Total Hip Arthroplasty Group Research Articles

Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture.

Objectives:To investigate the effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:Clinical data from 110 femoral intertrochanteric fracture patients treated at our hospital between January 2019 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of surgical intervention used. One group included patients (n= 59) who had undergone PFNA internal fixation and another group (n=51) included patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. Perioperative situation, joint function progression, and complication incidence were assessed.Results:Total hip arthroplasty group was associated with longer operation durations, longer incisions, and more intraoperative blood loss than PFNA group (P<0.05). Joint function and pain scores in the total hip arthroplasty group were superior than PFNA group (P<0.05). The Harris score of total hip arthroplasty group was significantly higher than that of PFNA group at three, six and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). The rate of complications in patients after total hip arthroplasty was lower than that of PFNA group (P<0.05) within 12 months of the surgery.Conclusion:PFNA and total hip arthroplasty can both achieve good results for treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. PFNA offers less trauma and shorter operations, while total hip arthroplasty offers advantages in terms of more rapid limb function improvements and shorter rehabilitation processes. The two kinds of surgery have advantages, and the clinical needs to have a careful look at various factors and choose the appropriate operation method.

Central Sensitization and Postoperative Improvement of Quality of Life in Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Study.

ABSTRACTBackground:While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) lead to excellent clinical outcomes, some patients experience residual surgical site pain and reduced satisfaction. This prospective observational study investigated the prevalence of preoperative and postoperative residual central sensitization (CS) after TKA and THA. The influence of residual CS on the improvement in quality of life (QOL) was also investigated.Methods:The participants were 40 patients who underwent TKA and 47 patients who underwent THA. CS was measured using the central sensitization inventory (CSI) questionnaire. Knee symptoms were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scales (KOOS), and hip symptoms were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Hip-disease Evaluation Questionnaires (JHEQ). General QOL was evaluated using EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5l). Regression analysis was performed to estimate factors related to low QOL after surgery.Results:Preoperatively, 47.5% of TKA patients and 66.0% of THA patients were CS positive (P=0.083), which reduced to 10.0% (P=0.042) and 25.5% (P=0.202), respectively, 3 months after surgery. Although the improvements in KOOS subscales and EQ-5D-5l scores in TKA patients with residual CS were significantly lower than in those without residual CS, residual CS status had no effect on JHEQ subscales and EQ-5D-5l scores in THA patients. Regression analysis indicated that EQ-5D-5l was negatively correlated with CSI in the TKA group (P=0.017). In contrast, CSI was not correlated with EQ-5D-5l in the THA group (P=0.206).Conclusion:Postoperative QOL improvement was achieved 3 months after THA regardless of residual CS status. In contrast, preoperative CS was negatively associated with the improvement in QOL after TKA.

A comparative study of functional outcome of bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in fracture neck of femur in elderly patients

Introduction: Fractures of the femoral neck are an international public health problem mainly occurring in elderly patients and resulting in high mortality. With the aging population, the incidence of these fractures is steadily increasing. Treatment choices for the neck of femur fractures in the elderly age group includes hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip replacement (THR). The treatment option must be decided by the type of fracture, condition of the patient, functional demands, medical and mental ability to cope with the surgery. This study compares bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BH) and total hip replacement (THR) in elderly patients with neck of femur fracture. Aim: To evaluate the functional outcome, complications and mortality of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty as a treatment modality in neck of femur fracture patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, Rajah Muthiah medical college, in which 30 Patients of age 55 years and above who underwent hip arthroplasty (BHA or THA) for neck of femur fracture with follow up were included. Patients were separated into two groups by random allocation. Patients of group 1 (15 patients) were treated by bipolar hemiarthroplasty and group 2 (15 patients) by total hip arthroplasty. Both groups were followed up post-operatively for one year, at 6, 12 months, for surgical complications including dislocation, fracture, surgical site infection, and, one-year mortality and functional outcome using Modified Harris Hip Score. Results: Modified Harris Hip Score was higher in Total hip arthroplasty group compared to bipolar hemiarthroplasty group, pain was similar in both groups post operatively. Gait and range of motion were higher in the Total Hip Arthroplasty group, no significant difference was seen in mortality and post-operative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: In our study, we conclude that Total hip arthroplasty is ideal to treat femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with arthritic changes and has a lower risk of re operation when compared to Bipolar hemiarthroplasty, however bipolar hemiarthroplasty has a better outcome in cases of acute femoral neck fractures, based on our study.

