Dynamic Conformal Arc Research Articles

A comparative dosimetric evaluation of dynamic conformal arc therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

PurposeThis study assesses the viability of utilizing dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) as an alternative to volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer, with a focus on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) in free-breathing conditions. Materials and methodsWe selected four non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had previously undergone VMAT SBRT and re-planned their treatment using DCAT. We compared the DCAT and VMAT plans based on dose distribution, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), and total monitor units (MUs). Quality assurance (QA) assessments for both plans were conducted using the Octavius 4D system (PTW, Freiburg, Germany). ResultsThe results showed that CIPaddick was 0.80 ± 0.06 and 0.79 ± 0.04 (p-value >0.05), HI was 1.16 ± 0.03 (p-value <0.05) and 1.07 ± 0.02, GI was 3.91 ± 0.05 and 3.40 ± 0.05 (p-value <0.05), and MU was 1880.42 ± 135.19 and 5020.82 ± 188.03 for DCAT and VMAT, respectively (p-value <0.05). The average gamma passing rate exceeded 95 % with a 2 %/2 mm criteria. The dose distribution displayed remarkable similarity between DCAT and VMAT. ConclusionThe DCAT technique exhibits the capacity to deliver PTV dose distributions comparable to those achieved with VMAT, while significantly reducing treatment duration.

Determining Simple and Effective Cost Functions for an Efficient Volumetric-Modulated Arcs-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Single Brain Metastases Using Monaco® Planning System.

Introduction Volumetric-modulated arcs (VMA) can producedose distributions suitable for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for brain metastases (BMs). The treatment planning and verification for VMA are more complicatedthan for dynamic conformal arcs. The longer the preparation timefrom image acquisition to the start of irradiation, the higher the risk of tumor growth and/or displacement. This planning study aimed to exploit the simple and effective cost function (CF) for establishingsemi-automatic efficient VMA optimizationfor SRS ofsingle BMs. Materials and methods The study population included 30 clinical BMs with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of 0.72-44.30 cc (median 9.81 cc) and a depth of 20-79 mm (median 41 mm). The treatment platform included a 5-mm leaf-width MLC Agility® (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and a planning system Monaco® (Elekta AB). Among various physical and biological CFs available, three combinations consisting of just two or three physical CFs were compared. The Target Penalty CF was uniformly used for ensuring the GTV dose. Three different CF combinations were applied for reducing the surrounding tissue doses: (1) the Conformality alone with the 4-cm margin around target (MAT) that optimizes the limited voxels around the GTV (woQO); (2) the Conformality with the 4-cm MAT and the Quadratic Overdose (wQO_4 cm); and (3) the Conformality with the 8-cm MAT that optimizes the overall voxels around the GTV and the Quadratic Overdose (wQO_8 cm). The prescribed dose was uniformly assigned to each GTV D V-0.01 cc, the minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc. Results Adding the Quadratic Overdose (wQO_4 cm and wQO_8 cm) significantly improved the overall dose distribution in comparison to the woQO, while no significant difference was observed between the wQO_4 cm and wQO_8 cm overall. However, for the GTVs of ≥14 cc, the GTV dose conformity and dose gradient outside the GTV boundary, including the dose attenuation margin, were significantly superior in the wQO_8 cm than wQO_4 cm. In addition, for the GTV depth of ≥41 mm, the GTV dose conformity and the dose concentric lamellarity at 2 mm outside the GTV were significantly superior in the wQO_8 cm than wQO_4 cm. Meanwhile, for the GTVs of ≥10 cc, the GTV dose was significantly more inhomogeneous inthe wQO_4 cm than thewQO_8 cm. In addition, for the GTVs of <10 cc and the depth of ≤40 mm, the dose concentric lamellarity at 4 mm inside the GTV surface was significantly higher in the wQO_4 cm than thewQO_8 cm. Conclusions Applying at least three physical CFs to a GTV and the head surface contouris recommended as an effective and efficient optimization method using Monaco for VMA-based SRS of single BMs. In addition, optimizing the overall voxels around the GTV is suitable for reducing the surrounding tissue dose, especially for large and deeply located lesions. Templating the combination of the three CFs with the detailed settings allows for semi-automated and rapid treatment planning, facilitating the prompt start of irradiation after image acquisition.

