The article deals with the project of understanding transcendental reality, undertaken within the framework of phenomenology. It is shown that phenomenological reduction, which leaves beyond the limits of evidence all types of objects of consciousness and all types of existence, if they do not reveal their meaning within the framework of the phenomenal givenness of themselves to experience, fundamentally does not allow us to talk about the transcendent. This circumstance reveals the limitations of phenomenology and the need to supplement it with various ontological and epistemological constructions, such as positive sciences, theology, theory of objects, ontology of ideal objects, etc. The article demonstrates a project for such an addition: the fundamental ontology of Martin Heidegger. Martin Heidegger shows that phenomenology in the format of fundamental ontology Dasein has an advantage over theology, since it is the science of being, and theology is just the science of existence, namely one of its types — historical revelation. It turns out that this project separates phenomenology and theology as the basis for any positive research, including theological, and thus does not allow us to talk about a phenomenological study of the transcendent. Thus, it is shown that phenomenological philosophy and theology are fundamentally incompatible.
Read full abstract