Conference Management Research Articles

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Double-blind. All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declare their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript. Conference submission management system: All the submissions are managed by email and the Conference Management Toolkit. All the submissions viaemail: ICAPEE@163.com. Zhihui Tan (zhibinyou@whut.edu.cn) was in charge of this work Number of submissions received: APEE 2020 received 453 manuscripts Number of submissions sent for review: About 420 submissions were sent for review. Number of submissions accepted: 126 submissions had been accepted by our reviewers. Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 27.8% Average number of reviews per paper: 2.02 Total number of reviewers involved: 71 Any additional info on review process: By submitting a paper to APEE 2020, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Conference Committee, who will give detailed comments and-if the submission gets accepted-the authors submit a revised version that takes into account this feedback. Contact person for queries: (please include name, affiliation and email address) Zhibin You, Wuhan University of Technology, zhibinyou@whut.edu.cn

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) A special, cleaned version of every manuscript was prepared by the conference team member for the peer review procedure with most of identity determining data being removed/censored. Cleaned manuscripts were sent to various potential peer reviewers for initial skimming that eventually would lead to their acceptance or decline for the peer review. In case of acceptance, the deadline was decided and the special form was issued for peer reviewer to fill his commentary on the manuscript. Every paper needed at least two positive reviews and more peer review queries were made in case of disputes over the quality of the work. At no point in the procedure the reviewers or the author knew the identities of any party involved.• Conference submission management system: Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit • Number of submissions received: 37 (out of 109 conference submissions) • Number of submissions sent for review: 23 for IOP Peer Review • Number of submissions accepted: 21 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56,76% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 43 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Mateusz Karczewski: mateusz.karczewski@agh.edu.pl

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: UMK conference management system (icost.umk.edu.my) • Number of submissions received: 119 • Number of submissions sent for review: 119 • Number of submissions accepted: 100 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 84.0 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 113 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Contact person for queries:Dr. Noor Janatun Naim Binti JemaliFaculty of Earth Science,Universiti Malaysia Kelantanjanatunnaim@umk.edu.my

Preface

The BulTrans-2020 International Scientific Conference on Aeronautics, Automotive, Railway Engineering and Technologies is the twelfth international conference organized by the Transport Faculty at the Technical University of Sofia. The conference is part of the Science Days of the Technical University of Sofia and was held in the town of Sozopol, at TU Recreation Base Lazur on September 10-13, 2020. The conference was partially held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.The conference program included a plenary session and 7 thematic sessions. The duration of the plenary lectures was 30 minutes and of the thematic oral presentations - 15 minutes, followed by questions and answers sessions. The presentations of the participants present on-site and those of the online participants were screened in the conference hall. The conference was held successfully with Zoom videoconferencing software. The authors shared the screen and all attendees could discuss their work via the online platform. The chairpersons of all sections were present on-site in the conference hall, while some of the participants were online, including 13 presenting authors.All accepted papers were subject to peer-reviewing by the scientific editorial board and invited reviewers. The papers were selected on the basis of their quality and their relevance to the conference topics. The review process, as well as all communication between participants and organizers was conducted through the web-based conference management system process.bultrans.org. I would like to thank the reviewers and the scientific editorial board members for their time and advice, and the authors for taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations and for improving the quality of the papers selected for presentation at the conference and for publication in this volume. I would also like to thank the conference committee, chairpersons, sponsors, and all other conference participants for their support of BulTrans-2020.List of Scientific editorial board, Reviewers are available in this pdf.