Dosimetric Comparison between Simultaneous Integrated Boost Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Techniques in Treatment of Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases

Dosimetric Comparison between Simultaneous Integrated Boost Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Techniques in Treatment of Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases

Consideration of Optimal Evaluation Metrics for Internal Gross Tumor Dose Relevant to Tumor Response in Multi-fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis.

Introduction In stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis (BM), the target dose inhomogeneity remains highly variable among modalities, irradiation techniques, and facilities, which can affect tumor response during and after multi-fraction SRS. Volumetric-modulated arcs (VMAs) can provide a concentrically-layered steep dose increase inside a gross tumor volume (GTV) boundarycompared to dynamic conformal arcs. This study was conducted to review the optimal evaluation method for the internal GTV doses relevant to maximal response and local control, specifically to examine the significance of the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in VMA-based SRS. Materials and methods This was a planning study for the clinical scenario of a single BM and targeted 25 GTVs of >0.50 cc, including eight spherical models with diameters of 10-45 mm and 17 clinical BMs (GTV: 0.72-44.33 cc). SRS plans were generated for each GTV using VMA with a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator and the optimization that prioritized the steepness of the dose gradient outside the GTV boundary without any internal dose constraints. The dose prescription and evaluation were based on the GTV D V-0.01 cc, a minimum dose of GTV minus 0.01 cc. Two planning systems were compared for the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm structures that were generated by equally reducing 2 mm and 4 mm from the GTV surface. The D eIIVs, a minimum dose of the irradiated isodose volume equivalent to the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm, were compared to other common metrics. Results The GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm volumes differed significantly between the systems. In the spherical GTVs, the irradiated isodose surfaces of GTV D 80% and D 50% corresponded to 0.4-1.6 mm (<2 mm) and 1.0-4.6 mm inside the GTV boundary, respectively. In the 25 GTVs, the GTV - 2 mm coverage with the D eIIV varied from 83.7% to 98.2% (95-98% in 68% of the cases), while the GTV coverage with the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV was 20.2-75.9%. In the 23 GTVs of ≥1.26 cc, the GTV coverage with the GTV - 4 mm D eIIVvaried from 1.9% to 55.6% (<50% in 87% of the cases). No significant difference was observed between the GTV D 50% and the GTV - 2 mm D eIIV, while the GTV - 4 mm D eIIV was significantly higher than the GTV D 50%. No significant correlations were observed between the GTV D 50% and the D eIIVs of the GTV - 2 mm and GTV - 4 mm. Conclusions The doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside a GTV have low correlations with the GTV D 50% and may be more relevant tomaximal response and local control for SRS of BM. The D eIIVinstead of the minimum dose of a fixed % coverage (e.g. D 98%) is suitable for reporting the doses 2 mm and 4 mm inside the GTV boundary in terms of avoiding the over- or under-coverage, with consideration tosubstantial variability inminus margin addition functions among planning systems. In VMA-based SRS with a steep dose gradient, the doses 2-4 mm inside a GTV decrease significantly as the GTV increases, which can attenuate the excessive dose exposure to the surrounding brain in a large BM due to the GTV shrinkage during multi-fraction SRS.

Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods.

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target. To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index , RTOG conformity index ( ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( ). In addition, we use indices , , and to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans. The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant. Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

Improving the Efficiency of Single-Isocenter Multiple Metastases Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment

PurposeMultiple brain metastases can be treated efficiently with Stereotactic Radio Surgery (SRS) using a Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc (SIDCA) technique. Currently plans are manually optimized, which may lead to unnecessary table angles and arcs being used. This study aimed to evaluate an automatic 4π-optimization SIDCA algorithm for treatment efficiency and plan quality.Methods and MaterialsAutomatic 4π-optimized SIDCA plans were created and compared to the manually optimized clinical plans for 54 patients who received single-fraction SRS to 2-10 metastases. The number of table angles and arcs were compared with a paired t-test using a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of p<0.05/4=0.0125. The reduction in treatment time was estimated from the difference in the number of table angles and arcs. Plan quality was assessed through the volume-averaged inverse Paddick Conformity Index (CI) and Gradient Index (GI), and the volume of normal brain surrounding each metastasis receiving 12 Gy (local V12 Gy). For a five-patient subset the automatic plans were manually adjusted further. CI and GI were assessed for non-inferiority using a one-sided t-test with the non-inferiority limit equal to the 95% inter-observer reproducibility limit from a separate planning study (corrected significance level p<0.05/(4−1)=0.017).ResultsThe automatic plans significantly improved treatment efficiency with a mean reduction in the number of table angles and arcs of −0.5±0.1 and −1.3±0.2 respectively (± standard error, both p<0.001). Estimated treatment time saving was −2.7±0.5minutes, 14% of the total. The volume-averaged CI and GI were non-inferior to the clinical plans (both p<0.001), although there was a small systematic shift in CI of 0.07±0.01. The resulting difference in local V12 Gy, 0.25±0.04cm3, was not clinically significant. Minor manual adjustment of the automatic plans removed these slight differences whilst preserving the improved treatment efficiency.ConclusionsAutomatic 4π-optimization can generate SIDCA SRS plans with improved treatment efficiency and non-inferior plan quality.