High hip center arthroplasty in the treatment of severe hip dysplasia: Are knee and ankle compromised?

BackgroundThere is limited information about the effect of hip center location on gait parameters of knee and ankle. This study aimed to compare anatomical vs. high hip center arthroplasty according to gait parameters of knee and ankle and investigate whether the high hip center has any adverse effect on these joints or not. Methods20 patients who underwent unilateral total hip arthroplasty (Group 1; 10 patients with anatomical reconstruction, Group 2; 10 patients with high hip center) due to Crowe type III-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip and completed 2 years of follow-up were included. The patients were examined by 3-D gait analysis. FindingsThe maximum extension of the knee on the operated side was lower in Group 2 (p = 0.044). Longitudinal knee joint force was higher in Group 2 on both operated (p = 0.041) and non-operated sides (p = 0.031). Lateral knee joint force was also higher in Group 2 (p = 0.023). No significant difference was detected in ankle parameters. InterpretationUnilateral high hip center has been shown to restrict the dynamic knee range of motion on the operated side and increase the knee load on both sides, thus putting the knees at risk for osteoarthritis. Level of evidenceLevel III, Retrospective comparative study.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Influence the Development and Localization of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures?

Background: Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) are fractures related to reduced bone strength. In a previous study, we noticed that many patients with SIF had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to research the localization of clinically apparent SIFs in relation to unilateral THA as well as the influence of unilateral THA on bone mineral density changes in the sacrum. Methods: In this retrospective study, 171 patients with SIFs were screened for unilateral THA. In the group of patients with SIF and THA, the rate of SIF ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of the THA was determined. In a second cohort of 39 THA patients with healthy bone, changes in bone mineral density at the sacral alae ipsilateral and contralateral to the THA were analyzed by use of computed tomography immediately postoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up. Results: Of the 171 patients with SIF, 50 (40 female; mean age, 79 years; range, 54 to 101 years) were previously treated with THA. Of the 50, 31 patients were treated with unilateral THA. The proportion of patients with an SIF contralateral to the THA was 42% (13 of 31) and ipsilateral to the THA was 19% (6 of 31). Twelve patients had bilateral SIFs. The mean age of the THA group without SIF was 62 years (range, 49 to 79 years); 17 were female. The median bone mineral density decreased significantly (p = 0.023), from 35.0 to 13.0 HU, at the sacral ala contralateral to the THA, whereas the decrease of ipsilateral bone mineral density, from 24.0 to 17.0 HU, was not significant (p = 0.361). Conclusions: The proportion of patients with an SIF contralateral to a THA was twice as high as that of patients with an SIF ipsilateral to a THA. These findings are supported by the second cohort’s decrease in bone mineral density at the sacral ala contralateral to the THA at 1 year after surgery. We conclude that THA can lead to spatially different remodeling of the sacrum, possibly affecting the development of SIFs. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy and Safety of Thromboprophylaxis Post-Orthopedic Surgery.

Given the high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) post-orthopedic surgery and the vital role of thromboprophylaxis in preventing VTEs, this meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis post major orthopedic surgery and the relevant safety measures.In this review, we conducted a computer-aided search of Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Medline, and EMBASE databases. We included all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that utilized enoxaparin, fondaparinux, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), hip fracture surgery, and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on primary and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager Software.A total of 23 RCTs were included with a total sample of 48,424 patients and an overall low risk of bias. The efficacy of enoxaparin in preventing VTEs in the TKA group was significantly better than fondaparinux. In the THA group, the efficacy of enoxaparin was significantly better than apixaban. The efficacies of fondaparinux, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and aspirin were comparable to that of enoxaparin in reducing VTE-associated mortality, major bleeding, and adverse events. In conclusion, we found that all included drugs were non-inferior to enoxaparin in VTE-associated mortality, major bleeding, and adverse events.

