Volumetric Arc Therapy Research Articles

Defining the potential for sexual structures-sparing for prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: A dosimetric study

PurposeThe purpose of the study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of sexual-sparing radiotherapy for prostate cancer, with magnetic resonance-only treatment planning. Material and methodsFifteen consecutive patients receiving prostate cancer radiotherapy were selected. A synthetic CT was generated with a deep learning method from each T2-weighted MRI performed at the time of treatment planning. For each patient, two plans were performed: standard treatment planning and sexual-structures sparing treatment planning. The treatment plan was designed to deliver a dose of 78Gy to the prostate and 50Gy to the seminal vesicles in 2Gy daily fractions, using volumetric arc therapy. Dose–volume histograms were computed to compare treatment plans. ResultsAll plans fulfilled dosimetric objectives and were equivalent regarding planning target volume coverage. The doses delivered to both rectum, bladder, and femoral heads were similar between plans (P=0.20). Sexual-sparing plans enabled to decrease all dosimetric parameters on sexual organs-at-risk. The mean penile bulb dose in sexual-sparing plans was significantly reduced (21.1Gy±20.7 versus 13.4Gy±14.0, P<0.01), however with large variability observed between individuals. The mean dose delivered to the corpora cavernosa was also significantly reduced within sexual-sparing plans (13.1Gy±16.7 versus 8.6Gy±10.4, P<0.01). A significant reduction was also observed in the highest doses delivered to internal pudendal arteries (D10%: 48.4Gy±8.3 versus 33.1Gy±4.6, P<0.05; D5%: 52.0Gy±8.7 versus 36.8Gy±5.5, P<0.05). ConclusionSparing of sexual structures appears feasible, without compromising neither planning target volume coverage nor doses delivered to non-sexual organs at risk. The clinical significance of this dose-reduction requires prospective evaluation.

Response of various histological types of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant multimodality therapy.

To determine the response of various histological types of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant multimodality therapy. The non-randomised, quasi-experimental retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised data of patients treated between January 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. The data retrieved related to histologically proven and locally advanced rectal cancer patients aged 18-70 years receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Radiotherapy dose was 45 gray to pelvis with a boost to gross tumour of 5.4 gray in 3 fractions by using volumetric arc therapy concurrently with capecitabine 625mg/m² daily. A magnetic resonance imaging scan of pelvis with contrast was done at 5-10 weeks before surgery. Histological response to neoadjuvant treatment of various histological types was evaluated using the Rectal Cancer Regression Grade. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. Of the 182 patients evaluated, 108(59.34%) were included; 64(59.3%) males and 44(40.7%) females. The overall mean age was 45.4±5.2 years. Regression status was grade 1 in 24(22%) patients, grade 2 in 43(40%) and grade 3 in 41(38%) (p=0.074). There were 12(11.11%) patients with signet ring cell and 10(83.3%) showed pathological tumour regression. There were 17(15.74%) patients with mucinous variant, and 12(70.5%) had tumour regression. There were 79(73.15%) patients with adenocarcinoma, and 59(74.6%) of them showed tumour regression. . There was less tumour regression in mucinous and signet ring cell variants of adenocarcinoma. Modification and intensification of neoadjuvant therapy may be required in such histologies.

Evaluation of Dosimetric and Radiobiological Parameters for Different TPS Dose Calculation Algorithms and Plans for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

Lung cancer presents a major public health concern in our country and around the globe. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities for lung cancer management for several years. This study aims to evaluate differences in the dosimetric and radiobiological parameters and in the dose distributions of Planning Target Volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) in patients with lung tumors using different Treatment Planning System (TPS) algorithms and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. This study was accomplished in a group of 19 patients with lung tumors who were treated in our clinic. In the treatment planning of the patients; Elekta-Monaco with Monte Carlo (XVMC), Pencil Beam algorithm; Varian-Eclipse with Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA), Acuros XB (AXB)algorithms and Tomo-plan Treatment Planning System with Convolution Superposition algorithm of Tomotherapy device were used. In these treatment planning systems, plans were done by 6 MV photon energy using Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques. The prescribed dose to the PTV was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics v.29.0.2.0 programme. Statistically, significant differences were found in Dmean, Dmax, D2 and D98 values for PTV between the algorithms, while small differences were found in Dmax values of the contralateral lung, total lung and esophagus in critical organs. It is concluded that the difference between algorithms for PTV increases especially as the volume of the target tumor decreases. TPS with C/S algorithm gave closer results with XVMC. Algorithms were found to have an impact on radiobiological parameters.

