Conference Website Research Articles

8th International School and Conference “Saint-Petersburg OPEN 2021” on Optoelectronics, Photonics, Engineering and Nanostructures

M V Maximov1,2, E I Moiseev2,1, N V Kryzhanovskaya2,1, A E Zhukov2,1 1 Alferov Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education and Science Saint Petersburg National Research Academic University of the Russian Academy of Sciences2 National Research University “Higher School of Economics”moiseev@spbau.com, aezhukov@hse.ru8th International School and Conference “Saint-Petersburg OPEN 2021” on Optoelectronics, Photonics, Engineering and Nanostructures was held on May 25 - 28, 2021. The Organizers of the conference are the National Research University “Higher School of Economics” and Alferov Saint Petersburg National Research Academic University of the Russian Academy of Sciences. More than 300 participants from Russia, CIS countries, Europe and America took part in the conference. The conference consisted of poster reports presented by the young participants (students, PhD students, and young researchers) and topical lectures by invited speakers.Due to restrictions imposed by the city authorities on holding mass events due to the threat of the spread of the COVID-19 infection, this year’s conference was held in a hybrid format at the HSE University (Saint-Petersburg, Russia). Most of the participants were present in person, while the rest could listen to reports and ask their questions on-line. Some of the speakers also made their presentations in a distant format. All performances were recorded and are available for viewing at the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRoRU6T-uM8&t=5s. Posters and video reports of the participants were posted on the conference website https://spb.hse.ru/spbopen/.List of Committees, Conference Photograph are available in this pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind peer review• Conference submission management system: conference website (https://conferences.hcmut.edu.vn/ICCFB2021)• Number of submissions received: 83 papers• Number of submissions sent for review: 83 papers• Number of submissions accepted: 50 papers• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60.24%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper• Total number of reviewers involved: 60 reviewers• Any additional info on review process: All papers were reviewed in two rounds, led by the Session Editors.- Round 1: all papers were sent to 2 reviewers with double-blind process. According to the comments from the reviewers, Session Editors decided the paper status: accept, minor revision, major revision or reject.- Round 2: after revised and corrected by authors, the papers were re-sent to the reviewers for the decision: accept or reject. The final decisions were made by Session Editors.- With accepted papers: the format, the language and the similarity index were checked by Technical Committees. All accepted papers must be oral-presented at the conference.• Contact person for queries:Dr. Tran Tan VietHo Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT, VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnamtrantanviet@hcmut.edu.vn

HIV Prevention in a Time of COVID-19: A Report from the HIVR4P // Virtual Conference 2021.

The HIV Research for Prevention (HIVR4P) conference catalyzes knowledge sharing on biomedical HIV prevention interventions such as HIV vaccines, antibody infusions, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and microbicides in totality—from the molecular details and delivery formulations to the behavioral, social, and structural underpinnings. HIVR4P // Virtual was held over the course of 2 weeks on January 27–28 and February 3–4, 2021 as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continued to inflict unprecedented harm globally. The HIVR4P community came together with 1,802 researchers, care providers, policymakers, implementers, and advocates from 92 countries whose expertise spanned the breadth of the HIV prevention pipeline from preclinical to implementation. The program included 113 oral and 266 poster presentations. This article presents a brief summary of the conference highlights. Complete abstracts, webcasts, and daily rapporteur summaries may be found on the conference website (https://www.hivr4p.org/).