Femoral Head and Liner Exchange in Patients with Atraumatic Dislocation. Results of a Retrospective Study with 6 Years Follow-Up.

Background and Objectives: Femoral head and liner exchange is an established treatment for polyethylene wear but has had a more limited role in the treatment of other conditions including dislocation, because of concerns about an increased postoperative dislocation rate. Some authors have considered dislocation associated with polyethylene wear to be a contraindication for this procedure. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective review evaluated the outcome of head and liner exchange in a small consecutively operated heterogeneous cohort of 20 patients who presented with dislocation unrelated to trauma, component malposition or component loosening. Of this group, 12 had prior primary total hip arthroplasty, and 8 had prior revision total hip arthroplasty, and included 4 patients with prior revision for dislocation. Mean follow-up was 6 ± 3.5 years (range 1–145 months). Results: Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a revision-free implant survival from any cause of 80% (confidence interval 95%:64.3–99.6%) at 5 years after head and liner exchange (index surgery). At final follow-up, 83.3% of patients (n = 10) with prior primary total hip arthroplasty and 62.5% of patients (n = 5) with prior revision total hip arthroplasty, had not required subsequent revision for any cause. None (0%) of the primary total hip arthroplasty group and 3 (38%) of the revision arthroplasty group had required revision for further dislocation. Of the eight revision arthroplasty patients, four had a prior revision for dislocation and three of these four patients required further revision for dislocation after index surgery. The fourth patient had no dislocation after index surgery. One additional patient who had prior revision surgery for femoral component fracture suffered dislocation after index surgery, but was successfully treated with closed reduction. Conclusions: In our study population, femoral head and liner exchange was an effective treatment option for patients with prior primary total hip arthroplasty and also for a highly select group of revision total arthroplasty patients with no prior history of dislocation. Femoral head and liner exchange does not appear to be a viable treatment option for patients who have had revision total arthroplasty after prior dislocations.

Timing of Total Hip Arthroplasty Affects Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes.

This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) within the PearlDiver Humana research database from 2010 to 2018. The aim of this study was to determine if timing of total hip arthroplasty (THA) affects LSF outcomes. In patients with both spine and hip pathology, outcomes of THA have been shown to be affected by the timing of THA relative to LSF. However, few studies have assessed postoperative outcomes following LSF in this clinical scenario. A national database was queried for patients undergoing lumbar fusion and divided into 4 groups: (1) those who underwent LSF without THA (No THA); (2) those who underwent THA at least 2 years before LSF (>2 Prior THA); (3) those who underwent THA in the 2 years before LSF (0-2 Prior THA); and (4) those who underwent THA after LSF (THA After). We assessed lumbar-specific outcomes, including pseudarthrosis, revision, mechanical failure, and adjacent segment disease (ASD); as well as systemic complications. Controlling for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index, complication rates between all groups were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the Fisher exact test with Bonferroni correction to account for multiple pairwise comparisons, resulting in an adjusted threshold for statistical significance of P<0.007. When compared with the no THA group, those in the THA After group had a higher rate of ASD on multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio: 1.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.20-1.94, P<0.001]. When compared with all patients who underwent THA before LSF, patients who underwent THA after LSF had an increased risk of ASD (adjusted odds ratio: 3.80, 95% confidence interval: 2.21-6.98, P<0.001). Patients who undergo THA after LSF have an increased rate of lumbar-related complications both when compared with patients who do not undergo THA and when compared with patients who undergo THA before LSF.

