Conference Website Research Articles

Peer review declaration

• Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors.Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other.Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s).Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other.• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? The criteria used by the reviewers were as follows: - main findings/ advancements the paper makes with respect to literature.- the importance/interest of the manuscript to a specific or interdisciplinary domain.- data sufficiently support the conclusions.- Originality of the work.- reported research design.- strength of the paper.- Clarity of the conclusions.- Quality of the language. The reviewer’s recommendations were: Appropriate for NCFMP2021 with:- Revision- Accept- Reject Yes, of course was the possibility for all authors to resubmit articles after reviewer’s comments. • Conference submission management system: The Conference management system consists in our conference website:https://science.adamasuniversity.ac.in/ncfmp2021/ with the following portal:Conference Registration: Registration submission: Full length paper submission: Full length paperDownload: TemplateDownload: Full length paper (JPCS Format)The NCFMP2021 website has the information about Organizers, Conference theme and topics, Conference committees, Plenary/ Keynote/ Invited Speakers, Conference Registration, Important Dates, Contact Details, Submission procedure & guidelines, Call for papers ( template, Paper template).• Number of submissions received: 70• Number of submissions sent for review: 46 (24 papers are not taken due to unwillingness and clarity)• Number of submissions accepted: 26• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 37.14%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 35• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): All papers have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. The organiser is given the online platform https://www.morressier.com for Plagiarism Check with Turnitin database on the peer reviewed papers to ensure the publication quality.• Contact person for queries: Bimal Kumar Sarkar, Phone: +91 (0) 9910 843 342, Email: bks@physics.org.inPlease submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement.The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Libraries and Archives in the Digital Age

Libraries and Archives in the Digital Age

Peer Review Statement

All papers published in this volume have been reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double Anonymous• Conference submission management system: Submission and registration to our conference were done through a third-party platform and a website, managed by a technical committee. Submission and review processes were all done at the following link https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=rcgeoe2021, unless a difficulty arose in any step of the processes, the communication was done through conference website at https://rcgeoe2021.ugm.ac.id/ and/or by email at rcgeoe2021@ugm.ac.id.• Number of submissions received: 51• Number of submissions sent for review: 45• Number of submissions accepted: 37• Acceptance Rate (Submissions Accepted / Submissions Received × 100): 72.5• Average number of reviews per paper: 1.3• Total number of reviewers involved: 9• Contact person for queries: Name: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Wahyu Wilopo Email: wilopo_w@ugm.ac.id Affiliation: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Recap of the sixth international symposium on intrauterine devices and systems for women's health

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Sixth International Symposium on Intrauterine Devices and Systems for Women's Health was held as a series of seven 2-hour webinars between May 28, 2020, and June 22, 2021. This Symposium featured 48 different presenters and moderators covering a wide range of topics to highlight new IUD issues and update general IUD knowledge, just as it was done in previous symposia dating back to 1962 [1–5]. A total of 1346 people attended remotely to observe the events live. In this article, we share summaries of the presentations from the sixth symposium. These summaries, provided by the presenters, are meant to archive the symposium. This article gives the reader an overview of the topics and identifies the sessions’ moderators and speakers charged with providing the content. Those interested in further detail, references, and information about the speakers can find more information on the conference website: www.iud2020.com. After the summaries, we share ideas for future IUD research and programmatic needs, as provided by Symposium's presenters and organizers. The authors’ summaries are personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the perspectives of the Symposium's organizers or the medical community at large. The Symposium was recorded and the sessions are available for viewing free of charge at the website, www.iud2020.comor on YouTube. As of July 2022, approximately 1700 visitors have viewed the recordings.

Peer review declaration

Allconference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:• Type of peer review: Double-blind, reviewers cannot see the authors information.The process is as follows:➢ In the title page the authors details (names and affiliations) are deleted.➢ Any refer to previous work should be in a passive way with replacement of authors names with “Anonymous” word.➢ Remove references to funding sources➢ Do not include acknowledgments• Conference submission management system: iKNiTO cs: Please visit the conference website https://amme.conferences.ekb.eg/• Number of submissions received: 46• Number of submissions sent for review: 46• Number of submissions accepted:25• Number of withdrawn papers: 3• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received × 100): 54.34 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 3• Any additional info on review process:none• Contact person for queries: Prof. Dr.Shawky Hegazy: shawkyhegazy@mtc.edu.eg

