Homogeneity Index Values Research Articles

Dosimetric effect of photon beam energy on volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan quality due to body habitus in advanced prostate cancer

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to dosimetrically compare 6- and 10-MV photon beam energies in high-risk prostate cancer patients of various body habitus using a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) radiation delivery technique. The objectives of the study were to evaluate whether dosimetric differences exist and to investigate whether differences are dependent on patient body habitus. Methods and materialsForty patients with various body habitus who had previously received treatment to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes with VMAT techniques were chosen. Patients were planned in the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system with double or triple SmartArc plans with 6- and 10-MV photon energies. All patients were optimized with the same planning objectives and normalized such that 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received the prescription dose. Patients were evaluated for PTV and organ at risk (OAR) parameters for the bladder, rectum, small bowel, penile bulb, and sigmoid colon. Metrics used for comparison were D2%, D98%, homogeneity, conformity, and dose falloff for the PTV and D2%, Dmean, V80%, V60%, and V40% for OARs. Statistical differences were evaluated with a paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test with a significance level of .05. ResultsFor the PTV, there were no statistically significant differences in Dmean, D2cc, conformation number, and homogeneity index values, but the dose falloff parameters, R50 and R25, showed a median improvement of 6.7% (P<.01) and 6.2% (P<.01), respectively, with 10 MV. A correlation between patient anterior-posterior distance (dAP) and percentage reduction in R50 of 0.436% per centimeter (P<.01) was determined. For OARs, statistically significant reductions in dose metrics were found in the small bowel and bladder, but increases in the D2cc of 3.5% in the penile bulb (P<.01) and 0.2% in the rectum (P=.02) were shown with 10 MV. The use of 10 MV also demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the total number of monitor units of 15.9% (P<.01) compared with 6 MV. ConclusionsThe study showed that 10 MV provides a faster dose falloff than 6 MV for patients whose prostate and pelvic lymph nodes are treated using a VMAT technique irrespective of body habitus; however, the improvement in dose falloff is dependent on body habitus and increases as the patient body habitus increases.

SU‐E‐T‐617: Plan Quality Estimation of Intensity‐Modulated Radiotherapy Cases for Lung Cancer

Purpose:To estimate the planning quality of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer cases and to provide preliminary data for the development of a planning quality assurance algorithm.Methods:42 IMRT plans previously used in cases of solitary lung cancers were collected. Organs in or near the thoracic cavity, such as lung (ipsilateral, contralateral), heart, liver, esophagus, cord and bronchus were considered as organs at risk (OARs) in this study. The coverage index (CVI), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), volume, irregularity (standard deviation of center‐surface distance) were used to compare PTV dose characteristics. The effective uniform dose (EUD), V10Gy, and V20Gy of the OARs were used to compare OAR dose characteristics.Results:Average CVI, CI, HI values were 0.9, 0.8, 0.1, respectively. CVI and CI had narrow Gaussian distribution curves without a singular value, but one case had a relatively high (0.25) HI because of location and irregular shape (Irregularity of 18.5 when average was 12.5) of PTV. EUDs tended to decrease as OAR‐PTV distance increased and OAR‐PTV overlap volume decreased.Conclusion:This work indicates the potential for significant plan quality deviation of similar lung cancer cases. Considering that this study were from a single department, differences in the treatment results for a given patient would be much more pronounced if multiple departments (and therefore more planners) were involved. Therefore, further examination of QA protocols is needed to reduce deviations in radiation treatment planning.

Hippocampus-Sparing Whole-Brain Radiotherapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Multiple Brain Metastases From Lung Adenocarcinoma: Early Response and Dosimetric Evaluation.

In this study, the volume response and treatment outcome after hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) using tomotherapy were evaluated. Patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma and multiple brain metastases who had a Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 and exhibited well-controlled extracranial disease were treated. The prescribed dose was administered in 10 to 14 fractions as 25 to 28 Gy to whole-brain parenchyma, as 40 to 48 Gy to the gross metastatic lesion, and as 30 to 42 Gy to a 5-mm margin to the metastatic lesion. Double-dose gadolinium contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1-mm slice thickness was performed before treatment and at 1, 4, and 7 months post-treatment. The tumor volume reduction ratio was calculated for each follow-up. Between July 2011 and September 2012, 11 patients with 70 lesions were included in this analysis. The median number of lesions per patient was 4 (range, 2-15). The median initial tumor volume was 0.235 cm(3) (range, 0.020-10.140 cm(3)). The treatment plans were evaluated regarding conformation number (CN), target coverage (TC), and homogeneity index (HI). The median follow-up duration was 14 months (range, 3-25 months) and the 1-year intracranial control rate was 67%. The tumor volume reduction was most prominent during the first month with a median reduction rate of 0.717 (range, -0.190 to 1.000). Complete remission was seen in 22 (33%) lesions, and 45 (64%) lesions showed more than 65% reduction in tumor volume. The CN, TC, and HI values were comparable to that of previous studies, and the mean hippocampal dose was 13.65 Gy. No treatment breaks or ≥ G3 acute toxicities were observed during or after treatment. The HS-WBRT with SIB in patients with multiple brain metastases was effective and feasible for volume reduction and showed excellent intracranial control.