Patients Who Present with Functional Limitations, Limited Range of Motion and Reduced Muscle Strength 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective To evaluate levels of pain, range of motion, hip isometric peak torque, and functional task performance in patients 6 months after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to compare them to asymptomatic control participants (CG). Methods We recruited participants with unilateral THA due to hip osteoarthritis (OA) within a median of 6 months who had not developed postoperative complications. We assessed the pain levels, hip range of motion, peak isometric torque, self-reported assessment (Harris Hip Score) and objectively measured function (Timed Up & Go Test [TUG]) of the patients. The THA group was compared with a group of asymptomatic participants ≥50 years old recruited in the community. Comparisons are presented as mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 23 participants were included in each group. Pain levels were low in the THA group (1.48 [1.60]), and 91.3% of the patients reported to be satisfied with the surgical procedure. Participants in the THA group reported significantly lower objectively measured (THA 12.2 [10.0-21.6]; CG 9.0 [6.7-12.2]) and self-reported function (THA 78.5 [43.8-93.9]; CG 100.0 [95.8-100.0]) compared with CG. The THA group also had significantly reduced range of motion for flexion ( p < 0.001), internal ( p < 0.001) and external rotation ( p = 0.003) movements and reduced peak torque for flexion ( p < 0.001), extension ( p < 0.001), abduction ( p < 0.001) and adduction ( p = 0.024) movements compared with participants of the CG. Conclusions Despite reporting overall low pain scores and satisfaction with the surgery, the patients present with functional limitations, limited range of motion, and reduced muscle strength 6 months after THA. Evidence Level 3b.

Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BackgroundHip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are two treatment options for end-stage degenerative hip conditions. The objective of this single-center retrospective cohort study was to compare implant survival and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in young patients (≤35 years) who underwent HRA or THA.MethodsAll patients aged 35 years or younger who underwent HRA or THA with a single high-volume arthroplasty surgeon between 2004 and 2015 were reviewed. The sample included 33 THAs (26 patients) and 76 HRAs (65 patients). Five-year implant survival and minimum 2-year PROs were compared between patient cohorts.ResultsThree patients in the THA group (9%) were revised within 5 years for instability (n = 1), squeaking (n = 1), or squeaking with a ceramic liner fracture (n = 1). No patients who underwent HRA were revised. The University of California, Los Angeles, activity score, modified Harris Hip score, and Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement increased by 74%, 64%, and 49%, respectively, among all patients. Compared to the HRA cohort, patients who underwent THA had lower preoperative and postoperative University of California, Los Angeles, activity, modified Harris Hip score, and Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores for Joint Replacement scores, yet there were no differences in the absolute improvements in any of the three measures between the two groups.ConclusionsExcellent functional outcomes were seen in young patients undergoing either HRA or THA. Although young patients undergoing THA started at lower preoperative baseline and postoperative PROs than patients undergoing HRA, both groups improved by an equal amount after surgery, suggesting that both HRA and THA afford a similar degree of potential improvement in a young population.

Is primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with Down's syndrome associated with increased complications at 2years follow-up?

Previous reports on primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with Down's syndrome (DS) are often small and/or lack a comparison cohort, and thus it is challenging to draw meaningful conclusions about this group. The purpose of this study was to report on the post-operative complications in patients with DS undergoing primary THA, compared to a non-DS cohort. In this retrospective study, we evaluated patients from 2010 to 2018 using a national database. We assessed surgical complications: closed reduction for dislocation, revision, resection, periprosthetic fracture, and infection in patients with a diagnosis of DS undergoing primary THA and compared them to a THA group of patients without DS. Patients undergoing THA for hip fractures were excluded. Complications were evaluated at 90days and 2years. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for age, sex, body mass index, and Charlson comorbidity index. At 90days patients with DS had an increased risk of revision (OR 3.1, CI 1.14-8.41), but no significant risk of resection (OR 5.24, CI 0.73-37.8), closed reduction (OR 2.03, CI 0.28-14.59), infection (OR 1.48, CI 0.6-3.62), or periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.97, CI 0.27-14.14). At 2years patients with DS had an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture (OR 5.88, CI 1.84-18.78), but no significant increased risk of revision (OR 1.82, CI 0.66-5.01), resection (OR 2.37, CI 0.33-17.17), or infection (OR 0.65, CI 0.2-2.07). Primary THA in patients with DS is associated with increased 90-day revision, and periprosthetic fracture at 2years.

Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with neuromuscular imbalance.