Safety and Feasibility of Hippocampal Sparing Cranial Radiation in Pediatric and Adolescent Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients: A Prospective Study.

Introduction Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) constitutes a significant portion of pediatric malignancies, with central nervous system (CNS) relapse posing a considerable threat to patient outcomes. While cranial radiation therapy (CRT)has been utilized to mitigate CNS relapse, it is associated with neurocognitive (NC) side effects. This study explores the feasibility and safety of using volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) with hippocampal sparing (HS) during cranial radiation therapy for ALL patients, aiming to reduce these side effects. Methodology This prospective observational study included pediatric and young adult patients with ALL who werein remission. HS was achieved using VMAT, and NC assessments were performed at baseline, six months, one year, and, to a limited extent, four years posttreatment. Results VMAT enabled precise hippocampal-sparing CRT with minimal dose to the hippocampus. Dosimetric analysis revealed that patients receiving 18 Gy had mean doses to planning target volume (PTV) and bilateral hippocampus of 18.9 and 9 Gy, respectively. Those receiving 12 Gy had corresponding doses of 13.3 and 7 Gy, respectively. Conformity and homogeneity indices were 0.9 and 0.1, and no brain relapses were observed among the patients in this study. NC assessments demonstrated no decline in intelligence quotient (IQ) scores over time, while only a subset of patients could be assessed at the four-year mark; telephone interviews suggested no significant cognitive decline. Conclusions This study highlights the potential of VMAT with HS as a promising approach to CRT for ALL patients in reducing the risk of NC side effects. The absence of brain relapses and preservation of NC function are encouraging findings, though larger studies are necessary to establish conclusive evidence.

Prostate intra-fraction motion recorded by transperineal ultrasound.

Infra-fraction motion of the prostate was recorded during 3.423 fractions of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in 191 patients, 14 of which were treated by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and 177 of which were treated by volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). The prostate was imaged by three-dimensional and time-resolved transperineal ultrasound (4D-US) of type Clarity by Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden. The prostate volume was registered and the prostate position (center of volume) was recorded at a frequency of 2.0 samples per second. This raw data set contains a total of 1.985.392 prostate and patient couch positions over a time span of 272 hours, 52 minutes and 34 seconds of life radiotherapy as exported by the instrument software. This data set has been used for the validation of models of prostate intra-fraction motion and for the estimation of the dosimetric impact of actual intra-fraction motion on treatment quality and side effects. We hope that this data set may be reused by other groups for similar purposes.

1196: Dosimetric validation of Total Marrow with Lymphoid Irradiation with Volumetric Arc Therapy

1196: Dosimetric validation of Total Marrow with Lymphoid Irradiation with Volumetric Arc Therapy

Gamma Knife Versus Volumetric Arc Modulated Therapy in a Linear Accelerator in Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastasis: Literature Review

This literature review introduces the treatment results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) administered by linear accelerators for patients diagnosed with multiple brain metastases. The present study aimed to compare Gamma Knife radiosurgery with Volumetric Arc Modulated Therapy (VMAT) administered using a linear accelerator for brain metastases and their respective safety profiles and therapeutic results. The review assesses research on treatment precision, local control rates, survival outcomes, radiation necrosis incidence, and post-treatment quality of life. It evaluates technical progress, treatment plans, and physiological effects on brain tissue. Both modalities have the potential for managing brain metastases, with GKRS being beneficial for well-defined lesions and VMAT being a flexible and efficient option for larger or irregular-shaped metastases. The study highlights the unique benefits of each therapy for different types of brain metastases. GKRS and VMAT are effective treatments for brain metastases, using concentrated radiation for localised lesions and advanced imaging techniques for intricate or expanded regions. GKRS offers precise interventions with minimal invasiveness, suitable for patients with lower metastatic burdens or suboptimal surgical tolerance. Both therapies show similar effectiveness in local control and survival but may be better suited for specific patient needs and lesion characteristics

Could a low-dose definitive radiation therapy be the optimal treatment for choroidal hemangioma?