Peer Review Declaration

ADVANCED TRENDS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (ATCE 2021) All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe): Double-blind.Papers must be submitted electronically via: https://scopus-conf.ru/en/advanced-trends-in-sivil-engineering/. All submissions must come in PDF format, conform to the Conference Publishing template, and not exceed 14 pages (including figures, appendices and references). We also welcome survey papers with an increased page limit of up to 15 pages. Together with papers authors also must submit the registration form. Every participant in the conference served by this site, “in any capacity,” must maintain a login and password. The same login must be used for all conferences. Follow the link to register a login, to check and update your personal information, or to retrieve your password. To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation, the first time when you login to a new account, you will be directed to the required opt-in consent form before you can use your account in any capacity for products and services offered through this site. All papers submitted to the conferences supported by this site need to be prepared as compliant PDF files and must be formatted according to the template.• Conference submission management system: the papers were submitted via conference website• Number of submissions received: 61 submissions received• Number of submissions sent for review: 54 submissions were sent for review• Number of submissions accepted: 28 submissions were accepted• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 45,9%• Average number of reviews per paper: 3• Total number of reviewers involved: 40• Any additional info on review process: All the papers submitted to the ADVANCED TRENDS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (ATCE 2021) conferences pass the procedure of reviewing according to the order established by editorial board. All papers are reviewed three times by experts in relevant field. The reviewing process took 40 days. The revised papers were also checked by Editors. All accepted papers meet the following criteria:- Scientific merit and quality of data presented;- Relevance of study to the conference topics;- No plagiarism and autoplagiarism;- Adequate paper structure;- Good English.Members of the editorial board and leading Russian and international experts in corresponding areas of life sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. Conference Editors choose readers for peer review. In the case of the manuscript relevance to the conference profile, established rules and requirements, it is accepted by the editorial board and is sent for the reviewing. Otherwise the article is rejected without further reviewing. Reviewers prepare reviews of articles on a voluntary basis. Reviewers should submit their reviews in a scanned form. The reviewer makes a conclusion about the possibility of publishing an article:• “recommended for publication”• “recommended taking into account the correction of the comments made by the reviewer”• “article must be sent for revision”• “not recommended for publication”.The articles are reviewed and accepted only after at least two positive reviews of three reviewers. After making a decision by the editorial board of the conference to admit the article for publication, the author is informed about it.• Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey KlyuevAffiliation: Candidate of Engineering Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor, Belgorod StateTechnological University named after V.G. ShukhovEmail: Klyuyev@yandex.ru

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box (gdp2021@iep.uran.ru). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries:Name : Nikolay ZubarevAffiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia zubarev@iep.uran.ru

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: Authors submitted abstract and papers using the conference website.• Number of submissions received: 57 • Number of submissions sent for review: 33 • Number of submissions accepted: 33 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:38 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper was considered by 2 reviewers at least. Most of the papers had been sent for revision and some of them for revision more than once.• Contact person for queries: Name : Valentin Bityurin, e-mail:Affiliation: Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences (JIHT RAS)Email : t9772703889@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

The present document contains details on the procedure for reviewing the materials of the third International Scientific and Practical Conference MATHEMATICAL MODELING, PROGRAMMING AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2021.• The type of peer review is double blind peer review.• All the submitted materials, timely received by the conference e-mail conf-ieis@novsu.ru, were considered by the program organizing committee. The program committee identified the reviewers who received the authors’ articles through the conference email. Each article was submitted to two independent peer reviewers with a scientific degree who did not know the name of the author (or the names of authors) of the article being reviewed.All articles submitted for consideration have passed the peer review procedure in accordance with the standards of editorial ethics, with international practice of editing, reviewing, publishing and authorship of scientific publications and the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics –COPE.Plagiarism, improper borrowing, attempts to circumvent plagiarism detection, verbatim copying and paraphrasing of one’s own work (self-plagiarism) without proper justification, copyright infringement is considered unacceptable practices.All articles that have passed the peer review procedure are original works that have not been previously published in other publications in their current or similar form; they have not been reviewed in other editions. Materials of low scientific level are not accepted for publication.• The number of applications received is 105, of which 59 were accepted for work, the acceptance rate (number of applications accepted / number of applications received X 100) was 56%.• Average number of reviews per paper - 1,6.• The total number of reviewers involved is 40 experts in this particular subject area.• Additional information on the process of consideration of materials: only applications, the authors of which had corrected the substantiated comments of the reviewers, were accepted; the articles that received a negative review from the reviewer were excluded from the conference materials.The conference materials submission control system is presented on the official conference website at https://www.novsu.ru/dept/515278/i.454744/?id=1759423.• For inquiries please contact Dr. Oxana Fikhtner, Head of Academic Publishing Development centre of NovSU (Oxana.Fikhtner@novsu.ru).