Feasibility of a Single-Fraction Stereotactic Dose of 30 Gy to Solitary Lung Lesions on Halcyon.

Purpose We sought to explore the feasibility of using the current co-planar Halcyon ring delivery system (RDS) with a novel multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture shape controller in delivering a single high dose of 30 Gy to solitary lung lesions via stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods Thirteen non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously treated with a single dose of 30 Gy to lung lesions via SBRT on the TrueBeam (6MV-FFF) using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) arcs were anonymized and replanned onto the Halcyon RDS (6MV-FFF) following RTOG-0915 single-fraction criteria. The Halcyon plans utilized a novel dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based MLC-fitting approach before VMAT optimization with a user-defined aperture shape controller option. The clinical TrueBeam and Halcyon plans were compared via their protocol compliance, target conformity, gradient index, and dose to organs-at-risk (OAR). Treatment delivery efficacy and accuracy were assessed through end-to-end quality assurance (QA) tests on Halcyon and independent dose verification via in-house Monte Carlo (MC) second-check validation. Results All Halcyon lung SBRT plans met RTOG-0915 protocol's requirements for target coverage, conformity, and gradient indices, and maximum dose 2 cm away from the target (D2cm) while being statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) when compared to clinical TrueBeam plans. Additionally, Halcyon provided a similar dose to OAR except for the ribs, where Halcyon demonstrated a lower maximum dose (15.22 Gy vs 17.01 Gy, p < 0.001). However, Halcyon plans required a higher total monitor unit (8892 MU vs 7413 MU, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher beam modulation factor (2.96 MU/cGy vs 2.47 MU/cGy, p < 0.001) and an increase in beam-on time by a factor of 2.1 (11.11 min vs 5.3 min, p < 0.005). End-to-end QA measurements demonstrate that Halcyon plans were clinically acceptable with an average gamma passing rate of 99.8% for 2%/2mm criteria and independent MC 2nd checks within ±2.86%. Conclusion Our end-to-end testing and validation study demonstrates that by utilizing a DCA-based MLC aperture shape controller before VMAT optimization, Halcyon can be used for delivering a single dose of lung SBRT treatment. However, future improvements of Halcyon RDS are recommended to allow higher output rates, rotational couch corrections, and an integrated intrafraction motion management system that will further enhance Halcyon's capability for site-specific single dosage of SBRT.

Optimized scoring of end-to-end dosimetry audits for passive motion management – A simulation study using the IROC thorax phantom

Dosimetry audits for passive motion management require dynamically-acquired measurements in a moving phantom to be compared to statically calculated planned doses. This study aimed to characterise the relationship between planning and delivery errors, and the measured dose in the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) thorax phantom, to assess different audit scoring approaches. Treatment plans were created using a 4DCT scan of the IROC phantom, equipped with film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Plans were created on the average intensity projection from all bins. Three levels of aperture complexity were explored: dynamic conformal arcs (DCAT), low-, and high-complexity volumetric modulated arcs (VMATLo, VMATHi). Simulated-measured doses were generated by modelling motion using isocenter shifts. Various errors were introduced including incorrect setup position and target delineation. Simulated-measured film doses were scored using gamma analysis and compared within specific regions of interest (ROIs) as well as the entire film plane. Positional offsets were estimated based on isodoses on the film planes, and point doses within TLD contours were compared. Motion-induced differences between planned and simulated-measured doses were evident even without introduced errors Gamma passing rates within target-centred ROIs correlated well with error-induced dose differences, while whole film passing rates did not. Isodose-based setup position measurements demonstrated high sensitivity to errors. Simulated point doses at TLD locations yielded erratic responses to introduced errors. ROI gamma analysis demonstrated enhanced sensitivity to simulated errors compared to whole film analysis. Gamma results may be further contextualized by other metrics such as setup position or maximum gamma.

