Impact Of COVID-19 Research Articles

Impact of COVID-19 on Depression, Anxiety and Stress of Dental Students: A Systematic Review.

To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety and stress of dental students by way of a systematic review. This review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. An electronic search was conducted for the period January 2020 to February 2023. Quality assessment was evaluated in accordance with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Frequency distribution was calculated for stress, anxiety and depression associated with students' gender, year of study and living circumstances. Twenty-three studies were eligible for inclusion in the final review. Variables contributing to stress, anxiety and depression of dental students include gender, year of study and living circumstances. Being female is the most significant factor impacting on mental health. Results emphasise the need for dental institutions to develop targeted intervention programmes for more vulnerable students. Failure to act in a future pandemic event could result in ongoing psychological issues that persist following graduation, resulting in unfit dentists who may potentially affect the quality of the dental workforce.

Decolonial filmmaking: Interview with Simone Brioni

In this interview, filmmaker and scholar Simone Brioni talks about the two most recent documentaries which he wrote, Maka () and Oltre i bordi (Beyond the Frame) (), which share reflections about the visual representation of Africans in media and Italy’s colonial legacy. He discusses the similarities and differences between these films and the documentaries he made in 2012 with/about writers Kaha Mohamed Aden and Ribka Sibhatu, respectively, called La quarta via (The Fourth Road) () and Aulò (). In particular, Brioni focuses on the collaborative process with director Elia Moutamid and protagonist Geneviève Makaping to make the documentary Maka. Brioni also talks about how the dialogue from which the documentaries have emerged has progressively become the theme of the film themselves. Other topics of the interview include the use of the documentary to produce academic research, the impact of COVID-19 on the making of the films and the circulation and distribution of the films.

The impact of COVID-19 on time toxicity in patients with advanced cancer.

267 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid adoption of telemedicine but little is known about whether the changes in care delivery has led to differences in time toxicity for patients with advanced cancer. This study examines the impact of the pandemic on time toxicity, defined as the time burden of interacting with the healthcare system, by comparing healthcare contact days between pre-COVID and post-COVID periods. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with advanced (stage 4) cancer who died within one year of diagnosis at Kaiser Permanente Northern California between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2023. Time toxicity was defined as the percentage of healthcare contact days over the course of survival period between cancer diagnosis and death (contact days/survival days). We included outpatient days (imaging, labs, treatment, provider visits), inpatient stays (emergency department, acute inpatient, non-acute institutional stays), and in-home days (in-home care, virtual care, home hospice). Differences between pre-COVID (diagnosed and died before March 1, 2020) and post-COVID (diagnosed after March 1, 2020) periods were analyzed using Wilcoxon tests. Results: The cohort included 9643 patients, with 6558 pre-COVID and 3085 post-COVID. Median age at diagnosis was 74 years, and the cohort was 46.9% female, largely white (64.5%), with a high comorbidity score (median Elixhauser score: 4). Post-COVID, there was an increase in institutional stay (8.7% vs. 9.3%) and outpatient service (imaging and labs) (4.4% vs. 3.1%), while in-person outpatient visits decreased (5.9% vs. 8.7%, p<0.0001). Additionally, in-home days increased (25.0% vs. 20.8%), with a significant rise in in-home virtual care (3.9% vs. 1.8%, all p<0.01). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to notable shifts in healthcare utilization for patients with advanced cancer in the last year of life. The increase in telehealth and in-home services in the post-COVID era was accompanied by a slight increase in emergency and ancillary services. Further understanding patient experiences around these shifts is crucial for optimizing care and managing time toxicity in the evolving healthcare landscape. Description of outcomes pre and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Total Pre-COVID Post-COVID P-value Survival Days, median 86.0 84.0 89.0 0.02 Percentage of Contact, median (interquartile range) Comprehensive Contact 63.3 (41.0-92.0) 62.5 (40.7-91.0) 65.2 (41.7-94.1) 0.01 Institutional stay 9.0 (2.7-26.2) 8.7 (2.7-25.9) 9.3 (2.9-26.8) 0.11 Outpatient 12.4 (5.3-19.8) 12.9 (5.6-20.6) 11.2 (4.8-18.1) <.001 Outpatient visit 7.7 (2.8-13.4) 8.7 (3.5-14.6) 5.9 (1.6-10.7) <.0001 Outpatient service 3.5 (0.8-6.3) 3.1 (0.4-5.8) 4.4 (1.5-7.1) <.0001 In-home 22.2 (7.4-50.0) 20.8 (6.0-48.4) 25.0 (10.4-51.7) <.001 In-home care 18.1 (1.7-46.6) 17.4 (1.2-46.2) 19.2 (2.4-47.2) 0.03 In-home virtual care 2.2 (0.0-4.8) 1.8 (0.0-3.8) 3.9 (0.7-7.0) <.0001

