Peer review declaration

Abstract

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.□ Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Double-blind. By submitting a paper to FMIA 2020, the authors agreed to the review process and understood that papers would undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts were reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the conference committee, who took detailed comments and-if the submission was accepted-the authors would submit a revised version that took into account this feedback. All papers were reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors declared their names and affiliations in the manuscript for the reviewers to see, but reviewers did not know each other’s identities, nor did the authors receive information about who had reviewed their manuscript. □ Conference submission management system: Conference Management Toolkit (sponsored by Microsoft Research) and Email □ Number of submissions received: 379 □ Number of submissions sent for review: 371 □ Number of submissions accepted: 92 □ Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 24.3 □ Average number of reviews per paper: 2 □ Total number of reviewers involved: 32 □ Any additional info on review process: Fluid mechanics is a very small division of physics. Therefore, there are fewer research institutions and researchers. Although it is a blind review, reviewers and authors often know each other. □ Contact person for queries: Jun Xiao