Международная научная конференция «Фундаментальные и прикладные задачи механики», Москва, 7–10 декабря 2021 г. Материалы конференции. В двух частях. Часть 2

Compiled by P.M. Shkapov, M.I. Dyachenko The conference FAPM-2021 was dedicated to the 175th anniversary of the great Russian scientist Nikolai Zhukovsky, “the father of the Russian aviation,” founder of applied aero- and hydro-mechanics, developer of aeronautics theory, founder of TsAGI, founder of the department of theoretical mechanics, professor of the Moscow Higher Technical School and Moscow University. In 2021 the opening of the conference and the first plenary session were held in the classroom of the Nikolay Zhukovsky Department of Theoretical Mechanics at the Bauman Moscow State Technical University with broadcasting for the participants through the Zoom platform. Sessions of the sections were held only in the remote format. Working languages of the conference: Russian and English. Conference website: http://fn.bmstu.ru/coferences-sec-fs/item/1105-fapm-2021

Международная научная конференция «Фундаментальные и прикладные задачи механики», Москва, 7–10 декабря 2021 г. Материалы конференции. В двух частях. Часть 1

The conference FAPM-2021 was dedicated to the 175th anniversary of the great Russian scientist Nikolai Zhukovsky, “the father of the Russian aviation,” founder of applied aero- and hydro-mechanics, developer of aeronautics theory, founder of TsAGI, founder of the department of theoretical mechanics, professor of the Moscow Higher Technical School and Moscow University. In 2021 the opening of the conference and the first plenary session were held in the classroom of the Nikolay Zhukovsky Department of Theoretical Mechanics at the Bauman Moscow State Technical University with broadcasting for the participants through the Zoom platform. Sessions of the sections were held only in the remote format. Part 1 presents Plenary reports, as well as materials from Sections 1 and 2. Part 2 contains materials from Sections 3, 4 and 5. Working languages of the conference: Russian and English. Conference website: http://fn.bmstu.ru/coferences-sec-fs/item/1105-fapm-2021

To Decline or Accept: A Guide for Determining the Legitimacy of Academic Conference Invitations.

After the rise of predatory journals characterized by false claims of legitimacy and a pay-to-publish model, similar "predatory conferences" have become increasingly common. The email inbox of an academic physician can be filled with daily announcements encouraging conference attendance, abstract submission, and often panel or keynote speaker invitations. It therefore becomes important for the plastic surgeon to be able to discern whether these invitations are from "predatory" conferences or legitimate career advancement opportunities, especially early in practice. To aid the invited physician in determining the legitimacy of a conference, we aimed to characterize objective features of conferences for which email invitations have been received and use this information to build a decision-making guide. We analyzed all conference invitations received by the email of one academic plastic surgeon in a 4-month period. These conferences were organized into 3 groups based on affiliation with known professional societies. The following information was collected if available: affiliation with a professional society, type of invitation, conference location, conference format (in-person, virtual, or hybrid), conference title, conference fees, conference organizer, associated journals or publishers, abstract journal submission, grammar, headshots, time to abstract review, and acceptance. There were 56 unique conference invitations. These were categorized into 15 affiliated conferences, 28 unaffiliated conferences, and 17 conferences of undetermined affiliation. Unaffiliated conferences were more likely to solicit speaker invitations ( P < 0.001), claim to be "international" ( P = 0.001), send emails with grammatical errors ( P < 0.001), use unprofessional headshots on the conference Web site ( P < 0.001), and have reduced virtual conference fees ( P = 0.0032) as compared with conferences affiliated with known professional societies. When comparing the attendance and presenter fees of in-person venues, there was no significant difference between affiliated and unaffiliated conferences ( P = 0.973, P = 0.604). Affiliated conferences were more likely to take place in the United States ( P = 0.014). We present a method to quickly assess the legitimacy of an academic meeting by way of a few important questions. Based on our findings, emails soliciting conference speakers, claims of international presence, grammatical errors, unprofessional headshots, and reduced virtual conference fees are all characteristics that should raise red flags.