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review:Single-Blind Review• Conference submission management system:We use the Conference Management Tool services provided by www.conftool.net. The conference tool page of The 5th PlanoCosmo International Conference can be accessed on the website link https://www.conftool.net/planocosmo2020/• Number of submissions received:76• Number of submissions sent for review:39• Number of submissions accepted:36• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):47,37 %• Average number of reviews per paper:Each abstract was reviewed by two reviewers. In average, each full paper was sent to two potential reviewers. Although not every reviewer was able to provide feedback within the given time, there should at least be one review report available to decide the acceptance of the full paper (inclusion in the proceedings).• Total number of reviewers involved:There were 85 reviewers invited in the peer-review process, including the scientific committee as well as external reviewers from Institut Teknologi Bandung and other universities in Indonesia, and also scholars’ base in Australia, Malaysia, The Netherlands, United States of America, and India.• Any additional info on review process: The review was carried out in several layers:1. The first review was conducted to assess the quality of the abstract, which determines whether the participant was fit to continue submitting the full paper or not. The criteria for abstract review were: a). The themes proposed in the abstract must had conformity with the big theme of the conferences, “Infrastructure for all: Smart, Innovative, and Inclusive”; b). should consist a brief of: background, purpose and potential contributions, methodology, preliminary results, conclusion and keywords.2. After that, in the second review, as the participants had submitted their full papers, the editorial team conducted a preliminary check regarding plagiarisms (using the Turnitin software), potential conflict of interests and adherence to the standard formatting requirements.3. If the paper passed this preliminary check, the reviewers were then invited to assess the quality of the full paper in accordance with these criteria:a. Is the thesis argument introduced clearly and positioned in the current literature?b. Is the methodology sound?c. Does evidence provided in the paper support the core argument?d. Is the paper concluded by a solid synthesis?e. Is the English language clear and understandable?4. After the author sending back the revised paper from the second step above, then a final review was carried out by the editors to then check whether the improvements recommended by the reviewer had been accommodated or not by the author. If there were still things that have not been fixed, then the paper was returned to the author to be revised again.5. As to the point 3, in a small number of cases, major revisions were needed, and the revised paper was sent again to the reviewers before the editors decided the acceptance.• Contact person for queries: Dr. I Gusti Ayu Andani ayuandani@sappk.itb.ac.id Jl. Ganesha 10, Labtek IX A Sugijanto Soegijoko Building, 5th Floor, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Of the 213 articles received by the committee, there were 2 articles that did not include the full paper, so the committee rejected the article. Furthermore, 211 articles were submitted to the reviewer for a review process using the single-blind type (the reviewer knows the author of the article). The reviewers at the ICAISD-2020 seminar consist of experts in the fields of Applied Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Management who have at least 5 Scopus-Index qualifications in their respective fields.Reviewer gives a score of 3 to -1 (3 Strong accept, 2 Accept, 1 Weak accept, 0 Borderline paper, -1 Weak reject, -2 Reject, -3 Strong reject).Furthermore, based on the provisions of the seminar committee meeting, the articles received are those that have a score of 0 to 3 with the number of articles 148 which will then be camera ready by uploading the revised article on the icaisd.info. Meanwhile, articles with a score of-3 to -1 were rejected with a total of 63 articles. Conference submission management system: Conference Management System used is easychair☐ Number of submissions received: 213 ☐ Number of submissions sent for review: 211 Number of submissions accepted: Numbers of accepted articles are 148 however, 3 authors do not do the presentation of their articles.☐ Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69,48 Average number of reviews per paper: Each article is on average reviewed by 2 reviewers, if one reviewer accepts and one reviewer rejects, we will give it to the third reviewer to take into consideration whether the article is accepted or rejected. Total number of reviewers involved: Total numbers of reviewers involved are 22 persons Any additional info on review process: After the review process is complete, the accepted article will be informed to the author to be corrected / revised and re-uploaded the revised document and its presentation document via the http://icaisd.info/icaisd/login.aspx page to be presented again on 6-7 August 2020 via Zoom☐ Contact person for queries: Mr. Agus Priadi

Peer review declaration

2nd International Conference on Applied Physics, Information Technologies and Engineering (APITECH-II 2020), 20-21 November 2020, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS) have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.☐ Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected.We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 5 to 10 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards.The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s).☐ Conference submission management system: Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls.More than 12,000 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility.The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports:1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers;2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission;3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information;4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals;5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors;6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes;7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence;8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors.☐ Number of submissions received: 705☐ Number of submissions sent for review: 703☐ Number of submissions accepted: 413☐ Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 58.7☐ Average number of reviews per paper: 2.1☐ Total number of reviewers involved: 47☐ Any additional info on review process: The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc.The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper.☐ Contact person for queries: Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: krasnio@bk.ru. Tel + 7 913 538 6990