The Impact of Multileaf Collimator Size on Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arcs-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.

To compare the plan quality of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 2.5-mm and 5-mm multileaf collimator (MLC) and investigate the factors' influence onthe differences by MLC size. Seventy-six treatment plans including 145 targets calculated with a single isocenter multiple noncoplanar dynamic conformal arc (DCA) technique using automatic multiple brain metastases (MBM) treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g), and mean dose to normal organs were compared between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC. Then the factors that influenced the differences of these parameters were investigated. The impact of target size was also investigated forCI and GI values of individual targets (n=145), and differences between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC were analyzed. All parameters except for LUF were significantly better in plans with 2.5 mm MLC. Target size was a significant factor for difference inHTOF, and distance between targets was a significant factorfor difference inbrain dose and GI. Among 145 metastases, the average inverse CI was 1.35 and 1.47 with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC, respectively (p<0.001). The average GI was 3.21 and 3.53, respectively (p<0.001). For individual targets, target size was a significant factor in CI and GI both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC (p-value: <0.001, each). CI and GI were significantly better with 2.5-mm than 5-mm MLC. CI was almost >0.67 except for ≤5mm targets with 5-mm MLC. Also, GI was almost smaller than 3.0 for >10 mm targets both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC. MBM with 5-mm MLC was almost fine. However, it may be better to use a conservative margin for larger metastases. It may also be better to avoid SRS with5-mm MLC for patients with ≤5 mm target size.

Integrating cine EPID, dynamic delivery, and the off-axis Winston-Lutz test to enhance quality control in multiple brain metastasis stereotactic radiotherapy

PurposeStereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has transformed cancer treatment, especially for brain metastases. Ensuring accurate SRT delivery is crucial, with the Winston-Lutz test being an important quality control tool. Off-axis Winston-Lutz (OAWL) tests are designed for accuracy assessment, but most are limited to fixed angles and hampered by local-field shifts caused by suboptimal Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) positioning. This study introduces a new OAWL approach for quality control in multi-brain-metastasis SRT. Utilizing cine Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) images, it can be used with dynamic conformal arc (DCA) therapy. However, dynamic OAWL (DOAWL) is prone to more local-field shifts due to dynamic MLC movements. A two-step DOAWL is proposed: step 1 calculates local-field shifts using dynamic MLC movements in the beam-eye view data from the Treatment Planning System (TPS), while step 2 processes cine EPID images with an OAWL algorithm to isolate true deviations. MethodsValidation involved an anthropomorphic head phantom with metallic ball-bearings, Varian TrueBeam STx accelerator delivering six coplanar/non-coplanar DCA beams, cine EPID, and ImageJ's OAWL analysis algorithm. ResultsInherent local-field shifts ranged from 0.11 to 0.49 mm; corrected mean/max EPID-measured displacement was 0.34/1.03 mm. Few points exceeded 0.75/1.0-mm thresholds. ConclusionsThis two-step DOAWL test merges cine-EPID acquisitions, DCA, OAWL, and advanced analysis and offers effective quality control for multi-brain-metastasis SRT. Its routine implementation may also improve physicist knowledge of the treatment precision of their machines.

Evaluation of the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble and its influence on dose

We aimed to investigate the deliverability of dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) by gantry wobble owing to the intrinsic inter-segment break of the Elekta linear accelerator (LINAC) and its adverse influence on the dose to the patient. The deliverability of DCAT was evaluated according to the plan parameters, which affect the gantry rotation speed and resultant positional inaccuracies; the deliverability according to the number of control points and dose rates was investigated by using treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices, respectively. A non-negligible degradation in DCAT deliverability due to gantry wobble was observed in both the treatment machine log files and dosimetry devices. The resulting dose-delivery error occurred below a certain number of control points or above a certain dose rate. Dose simulations in the patient domain showed a similar impact on deteriorated deliverability. For targets located primarily in the isocenter, the dose differences were negligible, whereas for organs at risk located mainly off-isocenter, the dose differences were significant up to − 8.77%. To ensure safe and accurate radiotherapy, optimal plan parameters should be selected, and gantry angle-specific validations should be conducted before treatment.

