Abstract
This study examines the progress of Korea's four major rivers weir dismantlement project and points out that the argument for dismantling the Four Major Rivers Weirs overlooks the issue of ‘time’ that guarantees sustainability, based on an ecological ethics perspective. The purpose is to suggest ways to resolve long-term conflicts. In order to achieve this research purpose, we review the theory of individualistic environmental ethics as a critique of the deconstruction theory and a new logic of deconstruction. In addition, we looked at various controversies related to the dismantling of weirs and presented new solutions from the perspective of ecological ethics. In conclusion, the dismantling of the Four Major Rivers weirs needs to be carried out gradually, with time to spare and while ensuring sustainability, from the perspective of ecological ethics. To this end, a progressive alternative was presented by additionally reflecting the elements of recovery time and gradualness in the existing environmental impact assessment items.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.