Dirty Words & Filthy Pictures: Film and the First Amendment. Jeremy Geltzer. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2015. 384 pp. $29.95 pbk.In March 2016, Michael Eakin joined Seamus McCaffery as the second Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice to quit the Keystone State's high court within an 18-month span, following scandal over alleged pornographic, racist, and sexually offensive emails. Readers of Jeremy Geltzer's new book, Dirty Words and Filthy Pictures, may find this fitting karmic payback.That is because, as Geltzer reveals in what he calls film-legal history, Pennsylvania in 1911 was the first state to adopt statewide motion picture censorship law (Chicago, he tells us, was the first city to embrace such measure in 1907). The Pennsylvania statute tasked censorship board with reviewing and disapproving of movies featuring sacrilegious, obscene, indecent, or immoral content. Furthermore, as Geltzer describes it, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court from which Eakin and McCaffery recently resigned was once famously the workplace of Judge Michael Angelo Musmanno. In the 1950s, Musmanno was a zealous supporter of film censorship, known for writing fierce and fiery indictments against uncensored cinema. Make that, then, double dose of karma for Eakin and McCaffery, with Musmanno surely rolling over in his grave in Arlington National Cemetery at the alleged actions of his brethren.These are just several examples of the many filmic factoids Geltzer sprinkles into his chronological, comprehensive survey of the history and legal battles surrounding movie censorship (including self-censorship, not just the government variety) and controversies in the United States. Geltzer is well qualified to address the push and pull between the forces of government regulation and freedom of expression that frequently finds cinematic works caught in the middle. A California-based intellectual property attorney who worked as in-house counsel for several major Hollywood studios, Geltzer also teaches, including course taught in Spring 2016 for UCLA Extension called Cinema, Law & Censorship.The vast territory covered in this mile-wide, foot-deep (definitely more than an inch in some places, but not all) tome stretches from stirs in the 1890s caused by movies such as The Kiss and The Dolorita Passion Dance through the 2013 sentencing in Los Angeles of Ira Isaacs to 48 months in prison for distributing obscene videos featuring bestiality and scatology. In between, Geltzer covers, in often alliterative fashion, everything from the Supreme Court's initial rejection and later recognition of films as form of expression safeguarded by the First Amendment to the high court's shifting definitions of obscenity. The author touches on all genres of films that have faced the wrath of both moral custodians and prosecutors over the years. Prizefighting pictures were an early target (Maine banned them in 1897), for instance, as were sacrilegious films, war movies, and those with drug-based themes, such as provocateur Otto Preminger's The Man With the Golden Arm, starring Frank Sinatra. …
Read full abstract