Impact of COVID-19 on Basque Musicians: Identifying Main Associations

Abstract In a context marked by restrictions due to COVID-19 pandemic, this article analyses the impact of COVID-19 on Basque musicians’ activity, income, future expectations and life satisfaction. A survey was conducted in 2021 among Basque musicians belonging to MUSIKARI association. Associations among selected variables were analysed calculating correlation rates and conducting inference tests using SPSS software (IBM SPSS statistics). We found that despite the severe damage done by COVID-19 on musicians’ activity and income, this damage has been homogeneous among different types of musicians. We also find that future expectations are strongly conditioned by musicians’ characteristics.

Understanding the role of the COVID-19 pandemic on risky driving behavior and injury severity of drivers: Embracing heterogeneity in means and variances

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered global mobility patterns, leading to a marked decrease in travel activities worldwide. In the United States, travel demand fell notably, contributing to a 22% reduction in overall crashes in 2020 compared to the prior year. In Oregon, vehicle miles traveled dropped by 10.8%, and crashes decreased by 23.9%, yet fatalities increased by 2.63%. This rise in fatal crashes is linked to altered driving behaviors, including aggressive, distracted, and impaired driving.This study investigates factors related to risky driving behavior-induced crashes in Oregon during the pandemic. Utilizing a random parameters multinomial logit model that accommodates heterogeneity, we found significant correlations between reckless behaviors—such as driving without a license, speeding, and neglecting to use restraints—and the severity of injuries. Our findings indicate temporal instability in factors contributing to injury severity. In 2019, severe injuries were more common in crashes involving drug use, drivers aged 45–54, and in speed zones of 45–55 mph. In 2020, young drivers under 25 and night-time crashes on lit streets were more likely to result in severe injuries. This research sheds light on the impact of COVID-19 on driver behavior and injury severity, particularly concerning aggressive driving. The identified risk factors are crucial for state and federal agencies to enhance road safety measures and ensure safer environments for all road users.

EP.13D.13 Exploring COVID-19's Impact on Treatment and Survival in Small Cell Lung Cancer

EP.13D.13 Exploring COVID-19's Impact on Treatment and Survival in Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Global Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Greenspaces on COVID-19 Infection and Mortality Rates.

The COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 resulted in rapidly rising infection rates with high associated mortality rates. In response, several epidemiological studies aimed to define ways in which the spread and severity of COVID-19 can be curbed. As a result, there is a steady increase in the evidence linking greenspaces and COVID-19 impact. However, the evidence of the benefits of greenspaces or greenness to human wellbeing in the context of COVID-19 is fragmented and sometimes contradictory. This calls for a meta-analysis of existing studies to clarify the matter. Here, we identified 621 studies across the world on the matter, which were then filtered down to 13 relevant studies for meta-analysis, covering Africa, Asia, Europe, and the USA. These studies were meta-analyzed, with the impacts of greenness on COVID-19 infection rate quantified using regression estimates whereas impacts on mortality rates were measured using mortality rate ratios. We found evidence of significant negative correlations between greenness and both COVID-19 infection and mortality rates. We further found that the impacts on COVID-19 infection and related mortality are moderated by year of publication, greenness metrics, sample size, health and political covariates. This clarification has far-reaching implications for policy development toward the establishment and management of green infrastructure for the benefit of human wellbeing.