Peer Review Statement

All papers published in this volume have been reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single Anonymous • Conference submission management system: The submission management was an on website uploading type one. Each abstract was uploaded on the conference website and the papers were sent directly via conference e-mail. • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 51 • Number of submissions accepted: 47 • Acceptance Rate (Submissions Accepted / Submissions Received × 100): 72.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Contact person for queries: Name: Dorin Radu Email: dorin.radu@unitbv.ro Affiliation: Transilvania University of Brasov

Automated system for collecting and processing of organizational data of a student scientific conference

The development of a web-platform for the collection and processing of organizational data of a student scientific conference was carried out. The results of software solutions for automation of organizational stages of the conference are presented: acceptance of submissions, formation of the conference program, preparation of certificates of participants, acceptance of abstracts, formation of reports, statistics, publication of the program, collection of abstracts, certificates on the conference web-site. The developed web-platform of the student scientific conference and related software solutions are made taking into account the features and needs of users. The testing of the web-platform was carried out for three years from 2019 to 2021. As a result of the approbation, technical shortcomings were eliminated and software solutions were finalized. The automated system for collecting and processing of organizational data of a student scientific conference is a subject to further development to form a common portal integrating other student activities.

"Almighty Dirt": A Report on "Caliban's Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium," Trinity College Dublin, 5-7 May 2022

"Almighty Dirt":A Report on "Caliban's Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium," Trinity College Dublin, 5-7 May 2022 James Green For the first time in around three years, I attended an in-person conference. Instead of an abrupt transition from the world of online symposia, this move into the reality of dear dirty Dublin felt, thankfully, smooth and natural. The first thing to say about "Caliban's Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium" is that the conference could easily not have happened at all. Obstacles facing speakers included visa problems and an ongoing global pandemic, and panels as advertised on the website had to be changed as and when needs arose, calling for altruism from one attendee, Jinan Ashraf, who volunteered to move her paper on Joyce's influence on Indian modernism to one of the final panels. That the conference went ahead at all is due to the heroic efforts of its organizers, Casey Lawrence and Graham Price, with assistance from Sam Slote, who managed to put it together while not being in the country, for example, and even picked up a dislocated knee right on the eve of the conference. The second thing to note is that, despite being the first conference to focus specifically on the connections between Oscar Wilde and James Joyce, it felt entirely right that such a comparison be made. In fact, multiple attendees noted almost immediately that it is surprising such a conference had not happened sooner. Joyce treated the topic of Wilde in his Trieste lecture "La Poetà di Salome" and his A Portrait echoes, at least in title, Wilde's Picture of Dorian Gray. The two cultivated a dandyish public persona and foregrounded questions of aesthetics in their work. In light of the difficulties raised by the conference gods, all who attended remain grateful to the organizers and fate itself to allow us to talk about this subject at length. The conference also was marred by the shocking loss of John Paul Riquelme, who was due to give a fascinating paper on Wilde's use of Platonic dialogues in his critical essays, echoed in Joyce's "Scylla and Charybdis." The abstract he submitted is available to view on the conference website, making it likely his final published work. Noting his generosity and enthusiasm, Graham and Casey fondly dedicated the conference to his memory. But his paper showed the richness and queerness of the comparisons to be made between these two bodies of work. On the first day, there was a panel on such queer comparisons: Michael F. Davis queered the complex genealogy of "The Dead" by looking at Wilde's and Anatole France's depictions of Judea in Salomé and The Procurator of Judea, Maureen de Leo considered Wilde's and Joyce's shared silences over homosexuality, while Tim Ziaukas and [End Page 404] Christopher Wells both offered particularly fruitful, searching, and witty readings of Buck Mulligan via Wilde. This panel set the tone of much of the conference's proceedings––rigorous and humorous, politically charged and pleasurable. Another vital theme of the first day was exile. Adrian Howlett, James Green, and Emma Marns, who shared her first-ever conference paper, considered the various routes into Joyce and Wilde's shared status as exiles. One undeniably positive facet of the conference was how welcoming an environment it was for graduate students and early-career researchers. Their papers sat productively alongside those of more senior colleagues, who responded warmly to the insights of junior colleagues. The first day's roster evinces such a range. These talks were then followed by Margot Gayle Backus's enthralling keynote: "James Joyce and Oscar Wilde: Modernism and the Politics of Punitive Child Removal." Spurred by political fury at the practice of child removal as a systematic form of social engineering, from Tudor Ireland to Francisco Franco's Spain and more recent pink scares in the United States, Backus considered with wit, attentiveness, and fluency the shared anxieties of Wilde and Joyce over the loss of children (which, for Wilde, became an all-too-grim reality in his life). In Backus's reading, Joyce's reaction to Wilde's fall became most pronounced...

