The paper examines modern approaches of court practice in order to determine the legal nature of complex intellectual property objects, as well as creative outputs generated on social networks. The author analyzes the Judicial Review of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 2024 and the practice of the Intellectual Property Rights Court, devoted to topical issues of judicial protection of creative outputs on the Internet, as well as doctrinal sources, foreign experience on the issues under consideration. A legal analysis of complex intellectual property objects, ways of using them on the Internet, as well as gaps in legislative regulation in this area is carried out. The issues of the legal status of the information intermediary, the definition of the violator in social networks, especially on telegram channels, as well as the possibilities and criteria for the application of interim measures in case of violation of copyright and related rights are considered separately. In addition, cases and examples from law enforcement practice are considered when the copyright holder may, at their discretion, allow or prohibit other persons from using the result of intellectual activity or a means of individualization, since the absence of a ban is not considered consent (permission), which is a frequent violation, especially on the Internet.