Introduction: This study compares the laws governing online lending, or peer-to-peer lending, in the UK and Indonesia, two nations with distinct fintech market features. This paper examines the legal framework that oversees the online lending sector in both nations using a normative juridical and comparative approach, with a particular emphasis on consumer protection, risk management, and regulatory supervision. Objective: According to the study's findings, Indonesia's fintech industry is governed by the Financial Services Authority, but the UK has more developed laws with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as the only body in charge. in contrast to Indonesia, the UK has more stringent licensing procedures and higher minimum capital requirements. Theoretical Framework: According to the study's findings, Indonesia's fintech industry is governed by the Financial Services Authority, but the UK has more developed laws with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as the only body in charge. in contrast to Indonesia, the UK has more stringent licensing procedures and higher minimum capital requirements. Method: This research uses a case approach to analyze existing problems. There are differences in legal regulations that cause problems. implementation of sanctions and supervision that cannot be implemented properly. These indications will be analyzed to find solutions to existing problems. Results and Discussion: While Indonesia has just recently started to create comparable safeguards for investors, the UK mandates that online lending platforms have explicit backup plans and reserves to protect consumers. Research Implications: There are still regulatory loopholes that need to be filled, especially in the areas of data protection, transparency, and dispute resolution procedures, despite Indonesia's notable legislative advancements in the online lending sector, according to this report. Originality/Value: Taking into account the local market's features and the degree of financial knowledge of the Indonesian populace, this study suggests that Indonesia implement some of the best practices from the UK regulatory system.
Read full abstract