This study aimed at comparing clinical outcomes between total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) inelderly patients with neuromuscular imbalance (stroke, Parkinsonism, etc.). A total of 226 elderly patients with neuromuscular imbalance and femoral neck fractures treated with THA or HA were recruited at a single center, and their clinical data retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up time was 40.5months (range 24-78), the primary outcome was secondary hip procedure while secondary outcomes included function, pain, health-related quality of life, complications, and death. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine the estimated survivorship, with re-operation as the end point. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of different surgical procedures on mortality while linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the function, pain and quality of life. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, with an end point of re-operation for any reason in the THA group, was 90.3% (95% CI 82.3-98.3), which was not significantly different from 95.9% (95% CI 93.0-98.8) for the HA group (p = 0.137). The most common cause of re-operation in both groups was dislocation. There were no significant differences with regards to postoperative complications (including dislocation). Compared to HA, THA exhibited better functional outcomes, quality of life and low pain intensity. Notably, there was no difference in 2year mortality rates between the groups, however, HA was associated with a higher mortality rate beyond 2years (OR 0.137; 95% CI 0.030-0.630; p = 0.011). THA is an effective therapeutic procedure for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with neuromuscular imbalance.

Differences of 2-year longitudinal changes of locomotive syndrome among patients treated with thoracolumbar interbody fusion, total hip arthroplasty, and total knee arthroplasty for degenerative diseases.

To clarify the longitudinal changes in patients with preoperative Stage-3 locomotive syndrome (LS) according to different types of surgeries, we investigated the changes in the LS stage in patients who underwent surgery for degenerative musculoskeletal diseases. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 168 patients with degenerative diseases [46 spinal deformities treated with thoracolumbar interbody fusion (T/LIF), 86 hips with osteoarthritis treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA), and 36 knees with osteoarthritis treated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA)]. The results for the LS stage, stand-up test, two-step test, and 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperatively, most patients had Stage-3 LS (89.1, 90.8, and 80.6% in the T/LIF, THA, and TKA groups, respectively). At 2 years postoperatively, the Stage-3 LS improved in 41.5, 75.6, and 55.2% of patients in the T/LIF, THA, and TKA groups, respectively. All groups showed similar improvements in the two-step test. The THA group showed the best result in the GLFS-25. LS stage improved in different patterns over 2 years postoperatively and the LS risk test revealed differences in postoperative movement ability according to the type of surgery.

No benefits of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via Watson-Jones approach: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionThere is controversy about the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The present study aimed to investigate whether a MIS approach has a positive impact on the outcome of THA via the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. Clinical scores and radiological findings of minimally and standard invasive exposures were evaluated and compared. MethodsThe present study was conducted according to the STROBE statement. Patients operated between 2017 and 2018 in two different orthopaedic institutions was performed. Patients with symptomatic coxarthrosis reducing considerably patient's quality of life were asked to participate in the present study. Patients were divided into two THA groups: MIS and standard invasive surgery (SIS). Surgical procedures were performed in by two experienced surgeons via the Watson-Jones approach. ResultsData from 140 patients were collected (70 patients for each group) at two years follow-up. Leg length discrepancy was greater in the MIS cohort (P = 0.01). The Stiffness subscale of the WOMAC score resulted minimally increased in the SIS group (P = 0.03). The overall WOMAC score and the other subscales resulted similar between the two groups. Femoral offset, acetabular offset, cup orientation, cup inclination, VAS resulted similar between the two cohorts. Only a case of revision in the SIS group was reported. ConclusionTHA via the Watson-Jones approach achieves short terms excellent results. Surgery performed via a MIS approach does not provide any superior outcome compared to the SIS in terms of radiographic findings and clinical scores at two years follow-up.

Tranexamic acid is safe and effective in patients with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation during total joint arthroplasty.

Patients with an inherent hypercoagulable state are at a higher risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Further administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) during TJA may increase the risk of VTE in these high-risk patients. There is no study that specifically analyzes the safety and efficacy of TXA during TJA in patients with factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation; therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TXA use on the risk of VTE and bleeding in patients carrying FVL mutation. A total of 42 patients with FVL mutation (22 hips, 20 knees) and 40 control patients (20 hips, 20 knees) who underwent TJA were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received 1g TXA intravenously 15min before the skin incision and 2g of TXA was administered locally at the surgical site as a periarticular injection. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (low-molecular-weight heparin) was administered to all patients. Estimated blood loss and in-hospital thromboembolic complications were compared between the groups. In both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients, there was no significant difference in the amount of estimated blood loss among the groups (p = 0.980, and p = 0963, respectively). None of the patients in the THA group received a blood transfusion. The transfusion rate was similar in the TKA group (p = 0.756, one patient in each group). No VTE, myocardial infarction, or any other complications related to TXA use were observed in any of the patients. The combined local and systemic administration of TXA could be safely used in patients with heterozygous FVL mutation receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during TJA without increasing the risk of VTE.