Dosimetric evaluation of LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with more than 20 targets: comparing MME, HyperArc, and RapidArc

BackgroundTo compare the dosimetric quality of three widely used techniques for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) with more than 20 targets: dynamic conformal arc (DCA) in BrainLAB Multiple Metastases Elements (MME) module and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using RapidArc (RA) and HyperArc (HA) in Varian Eclipse.MethodsTen patients who received single-isocenter fSRS with 20–37 targets were retrospectively replanned using MME, RA, and HA. Various dosimetric parameters, such as conformity index (CI), Paddick CI, gradient index (GI), normal brain dose exposures, maximum organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and beam-on times were extracted and compared among the three techniques. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsAll plans achieved the prescribed dose coverage goal of at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). HA plans showed superior conformity compared to RA and MME plans. MME plans showed superior GI compared to RA and HA plans. RA plans resulted in significantly higher low and intermediate dose exposure to normal brain compared to HA and MME plans, especially for lower doses of ≥ 8Gy and ≥ 5Gy. No significant differences were observed in the maximum dose to OARs among the three techniques. The beam-on time of MME plans was about two times longer than RA and HA plans.ConclusionsHA plans achieved the best conformity, while MME plans achieved the best dose fall-off for LINAC-based single-isocenter multi-target multi-fraction SRS with more than 20 targets. The choice of the optimal technique should consider the trade-offs between dosimetric quality, beam-on time, and planning effort.

Generation of tissues outside the field of view (FOV) of radiation therapy simulation imaging based on machine learning and patient body outline (PBO)

BackgroundIt is not unusual to see some parts of tissues are excluded in the field of view of CT simulation images. A typical mitigation is to avoid beams entering the missing body parts at the cost of sub-optimal planning.MethodsThis study is to solve the problem by developing 3 methods, (1) deep learning (DL) mechanism for missing tissue generation, (2) using patient body outline (PBO) based on surface imaging, and (3) hybrid method combining DL and PBO. The DL model was built upon a Globally and Locally Consistent Image Completion to learn features by Convolutional Neural Networks-based inpainting, based on Generative Adversarial Network. The database used comprised 10,005 CT training slices of 322 lung cancer patients and 166 CT evaluation test slices of 15 patients. CT images were from the publicly available database of the Cancer Imaging Archive. Since existing data were used PBOs were acquired from the CT images. For evaluation, Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were evaluated. For dosimetric validation, dynamic conformal arc plans were made with the ground truth images and images generated by the proposed method. Gamma analysis was conducted at relatively strict criteria of 1%/1 mm (dose difference/distance to agreement) and 2%/2 mm under three dose thresholds of 1%, 10% and 50% of the maximum dose in the plans made on the ground truth image sets.ResultsThe average SSIM in generation part only was 0.06 at epoch 100 but reached 0.86 at epoch 1500. Accordingly, the average SSIM in the whole image also improved from 0.86 to 0.97. At epoch 1500, the average values of RMSE and PSNR in the whole image were 7.4 and 30.9, respectively. Gamma analysis showed excellent agreement with the hybrid method (equal to or higher than 96.6% of the mean of pass rates for all scenarios).ConclusionsIt was first demonstrated that missing tissues in simulation imaging could be generated with high similarity, and dosimetric limitation could be overcome. The benefit of this study can be significantly enlarged when MR-only simulation is considered.

Effect of prescription isodose line on tissue sparing in linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery treating multiple brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs.

Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay for simultaneous management of multiple intracranial targets. Recent improvements in treatment planning systems (TPS) have enabled treatment of multiple brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and a single treatment isocenter. However, as the volume of healthy tissue receiving at least 12Gy (V12) is linked to the probability of developing radionecrosis, balancing target coverage while minimizing V12 is a critical factor affecting SRS plan quality. Current TPS allow users to adjust various parameters influencing plan optimization. The purpose of this work is to quantify the effect of negative margins on V12 for cranial SRS plans managing multiple brain metastases. Using the Brainlab Elements v3.0 TPS (Brainlab, Munich, Germany), we calculated V10, V12, V15, monitor units, and conformity index for seventeen SRS plans treating 2-10 metastases on our Elekta Versa HD (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) linear accelerator. We compared plans optimized using 70%-90% prescription isodose lines (IDL) in 5% increments. Irrespective of the number of treated metastases, optimization at a lower prescription IDL reduced V10, V12, and V15 and increased MU compared to the 90% IDL (p<0.01). However, comparing the 70% and 75% IDL optimizations, there was little difference in tissue sparing. The conformity index showed no consistent trends at different IDLs due to a significant spread in case data. For our plans treating up to 10 metastases, diminishing returns for tissue sparing at IDLs below 80% paired with increasing treatment MU and dosimetric hot spot made optimization at lower IDLs less favorable. In our clinic, after consulting with a physician, it was determined that optimization at the 80% IDL achieved the best balance of V12, treatment MU, and maximum dose. Clinics implementing LINAC-based SRS programs may consider using similar evaluations to develop their own clinical protocols.

Dosimetric Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy Techniques in Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

Dosimetric Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy Techniques in Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation

A multi-centre stereotactic radiosurgery planning study of multiple brain metastases using isocentric linear accelerators with 5 and 2.5mm width multi-leaf collimators, CyberKnife and Gamma Knife.

This study compared plans of high definition (HD), 2.5 mm width multi-leaf collimator (MLC), to standard, 5 mm width, isocentric linear accelerator (linacs), CyberKnife (CK), and Gamma Knife (GK) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques on multiple brain metastases. Eleven patients undergoing SRS for multiple brain metastases were chosen. Targets and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated and optimized SRS plans were generated and compared. The linacs delivered similar conformity index (CI) values, but the gradient index (GI) for HD MLCs was significantly lower (P-value <.001). Half the OARs received significantly lower dose using HD MLCs. CK delivered a significantly lower CI than HD MLC linac (P-value <.001), but a significantly higher GI (P-value <.001). CI was significantly improved with the HD MLC linac compared to GK (P-value = 4.591 × 10-3), however, GK delivered a significantly lower GI (P-value <.001). OAR dose sparing was similar for the HD MLC TL, CK, and GK. Comparing linacs for SRS, the preferred choice is HD MLCs. Similar results were achieved with the HD MLC linac, CK, or GK, with each delivering significant improvements in different aspects of plan quality. This article is the first to compare HD and standard width MLC linac plans using a combination of single isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy and multi-isocentric dynamic conformal arc plans as required, which is a more clinically relevant assessment. Furthermore, it compares these plans with CK and GK, assessing the relative merits of each technique.

A novel lung SBRT treatment planning: Inverse VMAT plan with leaf motion limitation to ensure the irradiation reproducibility of a moving target

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMATLSL) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMATLSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and was a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect, and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieved with full VMAT.

RADT-21. LINEAR ACCELERATOR BASED RADIOSURGERY WITH DYNAMIC CONFORMAL ARCS FOR PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract PURPOSE Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is gaining popularity as an alternative due to its high delivery efficiency and improved accessibility. This study focuses on the radiosurgery protocol of a single institution, utilizing single-isocenter multi-target SRS treatment with an inverse-optimized dynamic conformal arc technique. Materials &amp; METHODS A prospective cohort study was conducted from August 2020. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Patients with brain tumors referred for SRS were treated based on the indications. Prescription doses were determined by target size and radiation oncologists. The protocol included a 1-2 mm expansion of tumors for the planning target volume (PTV), with a requirement of at least 85% PTV coverage. At least three non-coplanar arcs are needed. Competing risk survival analysis was used to assess the cumulative incidence of failure. RESULTS A total of 57 patients with 190 brain tumors underwent SRS in this study. 12 patients (21.1%) received at least 2 radiation courses for recurrent lesions. Tumor sizes ranged from 0.45 to 8.0 cm (median 1.41 cm). The maximal dose relation ranged between 71.5% and 91.4% (median 81.6). The conformal index ranged from 1.08 to 2.19 (median 1.19), and the dose gradient index ranged from 2.19 to 6.95 (median 3.59). The 1-year cumulative incidence of local failure and intracranial distant failure rates were 10.8% and 35.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION LINAC-based SRS using dynamic conformal arcs achieves optimal tumor coverage and a high dose gradient with ease. It demonstrates a low rate of local failure, effectively protects normal brain tissue, and allows for the postponement of whole brain radiotherapy, enabling patients to maintain a normal quality of life. In conclusion, LINAC-based SRS with dynamic conformal arcs may be a beneficial treatment option for brain metastases, even with a high lesion count, particularly in institutions equipped with LINAC.

