Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the current situation of the school bullying behaviors of students in junior high schools in Tainan It also compares the differences among the varied personal, family, and school backgrounds, and explores the relationships between what influences school bullying and being-bullied behaviors and school bullying and being-bullied behaviors. Finally, it analyzes the anticipated facts that influence school bullying and being-bullied behaviors. The subjects in this research were the public and private junior high school students of seventh, eighth, and ninth grade in Tainan City, and the researcher compiled questionnaires -the investigation on the school bullying behaviors of students in junior high school in Tainan City. There were 641 questionnaires given and 639 effective questionnaires were collected. The data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics, the method of Independent t test, One-way ANOVA, Scheffe Posteriori comparison, Pearson Product-moment and multiple regression with SPSS. The findings were as follows: 1. The school bullying behaviors on students of junior high school in Tainan City still exist. 2. There are significant distinctions on the school bullying behaviors in the different personal backgrounds for the students of junior high school in Tainan City, including gender, interpersonal relationship, and academic achievement. 3. There are significant distinctions on the school bullying behaviors in the different family backgrounds for the students of junior high school in Tainan City, including family members, sibling numbers, the harmony of parents' marriage, and parents' discipline. 4. There are significant distinctions in the school bullying behaviors in the different school backgrounds for the students of junior high school in Tainan City, including homeroom teacher's discipline. 5. The whole school bullying behaviors, bullying behaviors and being bullied of students of junior high school in Tainan City are positively related to each aspect- privacy, language, body, and majority. 6. There is significant anticipation of the facts of influencing school bullying behaviors for school bullying behaviors. That means we can use the facts of junior school bullying behaviors to predict the behaviors of school bullying. The facts include interpersonal relationship, homeroom teacher's misinterpretation, gender, the harmony of parents' marriage, family members, and parents' discipline.

Highlights

  • Unharmonious > HarmoniousExtremely Unharmonious > Extremely HarmoniousExtremely Unharmonious > Unharmonious, Fair, Harmonious, Extremely Harmonious ExtremelyUnharmonious Fair> Extremely > Extremely HarmoniousParents' Educating MethodsLaissez faire>DemocraticLaissez-faire> DemocraticLaissez-faire> TyrannicParents' Socio economic Position

  • To respond to results and recount of questions to be answered, we deducted the primary conclusions for bullying behaviors of students in junior high schools in Southern Taiwan cities

  • The research results are illustrated as below: 1. We should face up to school bullying behaviors of students in junior high schools in Southern Taiwan cities According to the data obtained by this research, we analyzed the overall bullying behaviors of students in junior high schools in Southern Taiwan cities, and found the mean of overall bullying behaviors is 1.23, and the percentage is 13.45%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unharmonious > HarmoniousExtremely Unharmonious > Extremely HarmoniousExtremely Unharmonious > Unharmonious, Fair, Harmonious, Extremely Harmonious ExtremelyUnharmonious Fair> Extremely > Extremely HarmoniousParents' Educating MethodsLaissez faire>DemocraticLaissez-faire> DemocraticLaissez-faire> TyrannicParents' Socio economic Position. Unharmonious > Unharmonious, Fair, Harmonious, Extremely Harmonious Extremely. Homeroom teacher's feelings with homeroom teacher Students'. Educating identification methods with homeroom teacher's 9>1. Physical punishment identification with homeroom teacher's punishing students without. 7>1、2 giving a chance for them to explain identification with homeroom teacher's not 7>1、2、4、9 believing the 7>1、2、4、6、9. 7>1 students' telling the truth Note: ◎ signifies single factor variance analysis reaches significant difference, but after-test does not reach significant difference.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call