): 28–34.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908820Darrell L. Fisher, Barry J. Fraser Evaluating the Impact of a National Curriculum on Content‐Free Cognitive Outcomes, European Journal of Science Education 2, no.11 (Feb 2007): 45–59.https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528800020106Rolland G. Paulston Evaluation reflections, Studies in Educational Evaluation 6, no.33 (Jan 1980): 301–327.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(80)90034-6M. Ann Dirkes Learning Through Creative Thinking, Gifted Child Quarterly 21, no.44 (Jul 2016): 526–537.https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627702100411Elizabeth Vallance The Landscape of “The Great Plains Experience”, Curriculum Inquiry 7, no.22 (Dec 2014): 87–105.https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11076210David Hamilton 8: Making Sense of Curriculum Evaluation: Continuities and Discontinuities in an Educational Idea, Review of Research in Education 5, no.11 (Jun 2016): 318–347.https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X005001318George E. Hein The science of watching and wondering, The Urban Review 9, no.44 (Dec 1976): 242–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02175470Carl E. Thoresen, Craig K. Ewart Behavioral Self-Control and Career Development, The Counseling Psychologist 6, no.33 (Sep 2016): 29–43.https://doi.org/10.1177/001100007600600307Elliot W. Eisner Toward a more adequate conception of evaluation in the arts, de arte 10, no.1818 (Aug 2016): 3–8.https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.1975.11760879Robert J. Menges Assessing Readiness for Professional Practice, Review of Educational Research 45, no.22 (Jul 2016): 173–207.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045002173 Select Bibliography of Current Periodical Articles, Comparative Education Review 17, no.11 (Oct 2015): 121–133.https://doi.org/10.1086/445690

The impact of television: an evaluation of the use of videotapes in psychiatric training.

Two groups of psychiatric residents participated in an educational evaluation study. Thirty-four residents were given a televised course in neurology and psychotherapy; a "live" teacher instructed 19 other residents in neurology and psychiatry. Both groups were tested to determine the relative effectiveness of the two instructional programs. The television group performed better on information accumulation scales and on the acquisition of interviewing skills test; the control group better assimilated the attitudinal positions of the instructor.

Quasi-Experimentation in Educational Settings: Comment

Previous articleNext article No AccessQuasi-Experimentation in Educational Settings: CommentDavid E. Wiley, and R. Darrell BockDavid E. Wiley Search for more articles by this author , and R. Darrell Bock Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 75, Number 4Winter, 1967 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/442819 Views: 5Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). Copyright 1967 University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Lynn McIntyre, Edwin G. Beizer, Lise Manchester, Wade Blanchard, Suzanne Officer, A. Catherine Simpson The Dartmouth Health Promotion Study: A Failed Quest for Synergy in School Health Promotion, Journal of School Health 66, no.44 (Apr 1996): 132–137.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1996.tb08233.xLynn McIntyre, Edwin G. Belzer, Lise Manchester, Wade Blanchard, Suzanne Officer, A. Catherine Simpson The Dartmouth Health Promotion Study: A Failed Quest for Synergy in School Health Promotion, Journal of School Health 66, no.33 (Mar 1996): 132–137.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1996.tb06262.xRobert J. Mislevy What Can We Learn from International Assessments?, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17, no.44 (Nov 2016): 419–437.https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737017004419Robert J. Mislevy WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS?, ETS Research Report Series 1995, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–32.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1995.tb01647.xBengt O. Muthen Multilevel Factor Analysis of Class and Student Achievement Components, Journal of Educational Measurement 28, no.44 (Dec 1991): 338–354.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00363.xDavid L. McArthur A Comparison of Models for Measuring Achievement, (Jan 1987): 249–265.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3257-9_9RALPH A. HANSON, ROBERT F. MCMORRIS, JERRY D. BAILEY DIFFERENCES IN INSTRUCTIONAL SENSITIVITY BETWEEN ITEM FORMATS AND BETWEEN ACHIEVEMENT TEST ITEMS, Journal of Educational Measurement 23, no.11 (Mar 1986): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1986.tb00230.xRalph A. Hanson Program evaluation and improvement based on cost-effectiveness analyses, Studies in Educational Evaluation 12, no.11 (Jan 1986): 89–108.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(86)90039-8Daniel L. Stufflebeam, William J. Webster An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation, (Jan 1983): 23–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7_2Robert S. Barcikowski Statistical Power with Group Mean as the Unit of Analysis, Journal of Educational Statistics 6, no.33 (Nov 2016): 267–285.https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006003267Daniel L. Stufflebeam, William J. Webster An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2, no.33 (Jun 2016): 5–20.https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737002003005Daniel L. Stufflebeam, William J. Webster An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation, (Jan 1980): 23–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6675-8_2Leigh Burstein Chapter 4: The Analysis of Multilevel Data in Educational Research and Evaluation, Review of Research in Education 8, no.11 (Jun 2016): 158–233.https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X008001158Thomas Kellaghan, George F. Madaus, Ernest A. Rakow Within-school variance in achievement: School effects or error?, Studies in Educational Evaluation 5, no.22 (Jan 1979): 101–107.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(79)90011-7R. S. Soar Problems in Analyzing Process-Product Relationships in Studies of Teacher Effectiveness, Journal of Education 160, no.33 (Jul 2018): 96–116.https://doi.org/10.1177/002205747816000306ERNEST A. RAKOW, PETER W. AIRASIAN, GEORGE F. MADAUS ASSESSING SCHOOL AND PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS: ESTIMATING TEACHER LEVEL EFFECTS, Journal of Educational Measurement 15, no.11 (Mar 1978): 15–21.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00052.xGary J. Anderson, Herbert J. Walberg, Wayne W. Welch Curriculum Effects on the Social Climate of Learning: A New Representation of Discriminant Functions, American Educational Research Journal 6, no.33 (Jun 2016): 315–328.https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006003315

