Main textThis supplementary comparison was about the calibration of platinum resistance thermometers in the range of -70 °C to 250 °C. Four laboratories participated in the comparison: Emirates Metrology Institute (EMI) from United Arab Emirates, SASO-NMCC from Saudi Arabia, QGOSM from Qatar and Tubitak UME from Türkiye. These Institutes are full or associated (Tubitak UME) members of the GULFMET Regional Metrology Organization.The pilot institute was Emirates Metrology Institute, who also provided the two transfer platinum resistance thermometers and monitor their stability during the comparison.The measurements of the comparison were performed between April 2019 and February 2021 and the circulation of the instruments was without problems, except for a delay of four months between the laboratories QGOSM and EMI due to the Coronavirus pandemic.The weighted mean of the measurements from all laboratories was used to produce the W ratios and R 0.01 reference values of the thermometers and no laboratory was excluded from this weighted mean. Note that this comparison is an RMO supplementary comparison, so the weighted mean values generated are used only as a baseline for reporting the results, and they have no particular meaning of reference values in the sense of the key comparisons.The results show a satisfactory agreement between the participating laboratories (|En| <1), except for two set-points: -35 °C and 100 °C, for one of the two transfer thermometers, for one of the laboratories. Combined expanded uncertainties for R 0.01 were equivalent to about 0.004 °C for the laboratories using water triple point cells as a reference, and 0.010 °C for QGOSM laboratory using ice point as reference. For the other measurement points, R values, were having equivalent combined expanded uncertainties ranging from 0.0060 °C to 0.010 °C for UME, 0.008 °C to 0.016 °C for EMI, 0.012 °C to 0.024 °C for SASO-NMCC and 0.014 °C to 0.054 °C for QGOSM. The mentioned uncertainties refer to the most stable of the transfer thermometers used in the comparison.To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCT, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
Read full abstract