Abstract

The functional positioning of components in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its relationship with individual lumbopelvic kinematics and a patient’s anatomy are being extensively studied. Patient-specific kinematic planning could be a game-changer; however, it should be accurately delivered intraoperatively. The main purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and laser-guided technique to replicate preoperative dynamic planning. Thirty-six patients were prospectively enrolled and received dynamic hip preoperative planning based on three functional lateral spinopelvic X-rays and a low dose CT scan. Three-dimensional (3D) printed PSI guides and laser-guided instrumentation were used intraoperatively. The orientation of the components, osteotomy level and change in hip length and offset were measured on postoperative CT scans and compared with the planned preoperative values. The length of surgery was compared with that of a matched group of thirty-six patients who underwent a conventional THA. The mean absolute deviation from the planned inclination and anteversion was 3.9° and 4.4°, respectively. In 92% of cases, both the inclination and anteversion were within +/− 10° of the planned values. Regarding the osteotomy level, offset change and limb length change, the mean deviation was, respectively, 1.6 mm, 2.6 mm and 2 mm. No statistically significant difference was detected when comparing the planned values with the achieved values. The mean surgical time was 71.4 min in the PSI group and 60.4 min in the conventional THA group (p < 0.05). Patient-specific and laser-guided instrumentation is safe and accurately reproduces dynamic planning in terms of the orientation of the components, osteotomy level, leg length and offset. Moreover, the increase in surgical time is negligible.

Highlights

  • Malposition of the acetabular cup could lead to instability, edge loading, osteolysis and squeezing, having a significant effect on the implant performance and patient outcomes [3,4]

  • The main findings of this study highlighted that the OPSTM patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) guides and laser-guided technique accurately reproduced dynamic planning with regard to the size and orientation of components, osteotomy level and change in length and offset

  • A variation in the sagittal pelvic tilt can occur in supine, standing and sitting positions and has a substantial effect on the functional anteversion and inclination of the acetabulum [9,24,28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The proper positioning of components in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) represents a crucial aspect for assuring an adequate stability, equalizing limb length discrepancies and recreating the appropriate offset. Accurate alignment is key to optimizing the functional outcomes and to reducing the rates of dislocation, impingement, aseptic loosening and other wear-related complications [1,2]. The orientation of the acetabular cup is one of the most important factors under the surgeon’s control. Malposition of the acetabular cup could lead to instability, edge loading, osteolysis and squeezing, having a significant effect on the implant performance and patient outcomes [3,4]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call