Is linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy better than helical tomotherapy in the radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) are currently the two state-of-the-art rotational intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). When compared with conventional IMRT, linac-based VMAT can shorten the treatment time while HT has been claimed to produce a better dosimetric outcome. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether the more “efficient” VMAT can produce a comparable or better dosimetric outcome when compared with HT for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Sixteen primary NPC patients treated by HT were recruited. In addition to the original HT plans, two-arc VMAT plans using the same patient data and dose requirements were generated for each patient. The dosimetric evaluation of the plans included the comparison of conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), dose to 2 and 98 % volume (D 2 and D 98) of the planning target volume (PTV) of the NP, and left and right lymphatic regions. For the organs at risk (OARs), maximum dose or D 2 and mean dose were used for serial and parallel organs, respectively. Student’s paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to check for significant difference. The dose to the NP target was similar between the two techniques. For the nodal targets, the VMAT plans produced higher mean D 2 and lower HI values. For the OARs, the spinal cord and spinal cord doses were higher in the VMAT plans than in the HT plans, whereas the opposite happened in the optic chiasm and pituitary gland. The doses to the brain stem, lens, and optic nerve did not show a significant difference. Both systems delivered satisfactory dose distributions and kept the dose to OARs below their tolerance. However, if the parotid gland toxicity is a concern in the treatment, HT would be more favorable because it is relatively more effective in sparing the parotid gland. Otherwise, the linac-based double-arc VMAT would be recommended because of its shorter treatment time.

Evaluation of treatment plans using various treatment techniques for the radiotherapy of cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma developed on the skin of feet.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the plan qualities of various treatment modalities for the radiotherapy of cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma developed on the skin of the foot. A total of six virtual targets were generated on the skin of the foot in CT images. Five types of treatment plans were generated using photon beams (PB), electron beams (EB), high‐dose‐rate (HDR) brachytherapy with a Freiburg flap applicator, intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. Plans for each of the six targets (single‐target plans) and also for the combined target consisting of the six single targets combined (multitarget plans) were generated. Dose‐volumetric analysis was performed for the targets and normal tissues. The averaged conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) values for each single target using PB, EB, HDR, IMRT, and VMAT techniques were 1.97, 2.39, 1.60, 4.60, and 0.80 and 1.05, 1.11, 1.52, 1.04, and 1.04, respectively. For the multitarget, the CI values were 3.99, 5.08, 1.38, 1.95, and 0.84, and the values of HI were 1.10, 1.36, 1.43, 1.06, and 1.04, respectively. The averaged mean doses to normal tissue were 2.5, 2.7, 3.6, 1.7, and 2.9 Gy for single‐target plans, and 21.3, 14.6, 14.2, 14.3, and 13.0 Gy for the multitarget plans, respectively. The VMAT demonstrated dosimetric advantages and better treatment efficiency over other techniques for the radiotherapy of multifocal skin disease of the feet.PACS number: 87.55.dk

The Impact of Body Mass Index on Radiotherapy Technique in Patients With Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer

We aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index on radiotherapy (RT) technique in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study and divided into 3 groups with respect to their body mass index (normal weight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m; overweight, 25-29.9 kg/m; obese, 30-39.9 kg/m). Treatment plans using field-in-field (FIF) and 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) were compared for the doses in the planning target volume (PTV), organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes, dose homogeneity index, and monitor unit counts required for the treatment. The FIF technique was superior to 3D-CRT with respect to the maximum and mean doses received by OAR and dose homogeneity index values. The subgroup analyses revealed that the maximum dose received by the right femur and the mean doses received by the rectum and bladder were significantly reduced only in obese patients (Ps = 0.021, 0.008, and 0.008, respectively). The FIF technique significantly reduced the PTV volumes irradiated with greater than 105% of the prescribed dose (P < 0.001). The volumes of bowel and bone marrow receiving more than the prescribed dose of 30 Gy were significantly reduced only in obese patients (Ps = 0.025 and 0.043, respectively). The volumes of bladder, bowel, and bone marrow receiving more than the prescribed dose of 45 Gy were significantly reduced in only obese patients (Ps = 0.011, 0.011, and 0.008, respectively). Considering the lower maximum doses in OAR and PTV, we demonstrate the FIF technique to be more advantageous than 3D-CRT during adjuvant RT for early-stage endometrial cancer patients. This advantage is more prominent in obese patients. Therefore, FIF technique represents an effective pelvic RT treatment option for obese patients in clinics that do not have access to or prefer an alternative to intensity-modulated RT.

O2.03 * TARGET DELINEATION IN GLIOBLASTOMA: IS PREOPERATIVE AUTOMATIC COMPARABLE TO EXPERT BASED SEGMENTATION?

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate preoperative automatic structure segmentation of glioblastoma patients undergoing radiation therapy in clinical practice. METHOD: Automatic tumor segmentation was performed on preoperative MR images using the Brain Tumor Software Analysis (BraTumIA) software (www.istb.unibe.ch). We compared manual tumor volumetry based on postoperative MR images of 14 GBM patients (7 patients received 60 Gy/30 fractions; 7 other patients received 39.9 Gy/15 fractions) to the automatic approach. We employed four standard MRI sequences (T1, T1contrast, T2 and FLAIR) in order to segment the tumor sub-compartments (contrast enhancing tumor; CET, necrosis, non enhancing tumor; NET and edema). Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Mean Surface Distance (MSD) were calculated to evaluate the quality of segmentations. For the evaluation of the dose deposition in GTV, CTV, CET, necrosis, NET and edema, an analysis of the following dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters has been performed: D2%, D90%, D95%, D98% (dose exceeded in 2%, 90%, 95%, 98% of the volume) and Dmean (mean dose). Furthermore, the same DVH analysis of the composite structure “complete tumor volume +” (TV +) encompassing the CET, the necrosis, the NET and the edema has also been carried out. Based on these histograms a homogeneity index (HI) has been defined as HI = (D2% - D98%) / Dp * 100 where Dp is the prescribed dose. RESULT: DSC and MSD mean/SD overlap between automatic segmentation and manual contours was 0.52 ± 0.20; 5.1 ± 4.0 mm for necrotic tissue combined with CET vs GTV;0.62 ± 0.18 and 8.2 ± 5.1 mm for TV+ vs CTV, respectively. No significant differences were observed between means of D2% D90% D95%, D98% and Dmean in GTV, CET and necrosis. Differences were found between the means of D98% in CTV60Gy and TV + 60Gy (p = 0.006) and CTV39.9Gy and TV + 39.9Gy (p = 0.033). Despite a good mean HI in PTV (8.1 ± 3.0) %, we found a higher mean value for TV+ (49.7 ± 41.1)%. These findings were due to false positives in the segmentation of the edema compartment of the TV+ in 4 out of 14 patients. This could indicate a weakness of BraTumIA in the segmentation of the edema compartment. CONCLUSION: Automated volumetry on preoperative MR revealed only subtle volume differences for the necrotic and enhancing tumor segments and postoperatively delineated GTV, whereas non-enhancing tumor plus edema volumes vs CTV were discordant. The DVH evaluation highlighted an underdosage of the edema in the D98% regions causing high HI values. Our data suggest that preoperative automatic volumetry adds converging information to adapt CTV of patients with GBM (including CET, necrosis and NET). The incorporation of the complete edema into the target volume has still to be addressed.

The impact of body mass index on radiotherapy technique in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: A single-center dosimetric study

OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the impact of body mass index on radiotherapy (RT) technique in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study and divided into 3 groups with respect to their body mass index (normal weight, 18.5-24.9 kg/m; overweight, 25-29.9 kg/m; obese, 30-39.9 kg/m). Treatment plans using field-in-field (FIF) and 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) were compared for the doses in the planning target volume (PTV), organs-at-risk (OAR) volumes, dose homogeneity index, and monitor unit counts required for the treatment. RESULTS The FIF technique was superior to 3D-CRT with respect to the maximum and mean doses received by OAR and dose homogeneity index values. The subgroup analyses revealed that the maximum dose received by the right femur and the mean doses received by the rectum and bladder were significantly reduced only in obese patients (Ps = 0.021, 0.008, and 0.008, respectively). The FIF technique significantly reduced the PTV volumes irradiated with greater than 105% of the prescribed dose (P < 0.001). The volumes of bowel and bone marrow receiving more than the prescribed dose of 30 Gy were significantly reduced only in obese patients (Ps = 0.025 and 0.043, respectively). The volumes of bladder, bowel, and bone marrow receiving more than the prescribed dose of 45 Gy were significantly reduced in only obese patients (Ps = 0.011, 0.011, and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Considering the lower maximum doses in OAR and PTV, we demonstrate the FIF technique to be more advantageous than 3D-CRT during adjuvant RT for early-stage endometrial cancer patients. This advantage is more prominent in obese patients. Therefore, FIF technique represents an effective pelvic RT treatment option for obese patients in clinics that do not have access to or prefer an alternative to intensity-modulated RT.

SU-E-T-216: Intercomparison of CyberKnife and GammaKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment Plans for Metastatic Brain Tumors

Purpose: Over 40,000 patients are treated annually for metastatic brain tumors. A common method of treatment for these patients is stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Two commercially available options for treatment of SRS are the CyberKnife and GammaKnife. The purpose of this work was to perform a detailed comparison of the quality of the two techniques for the treatment of metastatic brain tumors using quantitative parameters. Methods: Six patients with small metastatic brain tumors (Range: 2.2cc– 14.6cc) that had previously received SRS treatment via the GammaKnife system were planned for equivalent treatment using the CyberKnife treatment planning system. To quantify the quality of the individual plans, the conformity number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient score index (GSI) were measured and compared. Both plans were created to delivery equivalent tumor coverage (Range: 10–14Gy) to the equivalent prescription volume. This was typically 99% prescription dose coverage to the GTV for both plans. Results: The calculated average HI was 0.497±0.155 versus 0.600±0.049, CI was 0.596±0.159 versus 0.865±0.022, and GSI was 41.4±17.8 versus 65.1±20.09 for CyberKnife vs GammaKnife respectively. Lower HI values imply a higher uniformity of dose throughout the target. CI ideally would be 1.000, and the closest to this value is to one, the better is the conformality to the treated site. High values for GSI implies a steeper dose falloff from the tumor to normal tissue and therefore is preferable. For this study statistical significance was achieved for CI, however due to the small sample size differences in HI and GSI were not statistically significant. Conclusion: This data suggests that SRS treatments on CyberKnife and GammaKnife are of similar quality, with Gamma Knife able to deliver a slightly more conformal plan for the treatment of brain metastases.

Feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost with forward intensity-modulated radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases.

Aim of the studyTo evaluate the feasibility of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) by forward intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with 1–3 brain metastases.Material and methodsTwo forward IMRT plans were implemented among 18 patients. In plan A, the prescribed dose was 30 Gy to the whole brain (PTVWBRT) and 50 Gy to individual brain metastases (PTVboost) delivered simultaneously in 10 fractions. In plan B, the prescribed dose was 30 Gy to the PTVWBRT and 40 Gy to the PTVboost. Plans were evaluated with regard to conformation number (CN), prescription isodose volume to target volume ratio (PITV), target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), and the volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose (V95). Plan A was implemented for 5 of these patients, and plan B was used for the remaining patients.ResultsThe mean values of CN, PITV, TC, and HI for the PTVboost were 0.71, 1.32, 0.97, and 0.07, respectively, for plan A and 0.65, 1.47, 0.97, and 0.05, respectively, for plan B. The mean values of TC, HI, and V95 for the PTVWBRT were 0.98, 0.45, and 99.71%, respectively, for plan A and 0.97, 0.27, and 99.61%, respectively, for plan B. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy (RT) schedule with no acute and late RT-related toxicity greater than grade 2.ConclusionsIt is feasible to deliver WBRT with a SIB via forward IMRT for patients with 1–3 brain metastases with good dose conformity and acceptable toxicity.

