Commissioning of the LIAC intraoperative electron radiotherapy accelerator relies heavily on the manufacturer's SWL-LIAC simulation software, which substantially reduces the number of difficult-to-set-up measurements needed. The aim of this study was to independently validate the accuracy of SWL-LIAC's calculated outputs, namely, percentage depth-doses (PDDs), off-axis dose profiles and relative output factors (ROFs), against experimental data. For all the available energies (6, 8, 10, 12 MeV), PDD measurements were made for all sizes of the flat-ended applicators (3–10 cm) and several beveled applicators. Profiles and ROFs were measured for the more frequently used applicators in clinical practice and the reference 10 cm diameter applicator. Meticulous measurements were made using a p-type electron diode in a water phantom, aided by inhouse custom-made positioning tools and confirmed using radiochromic film dosimetry. The measured and calculated scans were compared using multi-criteria gamma analysis. Eighty-five percent of the calculated ROFs showed a 2% or better agreement with the measurements. The average gamma passing rate for PDDs was 100% using a 2mm/1% (global dose difference) criterion. Repeated measurements showed that the measured in-plane profiles were somewhat tilted, which was confirmed by the manufacturer. The average gamma passing rate of all profiles was 95.5% (2mm/3%); Without considering in-plane profiles, this value was 97.6%. It can be concluded that the accuracy of the SWL-LIAC calculations may be deemed acceptable for most clinical applications. However, assuming isotropic off-axis profiles is unwarranted and measuring profiles in both directions for all energies at installation and acceptance testing is indicated.