PurposeTo determine the efficacy of low-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of symptomatic choroidal hemangioma (CH). Materials and methodsFifty-three consecutive patients with CH were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent IMRT/VMAT as a unique treatment. Resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF), improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and reduction in tumor thickness were compared before and after radiotherapy. ResultsAfter definitive radiotherapy, 100 % of SRF and 76.7 % of exudative retinal detachment were resolved. 56.6 % of BCVA improvement in more than two lines was observed. The mean best-corrected visual acuity was 20/280 (range, 20/1200–20/40) at diagnosis and 20/100 (range, 20/1200–20/20) after treatment. The mean tumor thickness decreased significantly from 3.8 mm initially to 1.2 mm after treatment (p < 0.01). 66.0 % of patients were delivered with 21.6 Gy (range, 21.6–42 Gy), 84.9 % of fractional dose was 1.8 Gy (range, 1.8–2 Gy). No radiation-induced keratitis, retinopathy, or optic neuropathy were observed. Initial vision (p = 0.042), duration time of vision (p = 0.004), and tumor thickness (p = 0.049) were prognostic factors for vision recovery. ConclusionLow-dose IMRT/VMAT could effectively induce involution of the CH, with reduction of subretinal fluid and relief of damage to the neurosensory retina, which is an effective treatment mode for CH.

AAPM WGVRTO report 390: A survey of veterinary radiation oncology equipment and infrastructure in 2022.

Since 2010, there has been little published data on the state of equipment and infrastructure in veterinary radiation oncology clinical practice. These data are important not only to identify the status and use of technology within the veterinary radiation oncology community but also to help identify the extent of medical physics support. The purpose of our study is to report findings from a survey of veterinary radiation oncologists in the USA, Canada, and select centers outside of North America in 2022. A 40-question survey covering topics such as type of radiotherapy equipment, techniques offered, treatment planning systems and dose calculation algorithms, special techniques, board-certified radiation oncologists and residents, and extent of medical physics support was distributed through an online survey tool. Results from 40 veterinary radiation oncology institutions, with equipment explicitly used for veterinary care, suggest that the current state of practice is not dissimilar to what currently exists in human radiation oncology facilities; techniques and technologies commonly employed include flattening filter-free mode megavoltage beams, volumetric arc therapy, daily cone-beam computed tomography, image-guided radiation therapy, and sophisticated dose calculation algorithms. These findings suggest the need for modern radiation oncology acceptance testing, commissioning, and quality assurance programs within the veterinary community. The increase in veterinary radiation oncology residency positions and increasing sophistication of equipment suggests that increased levels of standardized medical physics support would benefit the veterinary radiation oncology community.

Robustness analysis of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans for head and neck cancer

Background and purposeDynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) has been shown to improve healthy tissue sparing compared to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). This study aimed to assess and compare the robustness of DTRT and VMAT treatment-plans for head and neck (H&N) cancer to patient-setup (PS) and machine-positioning uncertainties. Materials and methodsThe robustness of DTRT and VMAT plans previously created for 46 H&N cases, prescribed 50–70 Gy to 95 % of the planning-target-volume, was assessed. For this purpose, dose distributions were recalculated using Monte Carlo, including uncertainties in PS (translation and rotation) and machine-positioning (gantry-, table-, collimator-rotation and multi-leaf collimator (MLC)). Plan robustness was evaluated by the uncertainties’ impact on normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for xerostomia and dysphagia and on dose-volume endpoints. Differences between DTRT and VMAT plan robustness were compared using Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test (α = 5 %). ResultsAverage NTCP for moderate-to-severe xerostomia and grade ≥ II dysphagia was lower for DTRT than VMAT in the nominal scenario (0.5 %, p = 0.01; 2.1 %, p < 0.01) and for all investigated uncertainties, except MLC positioning, where the difference was not significant. Average differences compared to the nominal scenario were ≤ 3.5 Gy for rotational PS (≤ 3°) and machine-positioning (≤ 2°) uncertainties, <7 Gy for translational PS uncertainties (≤ 5 mm) and < 20 Gy for MLC-positioning uncertainties (≤ 5 mm). ConclusionsDTRT and VMAT plan robustness to the investigated uncertainties depended on uncertainty direction and location of the structure-of-interest to the target. NTCP remained on average lower for DTRT than VMAT even when considering uncertainties.