On the Corruption of Education by Psychology

Previous articleNext article No AccessOn the Corruption of Education by PsychologyJoseph J. SchwabJoseph J. Schwab Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 66, Number 2Summer, 1958 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/442438 Views: 25Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). Copyright 1958 University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:D. Ciuffetelli Parker, C. J. Craig An International Inquiry: Stories of Poverty-Poverty Stories, Urban Education 52, no.11 (Jan 2015): 120–151.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914566097Yali Zou, Cheryl J. Craig, Rita P. Poimbeauf What the West could learn from the East: a reflective analysis, Teachers and Teaching 22, no.77 (Jun 2016): 842–857.https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1185820Joseph Reimer Balancing Educational Practice with Psychological Theory: Lukinsky’s Study of a Bold Camp Ramah Curriculum, Journal of Jewish Education 82, no.22 (May 2016): 159–177.https://doi.org/10.1080/15244113.2016.1168193Carey Philpott How is teacher knowledge shaped by the professional knowledge context? Minding our metaphors, Journal of Curriculum Studies 45, no.44 (Aug 2013): 462–480.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.796527Margaret R. Olson, Cheryl J. Craig “Small” Stories and Meganarratives: Accountability in Balance, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 111, no.22 (Feb 2009): 547–572.https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100201Cheryl J. Craig, Louise F. Deretchin Summary and Implications, Action in Teacher Education 29, no.5-65-6 (Mar 2008): 41–43.https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2008.10519432J. Wesley Null An Introduction to Isaac Leon Kandel: Who He Was and Why He Matters, The Educational Forum 71, no.22 (Jan 2008): 142–156.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720708984927Hanan A. Alexander A Jewish View of Human Learning, International Journal of Children's Spirituality 4, no.22 (Dec 1999): 155–164.https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436990040204Gary Sykes Learning, Teaching, and Administering: A Response to Rowan, Educational Administration Quarterly 31, no.11 (Feb 1995): 143–150.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X95031001009Rod Fawns The cultural roots of school biology in australia — from vitalism and mechanism to dialectic materialism, Research in Science Education 18, no.11 (Dec 1988): 268–275.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356604Naftaly S. Glasman, Robert H. Koff, Heather Spiers Preface, Review of Educational Research 54, no.44 (Jun 2016): 461–471.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054004461Lya Kremer Cognitive and Affective Orientations and Teaching Behaviors ‐ A Study of Differentiation, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 25, no.11 (Jul 2006): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383810250101Robert E. Floden Chapter 2: The Logic of Information-Processing Psychology in Education, Review of Research in Education 9, no.11 (Jun 2016): 75–109.https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X009001075Joel Weiss Chapter 9: Assessing Nonconventional Outcomes of Schooling, Review of Research in Education 8, no.11 (Jun 2016): 405–454.https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X008001405Aharon F. Kleinberger Research and policy-making in education, Studies in Educational Evaluation 2, no.33 (Dec 1976): 215–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-491X(76)90026-2