XXXII IUPAP Conference on Computational Physics

Damien Foster1, Nikolaos G. Fytas1, Charo del Genio1, Ran Holtzman1, Abhishek Kumar1, Susanne Horn1, Alban Potherat1, Martin Weigel2, and Taras Yavors’kii1 1 Centre for Fluid and Complex Systems, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom 2 Institut für Physik, Technische Universität Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, GermanyE-mail: martin.weigel@physik.tu-chemnitz.de The 32nd IUPAP Conference in Computational Physics was held online August 2-5, 2021 with organizational support from Coventry University. The Conference in Computational Physics series of meetings is held annually under the auspices of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) at international locations alternating typically between Europe, the Americas, and the Asian and Pacific regions. It covers all areas of the computational sciences with a relation to physical applications, making it the largest and leading recurrent international meeting in computational physics. Typical topics covered include statistical mechanics and complex systems, soft matter and biophysics, materials and nano-science, fluid dynamics, quantum manv-body physics, quantum computing, lattice field theory, astrophysics, gravitation and cosmology, novel hardware and software, computational physics education, machine learning and algorithms as well as geophysics and porous media. The format combines plenary overview lectures with a broad range of topical parallel sessions featuring invited impact talks as well as oral contributions and poster sessions, complemented by discussion sessions.The organisation of the 2020 meeting was given to the present group of organisers for a meeting to be held in physical presence in Coventry. It was planned for August 2020, but with the advent of the Coronavius pandemic it was decided in April 2020 to postpone the meeting to 2021 with the hope of holding it on site. We were quite confident back then that the meeting could be held face-to-face in 2021, but the virus proved to be more persistent than we had envisaged, such that CCP2021 was held entirely online. While this disappointed some, it also offered a number of opportunities to explore new forms of scientific and social interaction. We used a virtual conference centre constructed in Gather Town that included spaces for poster sessions and exhibition space for sponsors as well as many opportunities for formal and informal discussions among participants. All oral presentations were delivered on Zoom, with the vast majority of talks delivered live and a handful of pre-recorded videos. To support discussions revolving around the presentations, we also ran a discussion space on Slack with channels for each session and a common discussion forum. All oral presentations were recorded and made available to registered participants on the conference website at https://ccp2021.complexity-coventry.org.The conference featured 425 registrations, with 296 fully completed, coming from a wide range of countries, with the most represented being Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Germany, India, France, Russia and China. The program consisted of 15 plenary speakers, listed below, as well as 33 invited talks, 100 contributed talks and 72 poster contributions. The scientific sessions were complemented by cultural presentations as well as the award session for the IUPAP Young Scientist Prizes in Computational Physics which for 2020 and 2021 were awarded to Zhijun Wang and Prineha Narang, respectively. In total, these contributions led to a very exciting program, and the technical setup allowed for a rather interactive meeting. Although the actual experience might not quite have matched up to that of a traditional face-to-face conference, it was felt by many that this meeting format also has its upsides as it is more inclusive, more ecological, more diverse, and more family friendly that the traditional one.All authors of accepted contributions to the conference were invited to submit a full paper to the proceedings. These papers are collected in the present volume, covering all major areas represented at the conference and thus providing an excellent representation of where computational physics research stands today.We would like to thank all participants of the conference, all contributors to the scientific program and all authors of papers in this proceedings volume. Finally, we would like to acknowledge support for the conference by the IUPAP, the European Physical Society (EPS), the Institute of Physics (IOP), Coventry University, Technische Universität Chemnitz, the European Physical Journal (EPJ), Computation (MDPI), Entropy (MDPI), and MapleSoft.List of titles Local organising Committee, International advisory board, Program Committee, Plenary Speakers, Invited Speakers are available in this Pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind. All papers are sent to a committee of anonymous reviews, where they are selected according to subject area. The paper’s quality is assessed by these reviewers. • Conference submission management system: Conference papers are submitted though the conference website. • Number of submissions received: 126 • Number of submissions sent for review: 87 • Number of submissions accepted: 54 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 • Any additional info on review process: none • Contact person for queries: Name : Prof. Yuri Yu. LoginovAffiliation: Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and TechnologyEmail : loginov@sibsau.ru