Comparison of stereotactic plans for brain tumors with two different multileaf collimating systems

Linac‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been widely used for treating small intracranial lesions. This technique allows conforming the dose distribution to the planning target volume (PTV), providing a steep dose gradient with the surrounding normal tissues. This is realized through dedicated collimation systems. The present study aims to compare SRS plans with two collimating systems: the beam modulator (BM) of the Elekta Synergy linac and the DirexGroup micromultileaf collimator (μMLC). Seventeen patients (25 PTVs) were planned both with BM and μMLC (mounted on an Elekta Precise linac) using the Odyssey (PerMedics) treatment planning system (TPS). Plans were compared in terms of dose‐volume histograms (DVH), minimum dose to the PTV, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI), as defined by the TPS, and doses to relevant organs at risk (OAR). The mean difference between the μMLC and the BM plans in minimum PTV dose was 5.7%±4.2% in favor of the μMLC plans. No statistically significant difference was found between the distributions of the CI values for the two planning modalities (p=0.54), while the difference between the distributions of the HI values was statistically significant (p=0.018). For both BM and μMLC plans, no differences were observed in CI and HI, depending on lesion size and shape. The PTV homogeneity achieved by BM plans was 15.1%±6.8% compared to 10.4%±6.6% with μMLC. Higher maximum and mean doses to OAR were observed in the BM plans; however, for both plans, dose constraints were respected. The comparison between the two collimating systems showed no substantial differences in terms of PTV coverage or OAR sparing. The improvements obtained by using μMLC are relatively small, and both systems turned out to be adequate for SRS treatments.PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.dk, 87.56.nk

Bolus-dependent dosimetric effect of positioning errors for tangential scalp radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy

The dosimetric effect of errors in patient position is studied on-phantom as a function of simulated bolus thickness to assess the need for bolus utilization in scalp radiotherapy with tomotherapy. A treatment plan is generated on a cylindrical phantom, mimicking a radiotherapy technique for the scalp utilizing primarily tangential beamlets. A planning target volume with embedded scalplike clinical target volumes (CTVs) is planned to a uniform dose of 200cGy. Translational errors in phantom position are introduced in 1-mm increments and dose is recomputed from the original sinogram. For each error the maximum dose, minimum dose, clinical target dose homogeneity index (HI), and dose-volume histogram (DVH) are presented for simulated bolus thicknesses from 0 to 10mm. Baseline HI values for all bolus thicknesses were in the 5.5 to 7.0 range, increasing to a maximum of 18.0 to 30.5 for the largest positioning errors when 0 to 2mm of bolus is used. Utilizing 5mm of bolus resulted in a maximum HI value of 9.5 for the largest positioning errors. Using 0 to 2mm of bolus resulted in minimum and maximum dose values of 85% to 94% and 118% to 125% of the prescription dose, respectively. When using 5mm of bolus these values were 98.5% and 109.5%. DVHs showed minimal changes in CTV dose coverage when using 5mm of bolus, even for the largest positioning errors. CTV dose homogeneity becomes increasingly sensitive to errors in patient position as bolus thickness decreases when treating the scalp with primarily tangential beamlets. Performing a radial expansion of the scalp CTV into 5mm of bolus material minimizes dosimetric sensitivity to errors in patient position as large as 5mm and is therefore recommended.

Reduced lung dose during radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma: VMAT combined with active breathing control for moderate DIBH

BackgroundLung radiation injury is a critical complication of radiotherapy (RT) for thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility and dosimetric effects of reducing the lung tissue irradiation dose during RT for thoracic EC by applying volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) combined with active breathing control (ABC) for moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (mDIBH).MethodsFifteen patients with thoracic EC were randomly selected to undergo two series of computed tomography (CT) simulation scans with ABC used to achieve mDIBH (representing 80% of peak DIBH value) versus free breathing (FB). Gross tumor volumes were contoured on different CT images, and planning target volumes (PTVs) were obtained using different margins. For PTV-FB, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was designed with seven fields, and VMAT included two whole arcs. For PTV-DIBH, VMAT with three 135° arcs was applied, and the corresponding plans were named: IMRT-FB, VMAT-FB, and VMAT-DIBH, respectively. Dosimetric differences between the different plans were compared.ResultsThe heart volumes decreased by 19.85%, while total lung volume increased by 52.54% in mDIBH, compared to FB (p < 0.05). The mean conformality index values and homogeneity index values for VMAT-DIBH (0.86, 1.07) were slightly worse than those for IMRT-FB (0.90, 1.05) and VMAT-FB (0.90, 1.06) (p > 0.05). Furthermore, compared to IMRT-FB and VMAT-FB, VMAT-DIBH reduced the mean total lung dose by 18.64% and 17.84%, respectively (p < 0.05); moreover, the V5, V10, V20, and V30 values for IMRT-FB and VMAT-FB were reduced by 10.84% and 10.65% (p > 0.05), 12.5% and 20% (p < 0.05), 30.77% and 33.33% (p < 0.05), and 50.33% and 49.15% (p < 0.05), respectively. However, the heart dose-volume indices were similar between VMAT-DIBH and VMAT-FB which were lower than IMRT-FB without being statistically significant (p > 0.05). The monitor units and treatment time of VMAT-DIBH were also the lowest (p < 0.05).ConclusionsVMAT combined with ABC to achieve mDIBH is a feasible approach for RT of thoracic EC. Furthermore, this method has the potential to effectively reduce lung dose in a shorter treatment time and with better targeting accuracy.

