e20014 Background: Since 2011, two therapies that provide novel approaches to the treatment of advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma have been introduced to the market: ipilimumab for second line and vemurafenib for BRAF mutation-positive melanoma. It is not known how the new drugs influence treatment; this study investigated current treatment patterns in advanced melanoma. Methods: A clinician-validated, web-based survey was administered between August and November 2012 to clinicians who treat advanced melanoma in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Respondents were asked about their treatment of patients in the previous 12 months, including treatment modalities and pharmaceutical therapies used, and factors that affect treatment choice. Results: 150 oncologists and dermatologists completed the survey, 30 in each country. Pharmaceutical therapy was more commonly used than other treatment modalities and varied by stage of disease. A high proportion of patients with late stage of disease were treated with pharmaceutical therapy in Germany (85% in M1B) and France (83% in M1C). Among the countries, 51% (Italy) to 87% (France) of respondents test BRAF mutation status. In patients with wild-type BRAF tumors, dacarbazine, which has not been shown to provide any overall survival benefit, was the most commonly used drug for first-line therapy in all countries. In mutated BRAF tumors, vemurafenib was the most commonly used drug in first line therapy in 3 of 5 countries. There was no standard of care in second line for either patients with wild-type or mutated-BRAFtumors; therapies used included fotemustine, temozolomide, interferon, paclitaxel, and ipilimumab. Conclusions: Treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma are limited, particularly for patients with wild-type BRAF disease. In second line, there does not appear to be an established standard of care: a range of treatments are used, including several not indicated for melanoma.
Read full abstract