In his late work on inherited concepts, Jacques Derrida's attention became increasingly focused on deconstructive critique of sovereignty, and he suggested more than once that represents a key site deconstruction of sovereignty is possible. Across his writings in this period, Derrida argued that principle of sovereignty invoked by modern, secular nation-state in fact has its roots in a fundamentally theological logic, uncritical, and wholly deconstructible, concept of a unitary, autonomous sovereign who, in end, resembles a kind of God. This same logic governs concept of individual sovereignty, Derrida suggests. Accordingly, in texts we have from this period, Derrida repeatedly indicates that marks one of places critique of sovereignty is in some sense already underway. As he put it in his most sustained treatment of this theme, an address to States General of in 2000 (published in English as Psychoanalysis Searches States of Its Soul: Impossible Beyond of a Sovereign Cruelty), principle of sovereignty ultimately stands for the autonomy and omnipotence of subject-individual or state-freedom, egological will, conscious intentionality.1 notion of sovereignty therefore includes a whole set of concepts that from very beginning, begins to put into question. thought of unconscious, Derrida notes here and elsewhere, is, after all, precisely thought of what undermines and disrupts 'the autonomy and omnipotence of subject' and 'egological will.' Viewed from this perspective, would be a theory and a practice that essentially devotes itself to idea that there is something that undercuts individual sovereignty: namely, presence of another system in psyche that determines human thought and action from a place entirely beyond conscious intentionality. What drives human thought and action, on this view, is in fact something fundamentally incompatible with consciousness. Thus, in Psychoanalysis Searches, Derrida locates critique of sovereignty at very heart of psychoanalytic revolution. The first gesture of psychoanalysis, he writes, have been to explain this sovereignty, to give an account of its ineluctability while aiming to deconstruct its genealogy (WA, 244). And from other side, philosophical deconstruction of sovereignty can be understood, he suggests in Rogues, as one way of tak[ing] into account within politics what once called unconscious.2If deconstruction attempts to take into account what unconscious does to politics, and to classical notion of sovereignty, this is in part because, as Derrida makes quite clear in Psychoanalysis Searches, itself has remained remarkably silent on this question. In short, institution of has failed to take up critique of sovereignty that issues from its own most fundamental insight. More precisely, we could say that it has not yet thought through ramifications of its very first gesture, whereby it analyzes, and thus begins to deconstruct, fictional character of sovereignty. That is, it has not yet managed to think through how this insight impacts prevailing concepts and practices in crucial fields of ethics, law, and politics. Hence psychoanalysis's fundamentally confused state, as Derrida terms it, its 'soul-searching' state, on questions of ethics and politics. problem, for Derrida, quite simply, is that psychoanalysis has not yet undertaken and thus still less succeeded in thinking, penetrating, and changing axioms of ethical, juridical, and political (WA, 244). And to this extent, he suggests, it remains unable to think what is happening today in world, precisely in those places where most traumatic . . . most cruel events of our day are being produced, phantasm of sovereignty, as Derrida will call it, drives exercise of sovereign power (WA, 244). …