Comparison of dosiology between three dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapies (5 and 7 fields) in gastric cancer post-surgery

The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 7 and 5 fields as well as 3-D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans for gastric cancer using dosimetric analysis. In 15 patients with gastric cancer after D1 resection, dosimetric parameters for IMRT (7 and 5 fields) and 3D-CRT were calculated with a total dose of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/day). These parameters included the conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), maximum dose spot for the planned target volume (PTV), dose-volume histogram (DVH) and dose distribution in the organs at risk (OAR), mean dose (Dmean), maximal dose (Dmax) in the spinal cord, percentage of the normal liver volume receiving more than 30 Gy (V30) and percentage of the normal kidney volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20). IMRT (7 and 5 fields) and 3D-CRT achieved the PTV coverage. However, IMRT presented significantly higher CI and HI values and lower maximum dose spot distribution than 3D-CRT (P=0.001). For dose distribution of OAR, IMRT had a significantly lower Dmean and Dmax in spinal cord than 3D-CRT (P=0.009). There was no obvious difference in V30 of liver and V20 of kidney between IMRT and 3D-CRT, but 5-field IMRT showed lower Dmean in the normal liver than other two plans (P=0.001). IMRT revealed favorable tumor coverage as compared to 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Specifically, 5-field IMRT plan was superior to 3D-CRT in protecting the spinal cord and liver, but this superiority was not observed in the kidney. Further studies are needed to compare differences among the three approaches.

Proton Arc Reduces Range Uncertainty Effects and Improves Conformality Compared With Photon Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

To describe, in a setting of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the theoretical dosimetric advantages of proton arc stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in which the beam penumbra of a rotating beam is used to reduce the impact of range uncertainties. Thirteen patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with proton SBRT underwent repeat planning with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (Photon-VMAT) and an in-house-developed arc planning approach for both proton passive scattering (Passive-Arc) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT-Arc). An arc was mimicked with a series of beams placed at 10° increments. Tumor and organ at risk doses were compared in the context of high- and low-dose regions, represented by volumes receiving >50% and <50% of the prescription dose, respectively. In the high-dose region, conformality index values are 2.56, 1.91, 1.31, and 1.74, and homogeneity index values are 1.29, 1.22, 1.52, and 1.18, respectively, for 3 proton passive scattered beams, Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT. Therefore, proton arc leads to a 30% reduction in the 95% isodose line volume to 3-beam proton plan, sparing surrounding organs, such as lung and chest wall. For chest wall, V30 is reduced from 21 cm(3) (3 proton beams) to 11.5 cm(3), 12.9 cm(3), and 8.63 cm(3) (P=.005) for Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT, respectively. In the low-dose region, the mean lung dose and V20 of the ipsilateral lung are 5.01 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), 4.38 Gy(RBE), 4.91 Gy(RBE), and 5.99 Gy(RBE) and 9.5%, 7.5%, 9.0%, and 10.0%, respectively, for 3-beam, Passive-Arc, IMPT-Arc, and Photon-VMAT, respectively. Stereotactic body radiation therapy with proton arc and Photon-VMAT generate significantly more conformal high-dose volumes than standard proton SBRT, without loss of coverage of the tumor and with significant sparing of nearby organs, such as chest wall. In addition, both proton arc approaches spare the healthy lung from low-dose radiation relative to photon VMAT. Our data suggest that IMPT-Arc should be developed for clinical use.

