As trade unions have come to confront new challenges, many have turned to alliances with NGOs and community groups. On a global scale, most prominent alternative to 'traditional' institutions comes in form of World Social Forum. This paper will examine origins of World Social Forum providing a short history of its foundations. It then proceeds to critically analyse forum, its foundations, organizing principles and achievements.The first World Social Forum (WSF) was held in Porto Allegre as a response to World Economic Forum. According to one of founders of WSF, Fransisco Chico Whitaker, development of WSF can be seen in context of emerging protests against World Trade Organization, IMF and World Bank in 1998 and 1999 . Following this, Whitaker suggests that fellow Brazillian, Oded Grajew, suggested idea of a social forum similar to World Economic Forum which had taken place in Davos for roughly 20 years3. This led to consultation with director of newspaper Le Monde Diplomatique and president of Association for Taxation of financial Transactions for Aid of Citizens (ATTAC) in France, Bernard Cassen. Cassen provided encouragement, and promised promotion through his newspaper4. After consultations between Whitaker, Grajew and other interested organizations in Brazil, it was decided that first WSF would be held in Porto Allegre, Brazil in 2001.As a proposal, WSF can be considered Franco-Brazilian in origin (mostly Brazilian) with initial network of organizations consisting of Brazilian Association of Non-Governmental Organizations [Brazil]; ATTAC [France]; Brazilian Justice & Peace Commission [Brazil]; Brazilian Business Association for Citizenship [Brazil]; Central Trade Union Federation [Brazil]; Brazilian Institute for Social and Economic Studies [Brazil]; Centre for Global Justice [Brazil] and Landless Rural Workers Movement [Brazil]5. These organizations sent a delegation to Geneva where a major anti-globalization demonstration was taking place against United Nations' Copenhagen Summit, and set up first Committee, to organize forum.Since 2001, WSF has run in successive years in a variety of locations including Brazil, India, Mali, Venezuela, Pakistan and Kenya. The organizations with delegates on International Council have expanded to include various trade union confederations, non-government organizations, peasant organizations from around world with many more organizations taking part in forum each year.From perspective of trade union internationals, it appears that participation in WSF has been largely instrumental in nature, in particular in relation to promotion of Decent Work agenda. Evidence of this is in formation of Decent Work Alliance, a subgroup within WSF. According to ITUC, the Decent Work Alliance, led by ITUC, ETUC, Solidar, Global Progressive Forum and Social Alert, will also be organizing events during WSF on following themes: a new financial architecture to ensure decent work; a global welfare state; and decent work, decent life campaign6. Such participation has led commentators such as Peter Waterman to conclude that ...the newly-merged International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is coming in forcefully, under banner of 'Decent Work'7. Other national trade union confederations have forged links with forum in terms of seeing common aims and goals. An example of this is Australian Council of Trade Union's 2003 congress which in relation to its campaign against financial deregulation resolved to participate in new organizing frameworks including WSF8.While WSF may be an impressive event from an organizational and logistical perspective, ability of WSF to represent labour on a global scale is a separate question. Its effectiveness in terms of how its participating organizations are achieving its stated aims of opposing neoliberalism and. …
Read full abstract