Peer review declaration

III International Conference on Applied Physics, Information Technologies and Engineering (APITECH-III 2021), 24 September – 3 October 2021, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s).• Conference submission management system: Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 23,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors.• Number of submissions received: 615• Number of submissions sent for review: 615• Number of submissions accepted: 368• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 42• Any additional info on review process: The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper.• Contact person for queries: Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind review process• Conference submission management system: Submission through conference website for abstract and secretariat official email for full paper, conference.p3hh@gmail.com PIC: Aryani iopproceeding.p3h@gmail.com PIC: Fathimah Handayani• Number of submissions received: 89• Number of submissions sent for review: 88• Number of submissions accepted: 78• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 87.6%• Average number of reviews per paper: 3• Total number of reviewers involved: 35• Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Aryani/Fathimah HandayaniAffiliation : Center for Standardization of Sustainable Forest Management Instruments, Bogor, IndonesiaEmail : arianie34@gmail.com/fathimahhandayani@yahoo.co.id

Noticias

Congreso:“PortlandStateInternational Conference on Translation Studies, Cross-cultural Communication, and Chinese Pedagogy”, Portland State University, Portland, OregonOct. 24-25, 2008Deadline for abstracts: May 30, 2008. Send abstracts to Dr. Meiru Liu at lium@pdx.edu or Dr. Xuanmin Luo at luoxm@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn For more information see the conference website at http://ci.oia.pdx.edu or http://www.tsinghua-translation.org.cn Congreso:"International Conference on Intercultural Studies" 9 December 2008, University of Oporto, Portugal. <http://www.iscap.ipp.pt/~cei/congresso.htm> Abstracts of papers in intercultural studies are invited to submit in Portuguese, English, French, German, or Spanish in 250 words and a bionote of 100 words by 15 June 2008 to <cei@iscap.ipp.pt>. Curso:“International Literary Translation Summer School”, The British Centre for Literary Translation.Registration is now open. For more information and registration details, please visit the BCLT website: www.uea.ac.uk/bclt. Revista:“TransLit” Volume 8, An Anthology of Literary Translation.The Literary Translation Collective of the Association of Translators and Interpreters of Alberta (ATIA) is producing the eighth volume of TransLit for publication in spring 2009, in co-operation with the Literary Translators’ Association of Canada (LTAC). TransLit Volume 8 is a special themed issue titled “Poetry and Short Stories of theAmericas”.Send your contribution by July 1st, 2008to Marc Charron and Luise von Flotow, editors of TransLit Volume 8 to the following address: Editors TransLit Volume 8 School of Translation and Interpretation University of Ottawa Arts Building, 4th Floor Ottawa, OntarioCANADAK1N 6N5 Curso:“CETRA 2008 Doctoral Summer Research Programme”, 18-29 August 2008, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. For the provisional programme and for the application procedure and other administrative information, please visit our website: http://www.kuleuven.be/cetra/Summer_School/summerschool.html http://www.kuleuven.be/cetra/programme/programme.html http://www.kuleuven.be/cetra/Summer_School/applicationprocedure.html For additional information: - please contact Reine Meylaerts, CETRA director (reine.meylaerts@arts.kuleuven.be) and/or Steven Dewallens (steven.dewallens@hubrussel.be) Curso:“2008 NidaSchoolfor Translation Studies”, Sept 8-20, 2008, Misano Adriatico (Rimini), Italy, www.istitutosanpellegrino.com/ssmlFor additional information, please contact Dulce Alvarado (DAlvarado@americanbible.org;