Peer review declaration

NEWTECH 2020 International Conference, September 09-11, 2020, Galati, Romania Online edition All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: The type of peer review was Single-blind. The review forms were sent to reviewers and their identities was hidden from authors. In the attached document you will find the documents which certified this action, including a list with the reviewers. In the document, the review forms are presented before being sent to authors.Each paper was sent to the two independent reviewers by the conference president. At least one more reviewer was used if the evaluation between the two reviewers was much different,.The review reports were received by the organizing committee and sent to the authors.The revised papers by the authors were retransmitted to the reviewers in order to receive the final answer.• Conference submission management system: The conference management system was done through the conference platform (www.newtech2020.ugal.ro). Each author, after registering could upload the paper. Initially, the abstract of the paper was uploaded. If the abstract concerning the conference topics was accepted, the paper was sent by email to the organizing committee.In the first step, the work was checked to avoid plagiarism. If the similarity percentage was adequate, following the analysis performed by the organizing committee, the revision process was started, according to those presented above. Only papers that were presented to the conference were accepted.If during the papers presentations were observations, the authors were obliged to resubmit the corrected paper.• Number of submissions received: Total papers received were 32 (for IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering) from which 2 were rejected by the reviewers. The documents regarding these rejects, were not included.• Number of submissions sent for review: 32 papers were sent to the reviewers.• Number of submissions accepted: 30 papers were accepted.• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100 = 30/32X100 = 93,75%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper.• Total number of reviewers involved: 42 reviewers from which 21 from abroad.• Contact person for queries: Viorel PAUNOIU, viorel.paunoiu@ugal.ro

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Double-blind (involving internal and external reviewers)• Conference submission management system: EDAS Conference and Journal Management System• Number of submissions received: 66 papers• Number of submissions sent for review: 61 papers• Number of submissions accepted: 59 papers• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 89.39%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers• Any additional info on review process: The organizer received draft papers and distributed the papers to reviewers through the EDAS system. Each paper was sent to two reviewers. The papers were reviewed based on the following aspects: Clarity, Suitability, Originality, Methodology Appropriateness, Clarity of finding, and Scientific.If reviewers accepted the papers, then the organizer sent the papers back to authors so the authors can address all comments from the reviewers.The authors sent the final manuscripts back to the organizer through the EDAS system. Later, the AISCE 2019 editors finalized the final manuscripts by proofreading and checking the format of manuscripts based on IOP Publishing guidelines.• Contact person for queries: Teuku Budi Aulia (aulia@unsyiah.ac.id)

Looking Beyond the Horizon: A Vision for Association for Vascular Access's Future

Looking Beyond the Horizon: A Vision for Association for Vascular Access's Future

Preface

We are very grateful that our 2nd Conference on Tropical Resources and Sustainable Sciences (CTReSS 2.0) held in Kelantan, Malaysia on 10th till 11th August 2020 was successfully organised. This conference was organised by Faculty of Earth Science, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK) with collaboration Research Management and Innovation Centre, UMK provided an international forum for experimental and theoretical researchers/stakeholders to exchange ideas pertaining to sustainable science and natural resource management.Aligning with a National Policy on Biodiversity 2016 and National Policy on the Environment 2002, “Protecting and Conserving the Environment for Sustainable Living” was a theme of this conference emphasising on sustainable development future enhancement and better living standards. The main goal of this conference was to explore and scrutinise the current issues of natural resource management from environmental, social and economic perspectives. It can be described as the needs to prepare the world for future generation to continue the responsibility to make the world a better place to live.Through this conference, ideas, initial outcome, research products and sustainable development policies were coined, and solutions to preserve our dying nature were recommended. Perhaps it can be further enhanced to be applied and implemented locally and globally. Thus, we have to ensure that we conduct the necessary steps towards sustainability of the world in whatever discipline and role that we have.We would like to extend our profound gratitude to the authors, reviewers participants, organisers, sponsors, supporting partners and the conference management team for their enthusiasm and synergistic efforts in ensuring the conference successfulness. We hope this conference was fruitful for everyone and we expect to meet again in the future.Chairman of CTReSS 2.0