Exploring intercity travel decision-making in a developing country: Insights from COVID-19 impacts in Iran

This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on intercity travel mode choices in Mazandaran province, Iran, addressing critical gaps in understanding how pandemics affect travel behavior in developing countries. The research focuses on how socio-economic factors, perceived health risks, and travel time influence individuals’ choice of transportation modes during the pandemic. Using a stated preference survey method with 669 participants, the study assessed how concerns about virus transmission and adherence to health protocols shape travel decisions. Discrete choice modeling was employed to predict travel mode shares between public transport and personal vehicles. The findings reveal that COVID-19 risk perception, socio-economic factors, and travel time significantly impact travel behavior. Specifically, heightened perceived risk of infection resulted in a 25% reduction in public transportation use, with individuals increasingly opting for personal vehicles. Additionally, strict adherence to health protocols, such as mask-wearing and vehicle cleaning, improved safety perception, leading to a 40% increase in confidence in public transport. The study also found that socio-economic factors like age, income, and education significantly shaped travel preferences. These insights provide valuable guidance for public health policymakers and transportation authorities to enhance the safety and management of intercity travel during ongoing and future pandemics.

Four Years in, What Are the Research Priorities for Long COVID? A Research Priority-Setting Partnership Between People With Lived Experience, Carers, Clinicians and Researchers.

Long COVID is a life-limiting condition that affects 65 million people worldwide. It devastates lives with uncertain illness trajectories, and yet, there are many research uncertainties as there is a lack of understanding of its causes, effective treatments and management plans. We set out to identify current research priorities for people with Long COVID, carers, healthcare professionals and researchers. A systematic literature review and previous Long COVID priority-setting exercises identified three broad under-researched areas of Long COVID research within the fields of Public Health and Health Services Research: symptoms; managing day-to-day life; and the emotional impact of Long COVID. We disseminated an elicitation survey that asked for research questions in these areas; responses were analysed and summarised into 42 research questions. A survey was then disseminated, asking respondents to prioritise these 42 questions. Workshops were held with people with Long COVID, carers, healthcare professionals and researchers to analyse responses and agree the top 10 priorities. The top priorities in order were pharmacological treatment of Long COVID; understanding the pathophysiology; nonpharmacological symptom management; improving public and professional understanding of Long COVID; understanding of the long-term risks of Long COVID; improving financial and social supports; improving understanding of postviral syndromes; diagnostics; service redesign/pathways; and the well-being of children with Long COVID. Four years into the pandemic, there is an emphasis on the need for research on treatment, understanding and support for people living with Long COVID. People with Long COVID and carers were involved in the study design, survey design, dissemination, data analysis, interpretation and reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Long Covid: a global health issue – a prospective, cohort study set in four continents

IntroductionA proportion of people develop Long Covid after acute COVID-19, but with most studies concentrated in high-income countries (HICs), the global burden is largely unknown. Our study aims to characterise...

Oculomotor Behaviour in Individuals with Long COVID-19

Objective To determine, the impact of long COVID-19 on oculomotor behaviour. Design A case–control study. Setting Spanish Association of Persistent COVID. Participant Participants were 75 cases (64 women, 11 men, mean age 46.4 years ±8.9) and 42 controls (22 women, 20 men, mean age 53.5 years ±13.13). Intervention An eye-tracking test based on visual search paradigm and the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were used to evaluate the participants. Main measures The primary outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement Test were horizontal reading time, vertical reading time, and their ratio. And for the eye-tracking test the time to find the target, the duration, and the number of eye fixations. Results In cases and controls, eye movement test results were horizontal(Hadj) reading time 74.2 ± 22.7 s vs 52.0 ± 6.1 s (p < .0001); vertical(Vadj) reading time 67.6 ± 17.8 s vs 50.4 ± 6.9 s (p < .0001); Hadj/Vadj ratio 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.0 ± 0 (p = .0032), respectively; and eye-tracking test results were fixation number 11.3 ± 3.07 vs 3.51 ± 2.57 (p < .0001); fixation duration 2.01 ± 0.79 s vs 1.5 ± 0.4 s (p = .0013), and time to find target 24.5 ± 8.0 vs 18 ± 9.4 (p = .0034), respectively. Conclusions Data showed a lower performance in oculomotor behaviour in people with long COVID-19, compared to healthy individuals. It cannot be affirmed an ocular musculature dysfunction; the differentiated behaviour could be associated to cognitive alterations affected in these people. Both tests used could be an useful tool for the clinical assessment of these participants. Further studies are needed to explore the utility of these procedures.