Does Breast Surgery Type Alter Incidental Axillary Irradiation? A Dosimetric Analysis of the "Sentinel Envahi et Randomisation du Curage" SERC Trial.

An incidental axillary dose of adjuvant radiotherapy using tangential beams is usually given after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The goal of this sub-study was to evaluate this incidental dose in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) according to two different radiotherapy techniques. Patients participating in a randomized SERC trial who received PMRT in a single center were included. We collected the incidental axillary dose delivered to the Berg level 1 using different dosimetric parameters and compared two techniques using Student's t-test: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). We analyzed radiotherapy plans from 52 patients who received PMRT from 2012 to 2021. The mean dose delivered to the Berg level 1 was 37.2 Gy. It was significantly higher with VMAT than with 3D-CRT-43.6 Gy (SD = 3.1 Gy) versus 34.8 Gy (SD = 8.6 Gy) p < 0.001. Eighty-four percent of the Berg level 1 was covered by 40 Gy isodose in the VMAT group versus 55.5% in the 3D-CRT group p < 0.001. On the Berg level 1, PMRT gives a dose at least equivalent to the one given by post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy, making it possible to limit completion axillary lymph node dissections in select pN1a patients treated with a mastectomy. Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT tend to increase this incidental dose.

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY (IMRT) AND VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC THERAPY (VMAT) IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

This study aimed to conduct a thorough dosimetric comparison between two advanced radiotherapy techniques, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), to ascertain the superior modality in terms of dose distribution and organ-at-risk sparing for rectal cancer patients. Thirty-three patients with ECOG performance status 1, aged between 18 to 60 years, diagnosed with Stage II to III rectal cancer, were included in this prospective study. Each patient underwent treatment planning with IMRT and VMAT techniques using Varian system simulation computed tomography scans. The dosimetric analysis encompassed the evaluation of target volume dose homogeneity, conformity, and doses to at-risk organs. The dosimetric comparison was conducted utilizing seven-field IMRT and dual arc VMAT plans. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and SPSS 20 software. Treatment plan constraints adhered to the RTOG 9406 guidelines, ensuring adequate planning target volume (PTV) coverage, homogeneity index, conformity index, and dose limits for organs at risk, including small bowel V20 (&lt;200cc), bladder V45 (&lt;21Gy), and femoral head V50 (≤30 Gy). Volumetric arc therapy plans demonstrated superior dose homogeneity to fixed-field intensity-modulated plans (p-value = 0.04), particularly in femoral head dose-limiting toxicity (p-value = 0.00). However, intensity-modulated therapy exhibited equivalent or superior performance in other evaluated parameters. Our findings suggest that while VMAT offers advantages in PTV coverage homogeneity and femoral head dose-limiting toxicity, IMRT remains competitive and potentially preferable in certain dosimetric aspects. The choice between IMRT and VMAT should be carefully considered based on individual patient characteristics and treatment goals. This comprehensive dosimetric comparison contributes valuable insights into optimizing radiotherapy planning for rectal cancer patients, potentially guiding clinical decision-making and improving treatment outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of definitive radiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in a regional Australian cancer centre.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care in the curative intent treatment of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus. Volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) is a highly conformal radiation therapy technique that has been implemented to reduce toxicity for these patients. However, there are few reports evaluating the long-term outcomes of VMAT. Thus, we evaluated the survival and toxicity outcomes of anal cancer patients treated in our regional cancer centre undergoing curative intent chemoradiotherapy using VMAT and following the Australian EviQ guidelines. All consecutive patients treated with the VMAT technique for curative-intent definitive chemoradiotherapy for anal SCC at our institution from 2013 until 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for survival and toxicity outcomes. Kaplan-Meier estimates of locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, anal cancer-specific survival and overall survival were obtained. In total, 44 patients were analysed. The median follow-up was 48.9 months (Range 7.8-107). 97.7% of patients completed the prescribed radiation therapy and 88.6% chemotherapy. Five patients (11.4%) recurred. Four (9.1%) had isolated local failures, and one (2.3%) had an isolated distant failure. There were no regional nodal failures. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, anal cancer-specific survival and overall survival were 90.3%, 97.7%, 88.1%, 97.1% and 87% at 3 years, and 90.3%, 97.7%, 88.1%, 93.0% and 72.3% at 5 years, respectively. Acute grade 3 genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI) and skin toxicities occurred in 2.2%, 6.8% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. There were no acute grade 4 toxicities. Late grade 2 GU and GI toxicities occurred in 6.8% and 11.3% of patients, respectively. There were no late grade 3 or 4 toxicities or treatment-related deaths. The 5 -year colostomy-free survival rate was 86.4%. Outcomes for anal SCC after definitive chemoradiotherapy using VMAT in our regional cancer centre results in low rates of grade 3/4 toxicity, high rates of organ preservation and excellent survival outcomes.