The impacts of dental filling materials on RapidArc treatment planning and dose delivery: Challenges and solution

The presence of high-density material in the oral cavity creates dose perturbation in both downstream and upstream directions at the surfaces of dental filling materials (DFM). In this study, the authors have investigated the effect of DFM on head and neck RapidArc treatment plans and delivery. Solutions are proposed to address (1) the issue of downstream dose perturbation, which might cause target under dosage, and (2) to reduce the upstream dose from DFM which may be the primary source of mucositis. In addition, an investigation of the clinical role of a custom-made plastic dental mold∕gutter (PDM) in sparing the oral mucosa and tongue reaction is outlined. The influence of the dental filling artifacts on dose distribution was investigated using a geometrically well-defined head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) verification phantom (PTW, Freiberg, Germany) with DFM inserts called amalgam, which contained 50% mercury, 25% silver, 14% tin, 8% copper, and 3% other trace metals. Three RapidArc plans were generated in the Varian Eclipse System to treat the oral cavity using the same computer tomography (CT) dataset, including (1) a raw CT image, (2) a streaking artifacts region, which was replaced with a mask of 10 HU, and (3) a 2 cm-thick 6000 HU virtual filter [a volume created in treatment planning system to compensate for beam attenuation, where the thickness of this virtual filter is based on the measured percent depth dose (PDD) data and Eclipse calculation]. The dose delivery for the three plans was verified using Gafchromic-EBT2 film measurements. The custom-made PDM technique to reduce backscatter dose was clinically tested on four head and neck cancer patients (T3, N1, M0) with DFM, two patients with PDM and the other two patients without PDM. The thickness calculation of the PDM toward the mucosa and tongue was purely based on the measured upstream dose. Patients' with oral mucosal reaction was clinically examined initially and weekly during the course of radiotherapy. For a RapidArc treatment technique, the backscatter dose from the DFM insert was measured to be 9.25±2.17 in the IMRT-verification-phantom. The measured backscatter upstream dose from DFM for a single-field was 22% higher than without the DFM, whereas the downstream dose was lower by 14%. The values of homogeneity index for the plans with and without the application of mask were 0.09 and 0.14, respectively. The calculated mean treatment planning volume (PTV) dose differed from the delivered dose by 13% and was reduced to 2% when using the mask and virtual filter together. A grade 3 mucosa reaction was observed in the control group after 22-24 fractions (44-48 Gy). In contrast, no grade 3 mucositis was observed in the patients wearing the PDM after 25-26 fractions (50-52 Gy). The backscatter from the DFM for a single, parallel-opposed fields, and RapidArc treatment technique was found significant. The application of mask in replacing streaking artifacts can be useful in improving dose homogeneity in the PTV. The use of a virtual filter around the teeth during the planning phase reduces the target underdosage issue in the phantom. Furthermore, a reduction in mucositis is observed in the head and neck patients with the use of PDM.

Dosimetric analysis of intensity modulated radiotherapy plans having one or more pairs of parallel opposed beams among the set of beams in some special cases

The purpose of this study was to analyze the dosimetric parameters of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with a set of beams having one or more pairs of parallel opposed beams for the pelvis, head-and-neck (H and N) and brain cases having large secondary nodes. We selected three pelvis (carcinoma of prostate with pelvic bony mets), three H and N (two cases of carcinoma of the parotid with large secondary nodes and one case of carcinoma of the base of the tongue with large secondary nodes), and three brain (glioblastoma multiform) IMRT patients. IMRT plans were done with a set of 6-9 beams having one or more pairs of parallel opposed beams. Each plan was done using 6 MV photon energy. Each plan was analyzed on the basis of planning target volume (PTV) coverage with 93%, 95%, 100%, 107%, and 110% of the prescribed dose (PD), organs at risk (OAR) doses, homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and normal tissue integral dose (NTID). The doses to OARs were well within tolerance limits and the PTV coverage for 93%, 95%, and 100% of PD was obtained very well (followed the radiation therapy oncology group criteria 95% and 99% volume of PTV should receive 95% and 93% of the PD, respectively), and values of HI, CI, and NTID were also satisfactory. In summary, very good OAR sparing and PTV coverage were observed in all plans. Hence, it can be concluded that use of one or more pairs of parallel opposed beams in IMRT plans in some special cases as selected for this study offers the benefit in terms of critical target volume irradiation, while maintaining the OAR within tolerable limits.

