The impacts of groundborne vibration (GBV) and sound (GBS) induced by railway infrastructure are assessed across the world through different metrics. Many national and international standards can be found for assessing GBV, based either on acceleration (UK, Spain, etc.) or velocity metrics (Germany, USA, etc.). Various frequency and/or time-weightings can be used, and different quantities (running RMS or highest levels) are also considered. Direct comparison between the various assessment criteria and measured metrics is, therefore, difficult. Although no international standard defines GBS criteria, many guidelines suggest such a criterion through a relationship between GBS levels and vibration velocity levels on room surfaces. Different quantities are often used, even for neighboring projects: London’s Crossrail (now Elizabeth Line) and Northern Line extension impact assessments both used maximum vibration velocity levels but with different time weighting (slow and fast, respectively). Arup has amassed a large dataset of vibration measurements through its involvement in many railway schemes over the years. For each of the thousands of train pass-bys, measured at different distances, infrastructure types, operation, and ground conditions, the most common European and North American GBS and GBV metrics are derived and compared to each other to develop statistical relationships and associated uncertainties.