Peer review declaration

Abstract

• Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors.Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other.Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s).Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other.• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? The criteria used by the reviewers were as follows: - main findings/ advancements the paper makes with respect to literature.- the importance/interest of the manuscript to a specific or interdisciplinary domain.- data sufficiently support the conclusions.- Originality of the work.- reported research design.- strength of the paper.- Clarity of the conclusions.- Quality of the language. The reviewer’s recommendations were: Appropriate for NCFMP2021 with:- Revision- Accept- Reject Yes, of course was the possibility for all authors to resubmit articles after reviewer’s comments. • Conference submission management system: The Conference management system consists in our conference website:https://science.adamasuniversity.ac.in/ncfmp2021/ with the following portal:Conference Registration: Registration submission: Full length paper submission: Full length paperDownload: TemplateDownload: Full length paper (JPCS Format)The NCFMP2021 website has the information about Organizers, Conference theme and topics, Conference committees, Plenary/ Keynote/ Invited Speakers, Conference Registration, Important Dates, Contact Details, Submission procedure & guidelines, Call for papers ( template, Paper template).• Number of submissions received: 70• Number of submissions sent for review: 46 (24 papers are not taken due to unwillingness and clarity)• Number of submissions accepted: 26• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 37.14%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 35• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): All papers have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. The organiser is given the online platform https://www.morressier.com for Plagiarism Check with Turnitin database on the peer reviewed papers to ensure the publication quality.• Contact person for queries: Bimal Kumar Sarkar, Phone: +91 (0) 9910 843 342, Email: bks@physics.org.inPlease submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement.The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.