Dosimetric Comparison of CPAP and DIBH for Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

PurposeDespite the increasing interest in using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in radiotherapy (RT), direct comparisons with the more widely employed deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) have been limited. This planning study aimed to offer comprehensive geometric and dosimetric evidence by comparing CPAP and DIBH-based RT plans. Materials and MethodsA retrospective dataset of 35 left-sided breast cancer patients with planning CT (pCT) scans under three breathing conditions (free breathing, CPAP with 10 cmH2O pressure, and DIBH) was collected. Volumetric arc therapy plans aimed for 95% dose coverage to 95% of the planning target volume with a maximum dose below 107%. A comparative dosimetric analysis among the three plans was conducted. Additionally, geometric differences were assessed by calculating the minimum distance between the heart and the clinical target volume (CTV) in each pCT. ResultsCPAP and DIBH plans demonstrated comparable mean heart doses (1.05 Gy), which were significantly lower than the FB plan (1.34 Gy). The maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery was smallest in the CPAP plan (4.44 Gy), followed by DIBH (4.73 Gy) and FB (7.33 Gy). Other organ-at-risk doses for CPAP and DIBH were similar, with mean contralateral breast doses of 2.27 and 2.21 Gy, mean ipsilateral lung doses of 4.09 and 4.08 Gy, V20 at 6.11 and 6.31%, and mean contralateral lung doses of 0.94 and 0.92 Gy, respectively. No significant difference was found in the minimum heart-to-CTV distance between CPAP and DIBH. DIBH exhibited the greatest lung volume (3908 cc), followed by CPAP (3509 cc), and FB (2703 cc). ConclusionThe comparison between CPAP and DIBH shows their similarity in both geometric and dosimetric aspects, providing strong evidence for CPAP's effectiveness and feasibility in RT. This suggests its potential as an alternative to DIBH for left-sided breast cancer patients.

Acute Toxicity of Total Body Irradiation Using Volumetric Arc Therapy With a Focus on the Effect of Lung Dose Rate