Psychological impact of physical distancing due to covid 19 pandemic on school and higher education students

MoHFW India, WHO, NHS, and CDC suggested imposing lockdown and closing educational institutions with the spread of covid 19 pandemic to reduce the risk of transmitting the disease. Students faced negative mental health symptoms due to unexpected transition from physical to virtual learning, increased screen time, physical distancing, altered habits, rumors through news, print media, social media, and other means. This study focuses on the psychological impact of covid 19 on school and higher education students due to psychosocial factors like physical distancing. 2140 students, mixed gender, in age from 17 years to 25 years (M = 22.73, SD = 6.12) are selected as sample population for the study. Mixed-method approach is used for data collection that include face to face interactions in clinics, Health Questionnaires &amp; Self-Reports, online counseling to assess the stress &amp; depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, rating scales for Behavior analysis, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale to assess perceived stress, depression, anxiety, and mental health &amp; well-being, respectively. Analysis of data shows that 42.7% of school and higher education students have either depression or anxiety. 71.7% of students reported poor health and well-being. 36.7% of students reported fear of getting infected by virus, many students were reported with cognitive dissonance in myths and truths about Covid-19. 37.9% of students spend their time on media &amp; social media, including watching TV or reading Covid-19 related news and information on various platforms. About 56.2% students reported with increased use of social media. There was a minor difference between depression and anxiety, as reported by females and male students, however expression of separation fear was slightly higher in male students than female students. Physical distancing and lack of social interaction caused stress, anxiety (GAD) and depression symptoms in students due to imbalances in hormones &amp; neurotransmitters.

356 - Impact of COVID 19 on stress levels and coping mechanisms among Ghanaian radiation therapists

356 - Impact of COVID 19 on stress levels and coping mechanisms among Ghanaian radiation therapists

Long-term gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary outcomes of COVID-19: A multinational population-based cohort study from South Korea, Japan, and the UK.

Considering emerging evidence on long COVID, comprehensive analyses of the post-acute complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary systems are needed. We aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the long-term risk of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary diseases and other digestive abnormalities. We used three large-scale population-based cohorts: the Korean cohort (discovery cohort), the Japanese cohort (validation cohort-A), and the UK Biobank (validation cohort-B). A total of 10,027,506 Korean, 12,218,680 Japanese, and 468,617 UK patients aged ≥20 years who had SARS-CoV-2 infection between 2020 and 2021 were matched to non-infected controls. Seventeen gastrointestinal and eight hepatobiliary outcomes as well as nine other digestive abnormalities following SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified and compared with controls. The discovery cohort revealed heightened risks of gastrointestinal diseases (HR 1.15; 95% CI 1.08-1.22), hepatobiliary diseases (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.09-1.55), and other digestive abnormalities (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.10) beyond the first 30 days of infection, after exposure-driven propensity score-matching. The risk was pronounced according to the COVID-19 severity. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was found to lower the risk of gastrointestinal diseases but did not affect hepatobiliary diseases and other digestive disorders. The results derived from validation cohorts were consistent. The risk profile was most pronounced during the initial 3 months; however, it persisted for >6 months in validation cohorts, but not in the discovery cohort. The incidence of gastrointestinal disease, hepatobiliary disease, and other digestive abnormalities increased in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the post-acute phase.