A target definition based on electroanatomic maps for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation

PurposeIdentifying the target region is critical for successfully treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) with single fraction stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR). We report the feasibility of target definition based on direct co-registration of electroanatomic maps (EAM) and radioablation planning images. Materials and methodsThe EAM consists of 3D cardiac anatomy representation with electrical activity at endocardium and is acquired by a cardiac electrophysiologist (CEP) during electrophysiology study. The CEP generates an EAM using a 3D cardiac mapping system anticipating radioablation planning. Our in-house software read these non-DICOM EAMs, registered them to a planning image set, and converted them to DICOM structure files. The EAM based target volume was finalized based on a consensus of CEPs, radiation oncologists and medical physicists, then expanded to ITV and PTV. The simulation, planning, and treatment is performed with a standard STAR technique: a single fraction of 25 Gy using volumetric-modulated arc therapy or dynamic conformal arc therapy depending on the target shape. ResultsSeven patients with refractory VT were treated by defining the target based on registering EAMs on the planning images. Dice similarity indices between reference map and reference contours after registration were 0.814 ± 0.053 and 0.575 ± 0.199 for LV and LA/RV, respectively. ConclusionsThe quality of the transferred EAMs on the MR/CT images was sufficient to localize the treatment region. Five of 7 patients demonstrated a dramatic reduction in VT events after 6 weeks. Longer follow-up is required to determine the true safety and efficacy of this therapy using EAM-based direct registration method.

Automatic Treatment Planning for Multi-focal Dynamic Conformal Arc GRID Therapy for Late-Stage Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Study

Palliative management of large, symptomatic pulmonary lesions, either as primary lung cancers or metastases, can be challenging due to need to balance effective radiation doses for cytoreduction with safety. Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT), or GRID Therapy, is an emerging technique, which delivers ablative doses of radiotherapy to small, selected areas of tumor, while sparing organs-at-risk (OARs), and has been shown to debulk large lesions in preliminary studies. Conventionally, an alloy GRID block is manufactured to deliver GRID therapy. However, this delivery technique poses a challenge due to need for block, and dosimetrically when the tumor is deep-seated as excess dose may be delivered to OARs, such as skin and chest wall. This study aims to develop a fast, automatic planning solution using multi-focal dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) on modern Linear Accelerator. One late-stage lung cancer patient with simulated sphere target grid was included in this study. The sphere targets are 1.5cm in diameter and 4.3cm spacing. Four co-planar full arcs were used for optimization. The problem is formalized as finding optimal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) sequencing to cover N targets with K control points (CPs) for each arc. The state of each target's MLC opening at each CP is binary. In order to solve this NP-hard problem, the optimal solution was approximated by eliminating projection collision at each CP. MLC motion continuity and maximum speed were included in the cost function to ensure deliverability. The optimization started with randomized initial CP apertures, followed by solving state-transition equations for following CPs. Two grid arrays (9 and 10 targets respectively) were tested for plan quality. For each grid of target, the arc collimator angle was planned with 0 and 30 degrees for comparison. Prescription was 20 Gy per fraction. Monte Carlo simulation dose engine from matRad toolkit was used for dose calculation. Key dosimetric endpoints including target mean dose, D5%(Gy) and D95%(Gy), were reported. Average calculation time on the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 × 6-Core 3.7GHz CPU and 32GB RAM platform varied from 31 to 44 minutes. One zero-degree collimator and one thirty-degree collimator were generated for each target array. For nine-target array, mean target dose from both plans ranged from 23.41 to 26.55 Gy, while D5%(Gy) and D95%(Gy) ranged from 25.45 to 30.16 Gy, and 20.00 to 22.21 Gy, respectively. For ten-target array, the range of target mean, D5%(Gy) and D95%(Gy) were 23.82 to 28.74 Gy, 26.50 to 33.11 Gy, and 20.00 to 22.49 Gy. A fast, automatic planning solution for multi-focal DCA GRID therapy was developed. It provides clinically feasible plans with high efficiency for small target arrays for the late-stage cancer patient. The implementation provides excellent coverage for deep-seated tumors where alloy grid solution could fail to meet coverage objectives. Additional patients are needed in the future to further refine the technique.