Social Behavior and the Administrative Process

Perhaps the most vigorous movement in administration in recent years has been directed toward the development of a comprehensive theory capable of generating both hypotheses for guiding research and principles for guiding practice. Despite many specific advances in special areas, such as hospital administration, public administration, business administraton, and educational administration, there still is no general conceptual framework for systematizing and interrelating our knowledge within and among these areas. It is still impossible to speak of administration in terms that would be acceptable to, or for that matter even readily understandable by, students and practitioners in the several special fields. This failure to conceptualize administration on a general theoretical level has been a major obstacle to the development of administration as a rigorous discipline, and the elaboration of theory is accordingly receiving increased attention both in "research" and "applied" administrative settings. The purpose of the present paper is twofold: (a) to describe a socio-psychological theory of social behavior having broad application to the area of administration and (b) to illustrate the application of the theory to major issues in administration. The four major issues considered here are: the problem of institutional and individual conflict; the problem of staff effectiveness, efficiency, and satis-

The Persistency of Error in English Composition

Previous articleNext article FreeThe Persistency of Error in English CompositionRoy Ivan JohnsonRoy Ivan Johnson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 25, Number 8Oct., 1917 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/436796 Views: 102 Citations: 4Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Manuel Lucero, María Jesús Fernández, Manuel Montanero Teachers’ written feedback comments on narrative texts in Elementary and Secondary Education, Studies in Educational Evaluation 59 (Dec 2018): 158–167.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.002Star Medzerian Style and the Pedagogy of Response, Rhetoric Review 29, no.22 (Mar 2010): 186–202.https://doi.org/10.1080/07350191003613468Stephen D. Krashen, Howard White Is Spelling Acquired or Learned? A Re-analysis of Rice (1897) and Cornman (1902), ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 91-92 (Jan 1991): 1–48.https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.91-92.01kraB.J. Frraser Evaluating the Intrinsic Worth of Curricular Goals: A Discussion and an Example, Journal of Curriculum Studies 9, no.22 (Sep 2006): 125–132.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027770090205