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: We conduct paper submission through google form(https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeXKEhsk1vkf2b0_4kmrnlpoihlgIkTV3V khWeK1Y2nhMYdGw/viewform) and the manuscript from author has submitted before the conference through the conference website(http://icroesth3.unhas.ac.id/).• Number of submissions received: Total received abstract = 256 titles• Number of submissions sent for review: 145 titles for abstract• Number of submissions accepted: 104 titles of fullpaper from 145 titles of fullpaper submitted• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 71.7 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 7- 8 papers per reviewer• Total number of reviewers involved: 18 reviewers• Any additional info on review process: There are some steps on review process1. review and acceptanceAt the begin, the abstract is submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page. The submitted abstracts are then collected by the committee for review one by one regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The abstract review was carried out by an internal reviewer. If there are any discrepancies, the abstract will be sent back to participants via email.2. Submission of Full PaperSecondly, uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. This upload and revision activity was carried out on May 31-August 5 20213. Revision of Full PaperAt the revision stage, participants will be requested to make revisions based on the input given by the reviewer, this input is generally in the form of format, language and continuity of each discussion.4. Peer review of Full PaperAt the Fourth stage, full paper previously submitted through system were reviewed following a single blind peer review process. The papers were sent to reviewer that consisted of 18 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Review was conducted on content, language, and format of the paper based on IOP Conference Series. At this stage, Reviewer submit a decision for the acceptance of the papers for publication in IOP Conference Series. 5. Revision of Reviewed Full PaperAs the end, the submitted papers were then subjected to proofread stage and check for similarity using Turnitin program. Subsequently, papers were prepared for submission to IOP Conference Series.• Contact person: Achmad Amiruddin, S.P., M.SiFaculty of Agriculture, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesiaachmad_amiruddin@unhas.ac.id

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Conference submission management system: We conduct paper submission through submission management system with link for full paper submission bit.ly/fullpapersubs and the manuscript from author has submitted before the conference through the conference website(http://fikp.simnasfikpunhas.com/).• Number of submissions received: Total received abstract = 213 titles• Number of submissions sent for review: 211 titles for abstract• Number of submissions accepted: 117 titles of full paper from 211 titles of full paper submitted• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 54.9 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 4-5 papers per reviewer• Total number of reviewers involved: 27 reviewers• Any additional info on review process: There are some steps on review process1. review and acceptanceAt the begin, the abstract is submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page. The submitted abstracts are then collected by the committee for review one by one regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The abstract review was carried out by an internal reviewer. If there are any discrepancies, the abstract will be sent back to participants via email.2. Submission of Full PaperSecondly, uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. This upload and revision activity was carried out on May 31-June 28 20213. Revision of Full PaperAt the revision stage, participants will be requested to make revisions based on the input given by the reviewer, this input is generally in the form of format, language and continuity of each discussion.4. Peer review of Full PaperAt the Fourth stage, full paper previously submitted through system were reviewed following a single blind peer review process. The papers were sent toreviewer that consisted of 27 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Reviewer was given around 2 months to conduct review on content, language, and format of the paper based on IOP Conference Series. At this stage, Reviewer submit a decision for the acceptance of the papers for publication in IOP Conference Series. 5. Revision of Reviewed Full PaperAs the end, the submitted papers were then subjected to proofread stage and check for similarity using Turnitin program. Subsequently, papers were prepared for submission to IOP Conference Series.• Contact person:Prof. Dr. Ir. Najamuddin, M.ScFaculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesianajaunhas@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-Blind or Triple-blind.Although the use of two reviewers per publication was the common practice, in cases where reports were inconclusive, up to three different reviewers were used.• Conference submission management system: Authors were informed of the submission and review process via the MESIC 2021 Conference website (https://www.mesic2021.es/en/). In addition, communication with reviewers was mainly by email and spreadsheets were used to manage the review process.• Number of submissions received: 178• Number of submissions sent for review: 165• Number of submissions accepted: 140• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.65 %• Average number of reviews per paper: 2.42• Total number of reviewers involved: 94• Any additional info on review process: The publications were submitted to the reviewers in accordance with the topics of the MESIC 2021 Conference. In all cases, the reviews were carried out considering the technical quality and presentation criteria required by an IOP publication.The reviewers’ reports about each paper consisted on:• Comments only for Editors:- Plagiarism problems detected or inappropriate self-citations (Yes/No)- Originality/Novelty, Adequate title, Clarity of figures and tables, Scientific soundness, Scientific-technological interest (High/Average/Low/No Answer)- Overall merit (0 to 10 points)- Specific comments (free text)• Comments both for Authors and Editors:- Assessment of general aspects: Essential information included in the ; Adequate Introduction background including necessary references; Scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness notably followed; Methods adequately described; Clarity of expressions and communication of ideas; Results clearly presented; Conclusions supported by the results (Yes/Can be improved/Must be improved/Not applicable)- Fitting to the template format: Fits perfectly/Needs to be better adapted- English language and style: level of improvements required (Extensive editing/Moderate changes/Minor spell changes)- Specific comments and suggestions for authors: free text- Overall recommendation: Accept/Minor revision/Major revision/RejectAfter the first review stage, the Editors analysed the review reports about each paper and decided one of the following actions:• Ask another member of the Scientific Committee for an additional review in case of contradictory reviews.• Ask the authors for improving their paper when “Minor or Major revisions” were decided. In this case, the authors were fed back with the review report aforementioned as “Comments both for Authors and Editors”• Inform the authors about the acceptance of their paper when two positive reviews were obtained.Once the amended papers were received again, the Editors decided to accept or reject the work according to the fulfilment of the reported recommendations.• Contact person for queries: Dr. Victor Meana (meanavictor@uniovi.es)Secretary of the Scientific CommitteeDepartment of Construction and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of OviedoSpain

