Abstract
For years, breach‐of‐contract claims by student‐athletes against colleges and universities have been vigorously defended. Although claims in the past were often rejected by the courts based on a variety of legal theories, the tide appears to have turned in the last several years. Now more than ever, courts are recognizing the legal rights and corresponding entitlements that belong to student‐athletes. The House, Fontenot, and Johnson cases, and others like them, are paving a new path in this regard while simultaneously focusing national attention on topics ranging from name, image, and likeness rights and payments to the potential employment status of student‐athletes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