Purpose/ObjectivesTo report adverse effects of high dose TBI delivered using a VMAT technique and to assess pulmonary toxicity at dose rates of 40 and 100 monitor units per minute (MU/min). Materials/MethodsThis retrospective study included patients >18 years old who received ≥8 Gy TBI using a VMAT technique. The TBI dose was prescribed to a planning target volume (PTV) consisting of a 0.5cm retraction of the body with the lungs subtracted. The objective function specified PTV coverage goals of D100%≥90% and Dmax<130%. A lung dose control structure consisting of a 1 cm retraction of the lung volume was limited to Dmean<75%. Treatments were initially delivered with a dose rate of 40 MU/min for the thoracic isocenters and 100 MU/min for the other isocenters. Beginning in January 2021, a dose rate of 100 MU/min was used for all isocenters. All treatments were administered in 2 Gy fractions delivered twice-daily. Acute toxicity was assessed for 30 days following TBI. ResultsA total of 29 patients were included in this analysis who received TBI between January 2019 and October 2021. Prescription dose ranged from 8 – 12 Gy. Mean lung dose was 7.9 Gy (SD: 1.4 Gy) for patients treated at 40 MU/min and for patients treated at 100 MU/min 7.1 Gy (SD: 1.3 Gy). Mucositis was the most common grade 3 toxicity and occurred in 10 (34%) patients. Only 1 instance of pneumonitis was observed and occurred in a patient who received a mean lung dose of 10.1 Gy delivered at 40 MU/min. ConclusionsIn this cohort of patients who received high dose TBI using a VMAT technique, the composite rate of acute toxicity was not unexpectedly high. We did not observe an increase in lung toxicity after increasing the dose rate of the thoracic isocenters from 40 MU/min to 100 MU/min.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy and flattening filter-free beams: dosimetric considerations.

The present study comparatively evaluates the impact of energy-matched flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams with different energy levels on the physical-dosimetric quality of lung and liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans. For this purpose, 54different lung and liver lesions from 44patients who had already received SBRT combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included in this retrospective planning study. Planning computed tomography scans already available were used for the renewed planning with 6MV, 6MV-FFF, 10MV, and 10MV-FFF under constant planning objectives. The treatment delivery data, dosimetric distributions, and dose-volume histograms as well as parameters such as the conformity index and gradient indices were the basis for the evaluation and comparison of treatment plans. Asignificant reduction of beam-on time (BOT) was achieved due to the high dose rates of FFF beams. In addition, we showed that for FFF beams compared to flattened beams of the same energy level, smaller planning target volumes (PTV) require fewer monitor units (MU) than larger PTVs. An equal to slightly superior target volume coverage and sparing of healthy tissue as well as organs at risk in both lung and liver lesions were found. Significant differences were seen mainly in the medium to lower dose range. We found that FFF beams together with VMAT represent an excellent combination for SBRT of lung or liver lesions with shortest BOT for 10MV-FFF but significant dose savings for 6MV-FFF in lung lesions.

A retrospective bilateral breast proton pencil beam scanning and photon volumetric arc therapy planning comparison

A retrospective bilateral breast proton pencil beam scanning and photon volumetric arc therapy planning comparison

Dosimetric evaluation of VMAT automated breast treatment plans: Towards the establishment of an institutional plan acceptability criteria

Abstract Introduction: To evaluate the clinical suitability of the current facility-based treatment plan protocol in establishing acceptability criteria. Material and methods: Automated Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) treatment plans were retrospectively evaluated for intact breast and chest-wall cancer patients from January 2021 to January 2023. Results: A total of 94 patients were planned and treated using automated contouring and VMAT planning technique. The number of patients planned and treated for intact breast and chest-wall were 41 (43.6%) and 53 (56.4%), respectively. The mean intact breast volumes for optimization (Brst_opt) receiving 95% and 105% of the prescribed doses were 92.80% ± 1.11 and 1.54% ± 1.02, respectively. Their corresponding mean chest-wall volumes for optimization (Chst_opt) were 90.65% ± 3.19 and 2.28% ± 2.99, respectively. For left-sided cases, the mean heart dose received was 4.61 Gy ± 1.76 and 5.18 Gy ± 1.55 for intact breast plans and that for chest-wall plans, respectively. The mean ipsilateral lung volume receiving 20 Gy of the prescribed dose was 12.22% ± 3.86 and 13.19% ± 3.74 for intact breast plans and chest-wall plans, respectively. For the Brst_opt and Chst_opt dose metrics were calculated; the mean homogeneity index (HI) was 0.14 ± 0.03 and 0.15 ± 0.04, mean uniformity index (UI) was 1.09 ± 0.03 and 1.11 ± 0.03, and mean conformity index (CI) were 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.91 ± 0.04, respectively. Conclusions: The dosimetric evaluation shows a good dose distribution in the target volumes with minimal doses to the organs at risk (OAR). Assessment of the current data affirms the clinical usefulness of the facility-adopted protocol in achieving quality treatment plans for intact breast and chest-wall irradiations. The establishment of plan acceptability criteria will help achieve improved overall treatment outcomes.