Preface

2021 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology [ICCSCT2021] has been held successfully on July 29-31, 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic around the world, and with the strict travelling rules in China, it is still difficult to take international travel for our attendees abroad. Therefore, ICCSCT2021 was held both in physical (Beijing, China) and online (Zoom).The organizing committee would like to appreciate all participants in this special time. The COVID-19 brought huge difficulty in academic communications. However, with the help of internet and communication technology, researchers from different countries and areas could get together and present their latest findings and ideas. This time, we are honored to have 50 participants, including 46 presenters, involved in the forum. The conference was divided into three parts: two keynote speeches in the first day, each with 45min, and 12 oral presentations followed in the first afternoon and the second day, each with 15min. Besides, 34 e-posters have been presented in the conference website. The session chairs and keynote speakers have worked together to selected the best oral presentation and poster presentation.This year, ICCSCT2021 has attracted about 200 submissions, and 80 of them are accepted to be included in this collection. The process of evaluation and peer-review has last for about 6 months, with around 80 TPC members and reviewers involved in. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all experts for their professional and detailed review comments, which have contributed to the high standard of this collection.Collected papers discuss mainly about the state-of-the art topics including Communication Technology, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, and Big Data, Robot and Automation, Data Processing, Computing and Analysis. The application field ranges from manufacturing industry to daily life.In the end, we hope this collection can enhance the understanding of computer science and communication technology and encourage more applications and creations. We appreciate the more convenience life brought by technology. And look forward to a more successful conference next year.Changbo ChengHubei Zhongke Institute of Geology and Environment TechnologyList of titles Organizer, General Chair, Co-chair, Publication Chair, Publication Co-chair, Program Chair, Technical Program Committee are available in this Pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind• Criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers:The reviewers check the papers by considering the topic and subtopic of the conference, research paper standard, novelty of the research, following the format of IOP template• Conference submission management system:Authors uploaded their papers via conference website.• Number of abstract submissions received (before concerence day):203 abstracts• Number of abstract are accepted and presented in the conference:203 tittles.• Number of tittles are presented only in the conference:38 tittles.• Number of full paper received (after concerence day):165 papers• Number of submissions sent for review:165 papers• Number of papers that will be reviewed for 1 reviewer:5-7 paper• Time given to the reviewer to review the paper:1 month• Number of submissions accepted:156 papers are accepted to be published• Number of paper rejection due to out of the scope:5 papers• Number of papers are withdrawn by authors because the authors want to publish the paper in other publishers:3 papers• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):(156/165) x 100 = 94.5 %• Total number of reviewers involved:18 reviewers• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system):All papers are plagiarism checked by Turnitin software, and maximal similarity is 20%Contact person for queries:Prof. Dr.-Ing. Mitra DjamalPhysics Department, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha No. 10 BandungPhysics Department, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Jl. Terusan Ryacudu, Way Hui, Lampung SelatanEmail: mitra.djamal@yahoo.co.id,icositer2020@itera.ac.id