Plantar Pressure Distribution during Standing in Female Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis Who Underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction: Assessment of plantar pressure indicates the manner in which the plantar region contacts the ground as the first point in a leg-linked kinetic chain, and receives force from the ground. However, few studies have examined the changes in plantar pressure distribution in patients who underwent Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) before and after THA, or compared plantar pressure distribution between THA patients and healthy adults. Objective: Plantar pressure distribution in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis who undergo THA may be adjusted to that in healthy adults by correcting leg length discrepancy. Herein, our objective was to find out if the plantar pressure distribution during standing differs before and after THA, and between healthy adults and THA patients. Design: Case control study. Setting: Single orthopedic clinic in Japan. Participants: THA patients (n=58; THA group) and healthy adults (n=53; control group). Interventions: Not applicable. Main outcome measure(s): The maximum plantar pressure under each foot measured during standing for 20 s was assessed for location, symmetry, and leg length discrepancy. Results: The distribution plantar pressure in the THA group differed preand postoperatively. The maximum plantar pressure region was the heel in approximately 80% of the patients three months after THA; it was not different in THA patients three months postoperatively and in healthy adults. Patients with asymmetrical maximum plantar pressure regions were those whose postoperative maximum plantar pressure region in the affected leg was the forefoot and those whose maximum plantar pressure region in the affected leg shifted to the heel. The leg length discrepancies decreased significantly after THA. Conclusions: The plantar pressure distribution during standing in female patients adjusted to that in healthy adults after THA. Patients with asymmetrical distribution of maximum plantar pressure may benefit from balance assessment and physical therapy.

Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision

Background and purpose — In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the risk for dislocation can be reduced using either dual-mobility cups (DMCs) or constrained liners (CLs). There are few studies comparing these concepts in primary THA. Therefore, we compared the cumulative incidence of revision in primary THA patients treated with DMC or CL with varying head sizes with conventional THA patients as reference group. Patients and methods — We performed a cohort study based on the Finnish arthroplasty register, comparing DMCs and CLs operated over the period 2000–2017. DMCs were divided into 2 groups based on the implant design: “DMC Trident” group (n = 399) and “DMC Others” group (n = 263). CLs were divided based on the femoral head size: “CL 36 mm” group (n = 425) and “CL < 36 mm” group (n = 302). All conventional primary THAs operated on in 2000–2017 with 28–36 mm femoral head were included as control group (“Conventional THA” group, n = 102,276). Implant survival was calculated by the corresponding cumulative incidence function with revision as the endpoint and death as competing event. Also, the prevalence of different reasons for revision was compared. Results — The 6-year cumulative incidence function estimates for the first revision were 6.9% (95% CI 4.0–9.7) for DMC Trident, 5.0% (CI 1.5–8.5) for DMC Others, 13% (CI 9.3–17) for CL < 36 mm, 6.3% (3.7–8.9) for CL 36 mm, and 4.7% (CI 4.5–4.8) for control group (conventional THA). The prevalence of dislocation revision was high (5.0%, CI 2.9–8.2) in the CL < 36 mm group compared with other groups. Interpretation — The DMC and CL 36 mm groups had promising mid-term survival rates, comparable to those of primary conventional THA group. The revision rate of CLs with < 36 mm head was high, mostly due to high prevalence of dislocation revisions. Therefore, CLs with 36 mm femoral head should be preferred over smaller ones.

The Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrumentation with Laser Guidance in a Dynamic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Radiological Evaluation.