UK Public Health Science 2022: a call for abstracts

UK Public Health Science 2022: a call for abstracts

Peer review declaration

IV International Conference on Advanced Technologies in Aerospace, Mechanical and Automation Engineering (MIST Aerospace-IV-2021), 10-11 December 2021, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s).• Conference submission management system:Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 20,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors.• Number of submissions received: 29• Number of submissions sent for review: 29• Number of submissions accepted: 12• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 41• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 12• Any additional info on review process:The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper.• Contact person for queries:Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind• Conference submission management system: conference website (http://eic.ft.unnes.ac.id/)• Number of submissions received: 131• Number of submissions sent for review: 112• Number of submissions accepted: 92• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): • Average number of reviews per paper: 4• Total number of reviewers involved: 18• Any additional info on review process: per article was reviewed by 2 reviewers• Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Samsudin AnisAffiliation : Faculty of Engineering Universitas Negeri SemarangEmail : samsudin anis@mail.unnes.ac.id

Seventh International Scientific and Practical Conference «Transfer of Innovative Technologies 2021»

the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Transfer of Innovative Technologies 2021" was held from May 19 to 20 at the Kyiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture. It presented creative ideas, innovative projects and practical developments in the fields of construction, architecture, solving urgent problems of engineering and facility design, environmental protection, current trends in information technology and others. The conference, which was held by videoconference, was attended by domestic scientists, teachers and students of educational institutions, industry representatives, well-known experts from around the world. A total of 128 applications were submitted from one and a half hundred participants, including 15 foreign ones from Australia, Poland, Slovakia, the USA, Kazakhstan, Germany and China.&#x0D; The competition commission determined the best works in the nominations: Presentation, Innovative project, Publication, awarded the Diplomas of the winners of 2021. Participants received Certificates, and the most active − Acknowledgments for their work, international scientific relations and organizational support of the forum. A preprint of the article was published in the Proceedings of the conference (online) and in the journal "Transfer of Innovative Technologies", Vol.4, No.1, and the presentations of the participants were published on the conference website. The best works are recommended for publication in the international scientific journals Transfer of Innovative Technologies, Underwater Technologies: Industrial and Civil Engineering. A decision was made to prepare and hold the next forum in 2022, to involve creative participants and new institutions in innovation activities, and to further integrate them into the world scientific space. The Organizing Committee thanks everyone for the presented materials and implementation of innovative technologies!

EFEKTIVITAS KOMUNIKASI PEMASARAN VIRTUAL TOUR DI MUSEUM KONPERENSI ASIA-AFRIKA KOTA BANDUNG

Virtual tours are a form of online communication marketing born in the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 due to the use of the internet of things as the backbone of movement and connectivity between humans and machines. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of online communication marketing through a virtual tour on the Museum of the Asian-African Conference's website. The operational definition of the variables used was the AIDA variable consists of attention, interest, desire, and action with 14 total indicators. Data collection techniques used were observation, questionnaires, interviews, and literature studies. The researcher used the quota sampling technique by determining the number of samples taken was 100 respondents. The data analysis technique used was a quantitative descriptive analysis using the Customer Response Index (CRI) calculation. The results of this study indicate that the effectiveness of online communication marketing through a virtual tour on the website of the Museum of the Asian-African Conference has an average AIDA score of 3.28, which is on a scale range of 3.25 - 4.0 in a very effective way and has a CRI value of 50.7% of the overall measurement of respondents which means effective.

Om integrationen af videnskabelige og kunstneriske metoder

The paper relects upon the integration of academic-scientiic methods and artistic strategies for art and technology projects that address user participation in a socially deined domain. he paper proposes Luhmann’s relative diference between medium (loosely coupled elements) and form (tightly coupled constituents) as a theoretical and heuristic tool for productive interferences between artistic and scientiic methods. The paper elaborates upon and exemplifies the proposed heuristic through various art and technology projects. (A first (English) version of this paper has been presented at the Art of Research conference in Helsinki 2012 and can be downloaded from the conference website).

Peer review declaration

• Type of peer review: closed, collective. At the first stage, candidates sent their short abstracts when registering on the conference website. Totally, 483 candidates have been registered. The Program Committee pre-selected the submitted abstracts on the basis of the peer review procedure with the involvement of external experts. 286 selected participants were admitted to the conference. Upon the end of the conference, the participants sent in extended versions of their works in the format required for publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. The program committee finally selected 221 articles for publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. • Conference submission management system: Articles were downloaded through the conference website. • Number of submissions received: 483 • Number of submissions sent for review: 483 • Number of submissions accepted: 221 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Contact person for queries: Prof. Alexey E. Zhukov, HSE – St Petersburg, 3(1) Kantemirovskaya str, St Petersburg, 194100, Russia aezhukov@hse.ru