Reported here are the results and their analysis from our detailed investigations of the effects of Cu doping () on the electronic structure and magnetic properties of the spinel O4. A detailed comparison is given for the and cases for both the bulk-like samples and nanoparticles. The electronic structure determined from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Rietveld analysis of x-ray diffraction patterns shows the structure to be: ()A]B i.e. substitutes for on the octahedral B-sites. For the bulk samples, the ferrimagnetic K for is lowered to K for the sample, this decrease being due to the effect of Cu doping. For the nanosize () sample, the lower K ( K) is observed using analysis, this lowering being due to finite size effects. For , fits of dc paramagnetic susceptibility data of versus T in nanosize samples to the Néel expression are used to determine the exchange interactions between the A and B sites with exchange constants: K (4.1 K), K (16.3 K) and K (13.8 K) for . The temperature dependence of ac susceptibilities and at different frequencies shows that in bulk samples of and , the transition at TC is the normal second order transition. But for the nanosize and 0.2 samples, analysis of the ac susceptibilities shows that the ferrimagnetic transition at TC is followed by a re-entrant spin-glass transition at lower temperatures K (138 K) for (). Analysis of the ac susceptibilities, and , versus T data is done in terms of two scaling laws: (i) Vogel–Fulcher law ; and (ii) power law of critical slowing-down . These fits confirm the existence of glassy behavior below TSG with the parameters (8.91), (9.6 × 10) and K (∼138 K) for the samples (0.2), with similar results obtained for other samples. The linear behavior of the peak maximum in versus (AT-line) further supports the existence of glassy states in nanosize samples. For , the temperature and composition dependence of the hysteresis loop parameters are investigated; all the samples with x ⩾ 0.1 have the coercivity HC and remanence . Since the results reported here in these nanostructures are significantly different from those in bulk , further investigations of their magnetic structures using neutron diffraction are warranted.
Read full abstract