Homogeneity Index: An objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments

Homogeneity Index (HI) is an objective tool to analyz the uniformity of dose distribution in the target volume. Various formulae have been described in literature for its calculation but there is paucity of data regarding the ideal formula and the factors affecting this index. This study was undertaken to analyze HI in our patients using various formulae and to find out the co-relation between HI and prescribed dose, target volume and target location. A retrospective review of 99 patients was performed. HI was calculated using five different formulae (A-E). The patients were divided in five groups each, based on prescribed dose, target volume and target location and mean HI of each group was analysed to find the co-relation between these factors and HI. When there were multiple target volumes the primary target volume was studied. The statistical calculation was done using SPSS version 16.0. Ninety nine patients were found evaluable with 75 males and 24 females. Ninety five patients were treated with radical intent and four with palliative intent. The sites treated were head and neck (46.4%), Pelvis (17.1%), brain (15.1%), abdomen (12.1%), and thorax (6.1%). The mean prescribed dose was 4304 cGy (centiGray) and the mean target volume was 476.2 cc. The mean value of HI was 1.21, 2.08, 30.13, 21.51 and 1.27 with different formulae. There was considerable agreement between HI calculated using various formulae specially the formulae considering prescribed dose (C, D). On statistical analysis, there was no significant co-relation between the location and volume of target but there was a trend toward better HI with increasing prescribed dose. Future studies with more number of patients can confirm our results.

Conformal stereotactic radiosurgery therapy: plan evaluation methods and results

The purpose of our study was the objective evaluation of micro-multileaf collimator (mMLC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery treatment plans. Forty-seven patients, 71 lesions received static beam conformal stereotactic radiosurgery treatment in our institute between November 2005 and June 2008. Target volume and organs at risk were outlined on a MRI-CT image fusion basis. BrainSCAN 5.31 system (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany) was used for treatment planning, Elekta Presice TS linear accelerator (Elekta Oncology Systems Ltd, Crawley, UK) and BrainLAB m3 mMLC were used for treatment delivery. An invasive head frame, mounted to the treatment table, was used with four screws for patient head fixation. Treatment plans were analysed with objective parameters, such as conformal index (COIN), homogeneity index (HI), coverage index (CI) and healthy tissue relative overdose factor (HTOF) tools. x2 tests were performed between COIN, HI and the geometrical parameters of the target volume (lesion volume - LV, lesion-organ distance - LOD, lesion deformity index - LDI). Mean value of COIN, HI, HTOF and CI was 0.52 (SD 0.13), 1.16 (SD 0.1), 0.88 (SD 0.53), and 0.94 (SD 0.11), respectively. COIN significantly correlated with (p<0.001 in all three cases), while HI was independent of LV, LOD, LDI (p=0.94; 0.14 and 0.72). COIN is similar, HTOF is less than data from the literature. According to our results geometrical parameters of the target volume (size, location, deformation) significantly influence the COIN, but they have no effect on HI.

Helical Tomotherapy for Solitary Lung Tumor: Feasibility Study and Dosimetric Evaluation of Treatment Plans

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of and treatment plans for helical tomotherapy (HT) for solitary lung tumors. Nine patients with stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and three patients with solitary lung metastasis were treated with HT. All patients were immobilized with the BodyFIX system, and the target volume shown on computed tomography in the 3 respiration phases were superimposed onto the 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning system to represent the internal target motion. All patients were treated with 54-60 Gy in 12 fractions over 8 to 13 days. The median follow-up time was 14 months (range: 3-16 months). The overall response rate was 92%. The local control rate at 1 year was 100% with no difference between NSCLC and metastasis. Of 12 patients, one patient experienced Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (RP), and the other patient with severe interstitial pneumonia and emphysema experienced Grade 5 RP. The mean lung dose (MLD) and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) for the normal lung volumes were converted into normalized total dose with an alpha/beta ratio of 3 Gy. The DVH of the normal lung volumes demonstrated that the mean volumes of V(10), V(30), V(50), and V(70) were 40.4 +/- 9.4%, 21.3 +/- 6.4%, and 12.8 +/- 4.6%, and 9.3 +/- 4.2% in all patients, 28.8%, 18.7%, 12.3%, and 10.5% in the patient with Grade 2 RP, and 29.3%, 17.9%, 7.7%, and 5.4% in the patient with Grade 5 RP. The mean MLD of all patients was 13.5 +/- 3.9 Gy, and those values of patients with Grade 2 and 5 RP were 12.9 and 21.8 Gy, respectively. Our study found that only the MLD was significantly correlated with RP >Grade 2 (p = 0.030) using the Student's t-test. Our study found the conformity index value of 1.48 +/- 0.15 and the homogeneity index value of 1.066 +/- 0.023, which suggested the feasibility of using HT to treat lung tumors with hypofractionation. In conclusion, HT is a feasible non-invasive technique for treating solitary lung tumors and achieves high accuracy in terms of dose conformity and homogeneity. The decision of the indications for HT might be required caution in cases in which a severe pulmonary toxicity is predicted from the high MLD, especially in cases involving a severe pulmonary comorbidity.