The Elimination of Waste in Education

Previous articleNext article FreeThe Elimination of Waste in EducationJohn Franklin BobbittJohn Franklin Bobbitt Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 12, Number 6Feb., 1912 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/454122 Views: 1029Total views on this site Citations: 32Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The Elementary School Teacher (1902-1914), which is continued by The Elementary School Journal (1914-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Daeyoung Goh Understanding the School Curriculum: Theory, Politics and Principles, Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies 19, no.11 (Dec 2021): 129–136.https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.40551Sally J. Zepeda, Sevda Yıldırım, Salih Çevik The Changing Nature of School Supervision, (Mar 2021): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39666-4_66-1Manuel Losada-Sierra LA ADMINISTRACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE LA EDUCACIÓN Y LA CONDICION CONTINGENTE DEL SER HUMANO, Educação & Sociedade 41 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.1590/es.227542Valerie Shute, Seyedahmad Rahimi, Ginny Smith Game-Based Learning Analytics in Physics Playground, (Sep 2019): 69–93.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9335-9_4J. A. Sedgwick University students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a literature review, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 35, no.0303 (Jul 2017): 221–235.https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2017.20Jonghun Kim School accountability and standard-based education reform: The recall of social efficiency movement and scientific management, International Journal of Educational Development 60 (May 2018): 80–87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.003Joseph da Silva From Origin to Modernity: A Brief History of American School Design, (Aug 2018): 17–74.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78586-8_2Antti Saari Knowledge Without Contexts? A Foucauldian Analysis of E.L. Thorndike’s Positivist Educational Research, Studies in Philosophy and Education 35, no.66 (May 2016): 589–603.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9527-2William T. Allen, Scott L. Hunsaker Teacher Conceptions, Curriculum Ideologies, and Adaptations to Linear Change in River School District, Journal for the Education of the Gifted 39, no.33 (Jul 2016): 195–220.https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216657183Walter Herzog Durchgriff auf den Lernprozess, (Oct 2015): 109–139.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10084-1_7Matthew D. Dewar The Reduction of Education to Curriculum as Techne and Its Ontological Consequences, (Aug 2016): 25–49.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60276-3_2Howard Lee, Gregory Lee Reconstructing Education and Knowledge: Scientific Management, Educational Efficiency, Outcomes-Based Education, and the Culture of Performativity, (Nov 2014): 375–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9493-0_22Wayne Au Teaching under the new Taylorism: high‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 st century curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies 43, no.11 (Feb 2011): 25–45.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261Eleni Karatzia–Stavlioti Pupil Assessment in a Historical Perspective: Contribution to the Contemporary Debate, (Jan 2010): 207–226.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8534-4_12Lorrie A. Shepard The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture, Journal of Education 189, no.1-21-2 (Dec 2017): 95–106.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-207 Hoo-Jo Hong, Dae-Seok Kim Inquiry of the Optimal Numbers of Courses Within One Semester and One School Day, The Journal of Curriculum Studies 26, no.44 (Dec 2008): 73–101.https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.26.4.200812.004Wayne Au Between education and the economy: high‐stakes testing and the contradictory location of the new middle class, Journal of Education Policy 23, no.55 (Sep 2008): 501–513.https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802148941Indira Chacko REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS: TEACHERS’ EVALUATION OF PUPILS’ SOLUTIONS, Studies in Educational Evaluation 33, no.3-43-4 (Sep 2007): 338–354.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.008 Ok Seung Yang Understanding Early Childhood Curriculum as a Theoretical Research Field: Analysis of American Curriculum 1828-1927, Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education 27, no.22 (Apr 2007): 281–294.https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2007.27.2.013Valerie J. Shute TENSIONS, TRENDS, TOOLS, AND TECHNOLOGIES: TIME FOR AN EDUCATIONAL SEA CHANGE, ETS Research Report Series 2006, no.11 (Aug 2014): i–49.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02022.xJ. WESLEY NULL, JACQUE ENSIGN ARTICLES, Educational Studies 34, no.44 (Dec 2003): 397–423.https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326993ES3404_2Lorrie A. Shepard The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture, Educational Researcher 29, no.77 (Jul 2016): 4–14.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004John Stevenson The metamorphosis of the construction of competence, Studies in Continuing Education 18, no.11 (Jan 1996): 24–42.https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037960180102Jesse Goodman Change without Difference: School Restructuring in Historical Perspective, Harvard Educational Review 65, no.11 (Apr 1995): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.1.9856723ur2648m35Anthony J. Shinkfield, Daniel L. Stufflebeam Historical Perspectives of Teacher Evaluation, (Jan 1995): 9–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1796-5_1Connie Ruhl-Smith Book Review: Visionary Leadership in Schools, Journal of School Leadership 3, no.55 (Jan 2019): 597–600.https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469300300510John Stevenson Australian vocational education: learning from past mistakes?, The Vocational Aspect of Education 44, no.22 (Jan 1992): 233–244.https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347308003941Henry St. Maurice A guide to commonplaces: on the use of loci in educators’ discourse, Journal of Curriculum Studies 23, no.11 (Jan 1991): 41–53.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230103Daniel J. Walsh Changes in kindergarten: Why here? Why now?, Early Childhood Research Quarterly 4, no.33 (Sep 1989): 377–391.https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(89)90022-7George H. Wood The hope for civic education, Theory Into Practice 27, no.44 (Sep 1988): 296–302.https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848809543368Herbert M. Kliebard The Drive for Curriculum Change in the United States, 1890‐1958.1—The Ideological Roots of Curriculum as a Field of Specialization, Journal of Curriculum Studies 11, no.33 (Jul 1979): 191–202.https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027790110302Avi I Mintz, Leonard J. Waks, Andrea R. English What Is the Purpose of Education?: Dewey's Challenge to His Contemporaries On Chapter 9: Natural Development and Social Efficiency as Aims, (): 81–88.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492765.012