In their Policy Forum “China, India, and the environment” (19 March, p. [1457][1]), K. S. Bawa and colleagues argue that a bilateral engagement between China and India “will be vital for mitigating biodiversity loss, global warming, and deforestation.” Nobody doubts that bilateral cooperation between these two key nations is crucial for resolving such transboundary issues. However, there is considerable doubt as to whether Sino-Indian cooperation is best developed by concentrating on these two nations alone. China's impact on the environment extends much farther than India's; Beijing's interest in gaining access to Africa's raw materials presents a far more urgent cause for concern ([ 1 ][2]). Therefore, China and India must cooperate beyond the regional level in order to give their efforts a broader, global perspective. For example, if the two join forces with Brazil and Russia—two other nations now rising from underdevelopment—their joint efforts will affect 42% of the world's population. Their plans could encompass environmental security strategy as well as cooperation on green technologies and innovation. Bawa et al. proceed from the assumption that the military presence of China and India along their disputed border is damaging the Himalayan ecosystems. However, the authors have overlooked the possibility that, as perverse as it may seem, the fact that the Himalayan region is heavily militarized may actually protect its key habitats and rich biodiversity, because the area is not available for economic exploitation ([ 2 ][3]). The militaries of the two nations have a negligible environmental footprint in the Himalayas. Both countries use special fuel which must be airlifted to the location, and both are careful to cover the tracks of their deployments, for a variety of strategic reasons. To mix a sensitive territorial dispute with environmental efforts is a recipe for paralysis. At least for the moment, the Himalayas can wait; the world cannot. 1. [↵][4] 1. K. S.-H. Peh, 2. J. Eyal , Energy Pol. 38, 4729 (2010). [OpenUrl][5][CrossRef][6] 2. [↵][7] 1. G. E. Machlis, 2. T. Hanson , BioScience 58, 729 (2008). [OpenUrl][8][CrossRef][9][Web of Science][10] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1185164 [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1 in text [5]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DEnergy%2BPol.%26rft.volume%253D38%26rft.spage%253D4729%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252Fj.enpol.2010.02.028%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [6]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.028&link_type=DOI [7]: #xref-ref-2-1 View reference 2 in text [8]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBioScience%26rft.volume%253D58%26rft.spage%253D729%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1641%252FB580809%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [9]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1641/B580809&link_type=DOI [10]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000259058100011&link_type=ISI
Read full abstract