The functional positioning of components in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its relationship with individual lumbopelvic kinematics and a patient’s anatomy are being extensively studied. Patient-specific kinematic planning could be a game-changer; however, it should be accurately delivered intraoperatively. The main purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and laser-guided technique to replicate preoperative dynamic planning. Thirty-six patients were prospectively enrolled and received dynamic hip preoperative planning based on three functional lateral spinopelvic X-rays and a low dose CT scan. Three-dimensional (3D) printed PSI guides and laser-guided instrumentation were used intraoperatively. The orientation of the components, osteotomy level and change in hip length and offset were measured on postoperative CT scans and compared with the planned preoperative values. The length of surgery was compared with that of a matched group of thirty-six patients who underwent a conventional THA. The mean absolute deviation from the planned inclination and anteversion was 3.9° and 4.4°, respectively. In 92% of cases, both the inclination and anteversion were within +/− 10° of the planned values. Regarding the osteotomy level, offset change and limb length change, the mean deviation was, respectively, 1.6 mm, 2.6 mm and 2 mm. No statistically significant difference was detected when comparing the planned values with the achieved values. The mean surgical time was 71.4 min in the PSI group and 60.4 min in the conventional THA group (p < 0.05). Patient-specific and laser-guided instrumentation is safe and accurately reproduces dynamic planning in terms of the orientation of the components, osteotomy level, leg length and offset. Moreover, the increase in surgical time is negligible.

Are the First and Second Hip in Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty Equal? A Hospital Adverse Event and Perioperative Risk Comparison

AbstractHospital adverse events remain a significant issue; even “minor events” may lead to increased costs. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous investigation has compared perioperative events between the first and second hip in staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study, we perform such a comparison. A retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of 172 patients (344 hips) who underwent staged bilateral THAs performed by two surgeons at a single institution (2010–2016). Based on chronological order of the staged arthroplasties, two groups were set apart: first-staged THA and second-staged THA. Baseline-demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, hospital adverse events, and hospital transfusions were compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests, Fisher's exact test, and/or Pearson's chi-squared test. The mean time between staged surgeries was 465 days. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between first-staged THA and second-staged THA groups (patients were their own controls). The mean LOS was significantly longer in the first-staged THA group than in the second (2.2 vs. 1.8 days; p &lt; 0.001). Discharge (proportion) to a facility other than home was noticeably higher in the first-staged THA group, although not statistically significant (11.0 vs. 7.6%; p = 0.354). The rate of hospital adverse events in the first-staged THA group was almost twice that of the second (37.2 vs. 20.3%; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in transfusion rates. However, these were consistently better in the second-staged THA group. When compared with the first THA, our findings suggest overall shorter LOS and fewer hospital adverse events following the second. Level of Evidence Level III.

Histological and ultrastructural degenerative findings in the gluteus medius tendon after hip arthroplasty

BackgroundDespite gluteus medius (GMED) tendinosis being relatively common, its presence in association with hip osteoarthritis (OA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well studied. It was hypothesized that more tendon degeneration would be found in patients with OA of the hip and in those that had undergone THA than that in a control group.MethodsOne hundred patients were included between 2016 and 2019 and were included into 4 groups; the patients were undergoing revision surgery in two groups and primary THA in the other two groups; 22 patients had previously undergone primary THA through a direct lateral approach (involving sectioning of the GMED tendon), 24 patients had previously undergone primary THA through a posterior approach (leaving the GMED tendon intact), 29 patients had primary hip OA, and 25 patients who suffered a femoral neck fracture served as controls. Biopsies from the GMED tendon were obtained at the time of the primary THA or the hip revision surgery. The tendon biopsies were examined ultrastructurally and histologically.ResultsUltrastructurally, the direct lateral and posterior revision groups had statistically significantly more collagen fibrils with smaller diameters compared with the fracture and primary THA groups. Moreover, the direct lateral revision group had more collagen fibrils with smaller diameters compared with the posterior revision group.Histologically, the direct lateral revision group had a higher total degeneration score (TDS) compared with the primary hip OA group.ConclusionsThe GMED tendon shows more ultrastructural degeneration in patients who undergo hip revision arthroplasty than in patients with primary OA of the hip and control patients, who had suffered a femoral neck fracture. Furthermore, patients who had previously undergone primary THA through a direct lateral approach revealed more histological GMED tendon degeneration than patients who suffer primary hip OA.