Preface

2021 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science (AICS2021) has been held successfully on July 29-31, 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic around the world, and with the strict travelling rules in China, it is still difficult to take international travel for our attendees abroad. Therefore, AICS2021 was held both in physical (Beijing, China) and online (Zoom).About 80 attendees have participated in the conference. The conference was divided into three parts: five keynote speeches in the first day, each with 45min, and 16 oral presentations followed in the first afternoon and the second day, each with 15min. Besides, 58 e-posters have been presented in the conference website. The session chairs and keynote speakers have worked together to selected the best oral presentation and poster presentation.This year, AICS2021 has attracted more than 300 submissions, and 106 of them are accepted to be included in this collection. The process of evaluation and peer-review has last for about 6 months, with over 100 TPC members and reviewers involved in. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all experts for their professional and detailed review comments, which have contributed to the high standard of this collection.This collection includes six major parts: (1) Artificial Intelligence and Applications (2) Algorithms; (3) Image Processing; (4) Intelligent Systems; (5) Software and Hardware (6) Internet Technology and Applications, with most up-to-date findings and technologies being discussed. We believe participants of AICS2021 have gained knowledge as well as met new friends in the same field. And we hope this collection can benefit the readers in the same way.List of Organizer, General Chair, Co-Chair, Editor, Co-editor, Program Chair, Technical Program Committee are available in this pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Using the conference website and the email management system. • Number of submissions received: 68 • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 • Number of submissions accepted:47 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):69.12% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:30 reviewers distributed in different countries. • Any additional info on review process: All papers should be revised according to the reviewers’ comments (at least two reviewers) to revise 1-2 times. We design the review form to let the reviewers review papers and write their comments (According to Originality of the Topics, Technical Quality, Importance in Its Fields, Style and Overall Representation, Readily Understandable, Suitability for Journal, Adequate Illustrations or Drawings etc. to write the comments and make the final decisions, such as “Accepted as it is”, “Minor revision”, “Major revision”, “Decline submission [Reject] ”, then we collect two reviewers’ comments into the author response comments table to let the authors fill in the revisions and revise their papers according to the reviewers’ comments. Some papers will send to the third reviewer for confirming the papers for publication or rejection. The selected papers reviewed by at least two reviewers are sent for the publications after the recommendation of the chief editor. • Contact person for queries: Conference Chair : Chair Professor Gow-Yi Tzou, PhDAffiliation:Chung-Chou University of Science and Technologygowyitzou@gm.ccut.edu.tw or johnsontzou@gmail.com

Peer review declaration

II International Conference on Advances in Material Science and Technology (CAMSTech-2021), 29-31 July 2021, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s).• Conference submission management system: Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 20,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors.• Number of submissions received: 100• Number of submissions sent for review: 100• Number of submissions accepted: 33• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 33• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 25• Any additional info on review process: The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper.• Contact person for queries: Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990

Peer review declaration

V International Workshop on Innovations in Agro and Food Technologies (WIAFT-V-2021), 17-18 June 2021, Volgograd, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s). • Conference submission management system: Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 18,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors. • Number of submissions received: 430 • Number of submissions sent for review: 430 • Number of submissions accepted: 245 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.9 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 • Any additional info on review process: The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper. • Contact person for queries: Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990

Peer review declaration

V International Scientific Conference on Agribusiness, Environmental Engineering and Biotechnologies (AGRITECH-V – 2021), 16-19 June 2021, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s).• Conference submission management system:Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 17,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors.• Number of submissions received: 730• Number of submissions sent for review: 730• Number of submissions accepted: 383• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52.5• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 47• Any additional info on review process:The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper.• Contact person for queries:Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990