General Christopher T. Begg, Victor H. Matthews, William J. Urbrock, and Rhiannon Graybill 831. Roland Boer, "Multinationality and the Utopian Project: The Case for Actually Existing Israel," Imagined Worlds, 145-59 [see #1548]. In the spirit of Benedict Anderson's work on imagined communities and the role that imposed and constructed differences play in the formation of such communities, B. applies the theoretical concept of nationalism to biblical articulations of "Israel." Against this background, B. makes the argument that whereas prejudices facilitate difference, nationalism promotes community by focusing on the process of imagining community. Israel, he argues, was the product of an intersection of nationalities and also one in which "actually existing Israel" was a simultaneously utopian/dystopian project. As part of his cross-cultural approach, which is important for a social-scientific inquiry like his, B. adduces the intense debate concerning "nationalities" at the turn of the 20th century in Austria, Russia, and elsewhere, and finds currents of similarity between the biblical project and these more recent situations. He consciously avoids anachronism by defining "nationalities" in a way that would satisfy Anderson: what is often meant in usages of the term is what are now problematically called "ethnic groups" within states or kingdoms. Each state is made up of various nationalities so that when one speaks of nationalism, one is speaking of distinct political and cultural identities within a state. Nationalism in other words, as Anderson has argued, is an imagined framework for political communities with a constructive, if not utopian intent, i.e. building a world in which the threat of difference is controlled. [Adapted from published abstract, pp. 6-7] 832. [Second Temple] Cavan Concannon, "Remembering the Destruction(s) of the Temple at the Museum of the Bible," NEA 82 (2019) 172-78. C.'s essay explores how objects related to the Jerusalem temple have been employed in theological and political discourse in the modern era. It examines how the Museum of the Bible (Washington, DC) uses a fragment of the retaining wall of Jerusalem's Temple Mount to help created a "pilgrimage" experience for visitors. C. further notes how the Museum's depictions of Jewish society are structured around and in service to NT narratives. He also explores how the Museum depicts the Bible as a remnant of the Second Temple that has survived the destruction and the vagaries of time until today. [Adapted from published abstract] 833. [Ishmael; Genesis 22; Qur'an] S. G. deClaissé-Walford, "Ishmael, the Qur'ān, and the Bible," AcTSup 27 (2019) 148-64. In comparison with his younger brother Isaac, Ishmael is a relatively minor character in the ancestral narratives of Genesis. In Islam, by contrast, which incorporates large portions of the Pentateuch into its own holy book, Ishmael takes on a heightened significance in connection with the sacrifice asked of Abraham by God, taking the place of Isaac as the designated sacrificial victim. This article examines the biblical and the Qu'ranic versions of Abraham's sacrifice from a scholarly perspective and tries to determine the grounds for and validity of the Islamic claim concerning Ishmael's role in that sacrifice. [Adapted from published abstract] [End Page 285] 834. Jan Dietrich, "Empiricism or Rationalism in the Hebrew Bible? Some Thoughts about Ancient Foxes and Hedgehogs," Sounding Sensory Profiles, 57-68 [see #1563]. D. formulates the question he wishes to address in this essay as follows (p. 57). "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one important thing." Taking up this fragment from the Greek poet Archilochus, the English philosopher Isaiah Berlin once distinguished between the fox, which builds upon his many experiences and thereby gets to know a great plurality of things, and the hedgehog, which arrives at one decisive idea and interprets the world accordingly. In the following, my aim is to find out whether the Hebrew Bible is populated mainly by foxes or hedgehogs. Read as a symbol for epistemological systems, the fox represents empiricism, the idea that insight and knowledge are based on the senses. It is sensory experience that creates knowledge. Opinions, sentences, and judgments based on experience may be called a posteriori judgments...