CoCon: A Conference Management System with Formally Verified Document Confidentiality

We present a case study in formally verified security for realistic systems: the information flow security verification of the functional kernel of a web application, the CoCon conference management system. We use the Isabelle theorem prover to specify and verify fine-grained confidentiality properties, as well as complementary safety and “traceback” properties. The challenges posed by this development in terms of expressiveness have led to bounded-deducibility security, a novel security model and verification method generally applicable to systems describable as input/output automata.

Sustainability Transformation, the challenge is now!

Dear friends of Sinergie, This issue of the Journal contains the best papers presented at the Sinergie-SIMA 2019 conference Management and sustainability. Creating shared value in the digital era, which took place last June at Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy. The Conference had a large participation, with around 350 participants, 51 full papers and 101 extended abstracts presented, and offered a rich and profound perspective of investigation on a theme that is of crucial importance at all levels: for institutions, for businesses, for people's lives. The relevance and urgency of sustainability - environmental, social, and economic - in recent years have finally found increasing confirmation also in important political-institutional forums, translating into action plans, such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with its Sustainable Development Goals, and the European Green New Deal. ... to be continued

Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.□ Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Double-blind. By submitting a paper to FMIA 2020, the authors agreed to the review process and understood that papers would undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts were reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the conference committee, who took detailed comments and-if the submission was accepted-the authors would submit a revised version that took into account this feedback. All papers were reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declared their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers did not know each other’s identities, nor did the authors receive information about who had reviewed their manuscript. □ Conference submission management system: Conference Management Toolkit (sponsored by Microsoft Research) and Email □ Number of submissions received: 379 □ Number of submissions sent for review: 371 □ Number of submissions accepted: 92 □ Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 24.3 □ Average number of reviews per paper: 2 □ Total number of reviewers involved: 32 □ Any additional info on review process: Fluid mechanics is a very small division of physics. Therefore, there are fewer research institutions and researchers. Although it is a blind review, reviewers and authors often know each other. □ Contact person for queries: Jun Xiao

In Memoriam

In Memoriam

EFMI

EFMI members teamed up to work actively for visibility, cooperation and growth of the organization. New activities, as developing the first project building a platform to work with a medical professional European association, having a new Board position supporting young researchers – yEFMI, shifting to professional management of conferences, are several counterpoints in EFMI's current life. We continue to build on the agreed strategy and background in relation with visibility and activities around social media and web presence or publication in conferences. Participating in EU projects is of great importance for EFMI, national members and workgroups will continue the proactive developments in this area. The educational activities are a priority for EFMI and will continue with the same force. EFMI will increase and will be more focused in the future to develop better relations with editors of impact journals. For the cohesion of EFMI members we continuously look for cooperation at research level between national societies through work visits, workshops, invitations and presence during national societies’ events.

An automated conflict of interest based greedy approach for conference paper assignment system

Abstract Reviewer Assignment Problem (RAP) is a crucial problem for the conference due to time constraints and inadequate availability of expert reviewers. A fair evaluation of paper is key to an author's success, paper quality, conference reputation, and productive usage of funds. Recent studies reflect on the issue of reviewer bias in bids favoring authors belonging to the top institution and higher authority. Existing Conference Management Systems (CMS) are solely dependent upon self-declared Conflict of Interest (CoI) made by the authors, and reviewers. In literature, existing studies considers topic similarity, potential CoI, and reviewer's workload as trivial factors for ensuring review quality. Other factors include the diversity and authority of a reviewer. Past studies propose several theoretical optimization models. In this paper, we first individually model the factors using the best possible strategy in a constrained-based optimization framework. We tried to propose a completely novel framework that can be practically implemented to improve upon the performance of existing CMS. We map the RAP to an equilibrium multi-job assignment problem. Moreover, we propose a meta-heuristic greedy solution to solve it using weighted matrix factorization. We re-define an assignment quality metric required to validate such assignments. A real conference assignment data set collected from EasyChair is used for a comparative study. The TPMS is used as a baseline because it also uses similar factors, and due to its integration with widely used Microsoft CMS. The results show that the mean assignment quality of the proposed method is superior to other benchmark RAP systems.

