No benefits of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via Watson-Jones approach: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract

IntroductionThere is controversy about the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The present study aimed to investigate whether a MIS approach has a positive impact on the outcome of THA via the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. Clinical scores and radiological findings of minimally and standard invasive exposures were evaluated and compared. MethodsThe present study was conducted according to the STROBE statement. Patients operated between 2017 and 2018 in two different orthopaedic institutions was performed. Patients with symptomatic coxarthrosis reducing considerably patient's quality of life were asked to participate in the present study. Patients were divided into two THA groups: MIS and standard invasive surgery (SIS). Surgical procedures were performed in by two experienced surgeons via the Watson-Jones approach. ResultsData from 140 patients were collected (70 patients for each group) at two years follow-up. Leg length discrepancy was greater in the MIS cohort (P = 0.01). The Stiffness subscale of the WOMAC score resulted minimally increased in the SIS group (P = 0.03). The overall WOMAC score and the other subscales resulted similar between the two groups. Femoral offset, acetabular offset, cup orientation, cup inclination, VAS resulted similar between the two cohorts. Only a case of revision in the SIS group was reported. ConclusionTHA via the Watson-Jones approach achieves short terms excellent results. Surgery performed via a MIS approach does not provide any superior outcome compared to the SIS in terms of radiographic findings and clinical scores at two years follow-up.