Abstract

Implicit skill learning occurs incidentally and without conscious awareness of what is learned. However, the rate and effectiveness of learning may still be affected by decreased availability of central processing resources. Dual-task experiments have generally found impairments in implicit learning, however, these studies have also shown that certain characteristics of the secondary task (e.g., timing) can complicate the interpretation of these results. To avoid this problem, the current experiments used a novel method to impose resource constraints prior to engaging in skill learning. Ego depletion theory states that humans possess a limited store of cognitive resources that, when depleted, results in deficits in self-regulation and cognitive control. In a first experiment, we used a standard ego depletion manipulation prior to performance of the Serial Interception Sequence Learning (SISL) task. Depleted participants exhibited poorer test performance than did non-depleted controls, indicating that reducing available executive resources may adversely affect implicit sequence learning, expression of sequence knowledge, or both. In a second experiment, depletion was administered either prior to or after training. Participants who reported higher levels of depletion before or after training again showed less sequence-specific knowledge on the post-training assessment. However, the results did not allow for clear separation of ego depletion effects on learning versus subsequent sequence-specific performance. These results indicate that performance on an implicitly learned sequence can be impaired by a reduction in executive resources, in spite of learning taking place outside of awareness and without conscious intent.

Highlights

  • Implicit learning is defined as the ability to extract statistical covariation from the environment over experience and use this to guide and improve behavior [1,2]

  • A wide range of studies have examined the effects of imposing resource constraints during implicit learning using dual task methodology (e.g., [4,5,6,7]) and the classic SRT (Serial Reaction Time) implicit learning task

  • The smaller sequence-specific benefit at test suggests that the implicit sequence learning rate may have been slowed during training, but it is possible that the depletion effect persisted to and affected test performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implicit learning is defined as the ability to extract statistical covariation from the environment over experience and use this to guide and improve behavior [1,2]. A wide range of studies have examined the effects of imposing resource constraints during implicit learning using dual task methodology (e.g., [4,5,6,7]) and the classic SRT (Serial Reaction Time) implicit learning task. Jimenez and Vazquez [5] suggested that effects of dualtask might be partially driven by intrusions from explicit memory and partially by intrusions from the secondary task information that disrupts the sequential stimulus organization (as in [7]) Across this extensive literature (21 published studies reviewed in [6]), the evidence points to a slowing in the learning rate under central executive constraints, but the effect size is difficult to disentangle from dual-task response timing effects

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call