Understanding excess mortality in 2022: The dual impact of COVID-19 and heatwaves on the Italian elderly population

In this study, we employ a comprehensive approach to model the concurrent effects of the COVID-19 epidemic and heatwaves on all-cause excess mortality. Our investigation uncovers distinct peaks in excess mortality, notably among individuals aged 80 years and older, revealing a strong positive correlation with excess temperatures (ET) during the summer of 2022 in Italy. Furthermore, we identify a notable role played by COVID-19 hospitalizations, exhibiting regional disparities, particularly during the winter months. Leveraging functional data regression, we offer robust and coherent insights into the excess mortality trends observed in Italy throughout 2022.

Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on women’s access to and experiences of contraceptive services in England: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic response prompted rapid changes to how contraceptive services were delivered in England. Our aim was to examine women’s experiences of accessing contraceptive services since March 2020 and...

COVID-19’S IMPACT ON FOOD STALL WORKERS: NIGHT MARKETS’ RESILIENCE IN PENANG, MALAYSIA

The COVID-19 pandemic has left an enduring mark on Southeast Asia, with lasting repercussions on financial markets, employment, and gender equality in the workplace. Various activities were halted in order to curb the virus’s spread, which dealt a severe blow to Malaysia’s thriving economy. The informal sector, a cornerstone of the Asia-Pacific service industry, felt these effects acutely, as it heavily relies on informal workers. Given that more than three quarters of Malaysia’s service sector comprises informal workers, the country’s economic recovery is now significantly reliant on this workforce. Considering the contribution of the informal sector to Malaysia’s food market, this study aims to explore the impact of social shocks and economic crises on the resilience of informal workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a multistage probability sampling method, the study employed a questionnaire survey involving Penang’s food stalls in night markets. Findings reveal significant variations in workers’ lifestyles, attitudes, and family dynamics. Gender-related factors also exert a substantial influence on their behavior, attitudes, and engagement levels. While many studies have examined night markets as tourism spots in terms of how to increase sales or attract visitors, this study is among the first to focus on the vendors themselves, exploring the impact of COVID-19 on food stalls as an unseen vulnerable community.

S1479 Comparative Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With vs Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States

S1479 Comparative Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With vs Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States

Inborn errors of immunity are associated with increased COVID-19-related hospitalization and intensive care compared to the general population

BackgroundIt is thought that patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are more susceptible to severe Covid-19 than the general population, but a quantification of this potential risk is largely missing. ObjectiveTo assess the impact of Covid-19 on patients with IEI. MethodsA nationwide cohort study was performed to estimate the relative risk (RR) for hospitalization, intensive care, and death within 30 days after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test in an IEI population (n=2392) compared to the general population (n=8,270,705) using data from Swedish national registries. Three time-periods were studied: Pre-vaccination, Alpha/Delta, and Omicron. Adjustment was made for demographics, income, comorbidities, and vaccination status. ResultsDuring the Pre-vaccination period 25.2% of the IEI population were hospitalized, compared to 17.5% and 5.2% during the Alpha/Delta and Omicron periods, respectively. For the three time periods the adjusted RR for hospitalization in the IEI population compared to the general population was 3.1 [95% CI 2.1–4.2], 3.5 [2.4–4.8], and 4.3 [2.5–6.7], respectively. The adjusted RR for intensive care after Covid-19 were 5.6 [2.6–10.8], 4.7 [1.7–10.1], and 4.7 [1.7–10.1] for the three periods. Five patients (0.6%) in the IEI population died within 30 days of a positive PCR test compared to 18,773 (0.2%) in the general population during the three study periods. ConclusionPatients with IEI had 3-4 times higher risk for hospitalization and 5 times higher risk for intensive care during Covid-19, compared to the general population.

A Framework for Assessing the Impacts of COVID-19 on the Construction Industries in Developing Countries

A Framework for Assessing the Impacts of COVID-19 on the Construction Industries in Developing Countries