The Impact of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) Implementation on the Hybrid Technique in Left-Sided Whole Breast Irradiation: A Dosimetric Characteristic Study of 3D-CRT Hybrid VMAT in DIBH and Free Breathing Conditions, and VMAT in Free Breathing Conditions.

To investigate the impact of DIBH for heart sparing effect on left sided breast postoperative whole breast irradiation by comparing the dosimetric characteristics of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT and pure VMAT treatment planning under DIBH condition. The primary CT data sets from previously treated left sided early breast cancer were used for pure volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique re-planning for the dosimetric characteristics comparison. A treatment plan of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique was re-planned on the free breath (FB) condition for the investigation of the dosimetric characteristics comparison on DIBH condition. The prescribed dose for all the treatment plans was 42.5Gy in 16 fractions. All plans were optimized to cover 100% of the PTV by 95% of prescribed dose. The dosimetric differences among the 3 treatment plans for the 20 patients were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with p value<0.05 considered statistically significant. 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique yielded the best results on the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). By comparing this 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique using FB and DIBH technique, the mean heart dose (MHD) was reduced from 5.38Gy to 1.65Gy, respectively (p =0.001) and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)0.03cc dose was reduced from 27.87Gy to 9.41Gy, respectively (p =0.001). 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique significantly reduced the V5, V20 and D mean of the ipsilateral lung and D mean of the contralateral lung. The D5 of right breast was significantly reduced by 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT compared with VMAT using DIBH technique. The incorporation of DIBH into 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique provides the best benefits for the heart and the OAR with respect to the radiation dose-sparing effect without compromising the target conformity and homogeneity in the treatment planning.

Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Offered Advantageous Dosimetry Compared to Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) or Helical Tomotherapy (HT) in Patients with Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

Radiotherapy of synchronous bilateral breast cancer poses some technical challenges with regards to dose coverage and sparing of organs at risk (OAR). In this study, we aimed to evaluate dosimetric characteristics of 3 different techniques, IMPT vs photon (VMAT and HT). We hypothesized that IMPT would result in lower doses to organs at risk, as compared to the other 2 techniques. A total of 10 patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer who were treated with VMAT at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical target volume (CTV) included chest wall and regional nodes (supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary chain) and prescription dose was 40.05 Gy in 15 daily fractions. HT and IMPT plans were generated for each patient. Dose-volume statistics, including planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to OAR: lungs, heart, thyroid, spinal cord, brachial plexus and esophagus, were compared between modalities using a paired T-test. Mean age of patients was 61 years (43-84). Majority of the patients (80%) were ER+ PR+ and HER2-. 40% of patients underwent breast reconstruction following surgery. All 3 techniques provided adequate target volume distribution and OAR sparing. Compared to VMAT and HT plans, IMPT had better heart and lung sparing effects, resulting in lower mean and V25 Gy heart dose; mean, V20 Gy and V5 Gy lung dose (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in VMAT and HT plans for mean heart and lung dose. VMAT plans showed significantly lower V25 Gy heart dose on average (p = 0.04). V5 Gy lung dose was slightly lower in HT compared to VMAT plans, approaching statistical significance (p = 0.08). PTV coverage was adequate for all 3 techniques. All techniques fulfilled cord, esophagus, thyroid and brachial plexus constraints. IMPT plans showed significantly better OAR sparing compared to photon techniques. All 3 techniques met OAR constraints, and resulted in adequate target volume coverage. As IMPT is significantly more costly than VMAT or HT techniques, appropriate patient selection is important to deliver treatment in the most resource-effective manner for patients who would derive the most benefit, for example those with young age or existing heart or lung comorbidities.