NorMAS-ML: Supporting the Modeling of Normative Multi-agent Systems

Context: A normative multi-agent system (NMAS) is composed of agents that their behavior is regulated by norms. The modeling of those elements (agents and norms) together at design time can be a good way for a complete understanding of their structure and behavior. Multi-agent system modeling language (MAS-ML) supports the representation of NMAS entities, but the support for concepts related to norms is somewhat limited. MAS-ML is founded in taming agents and objects (TAO) framework and has a support tool called the MAS-ML tool. Goal: The present work aims to present a UML-based modeling language called normative multi-agent system (NorMAS-ML) able to model the MAS main entities along with the static normative elements. Method: We extend the TAO adding normative concepts and spread out those concepts in two syntaxes of MAS-ML. Either abstract, adding or updating metaclasses and stereotypes or concrete, defining new graphic elements for representing the elements defined in the abstract syntax. Besides, we evolve the MAS-ML tool, considering the extension of MAS-ML by the model-driven approach. Results: NorMAS-ML, the new version of MAS-ML, allows a complete view of NMAS entities and has a support tool called NorMAS-ML tool. Beyond the definition of NorMAS-ML and its tool, we generate a new static diagram called “norm diagram” supported by the NorMAS-ML tool. In order to illustrate the syntax of NorMAS-ML, the entities of a conference management system and its norms are modeled jointly. Conclusion: NorMAS-ML can help software designers (i) to understand the properties and behavior of NMAS entities and (ii) to provide a software modeling following the stakeholders’ need and less complex for the development phase.

Requirement Model of Conference Management System: A Mobile App for Creating and Managing Conference Paper

Technology have changed the way we work. This have increased the productivity in the workplace. The purpose of having conference paper s app is to aid researcher to improve the effectiveness and efficiency on management of conference paper.Without a proper management of these matters, people might suffer from theinconvenient by using desktop system to complete certain tasks and monitor them efficiently. However, based on investigating existing applications, a few shortcomings have been identified. Certain shortcoming leads us to develop a new mobile application to fix the identified shortcomings. Some others include complex navigation of user interfaces this cause a poor user experience for user. Hence, this project proposes a development of a mobile application that is called CPMA to serve as a better alternative of tool to allow users managing and monitoring any related conference paper matters in more efficient way.This app specifically targeted for researcher in higher learning institutions who are needed to proceed with conference paper. Software development methodology named prototyping will be adapted which consisted of phases such as planning, repeated phases (analysis, design, implementation and system prototype), implementation and final system. The essential significant of this project is to provide a platform for researcher to manage and monitor conference paper in a savvy manner. By the time of completing this project, users are expected to access this application without any costs and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of managing conference paper.to ensure the security is presented in a tabular form for each online marketplace.

Design and Implement of a General Zone Controller for Intelligent Building Platform System

There are several problems of traditional building monitoring and management system, such as separation and isolation of sub-systems, lack of linkage control, low compatibility, difficulties in extending, etc. A design of intelligent building platform system architecture, which is compatible with existing building systems, has been put forward after the research of intelligent building technology. Combined with the requirements of modern intelligent building, a general zone controller with powerful processing capabilities, rich peripheral interface, multiple communication protocol and communication protocol has been designed and impleted. The zone controller can support the connection and linkage of various sub-systems, devices and sensors in different zone of the intelligent building. An intelligent conference management system of intelligent building system has been realized based on the zone controller.