The use of Fick's law for the description of the moisture content has been questioned for years by several scientists. A modern contribution was recently published with an interesting approach (Nakano 1994a, b). Unfortunately, these articles contained some mistakes that were corrected by another author (Babiak 1995). Parallel to that discussion, another discussion about the choice of a proper potential for the moisture transport in a hygroscopic material like wood has taken place (Bramhall 1995). In this latter reference the partial vapor pressure in the air that is in equilibrium with the material, was used as the potential for the moisture transport and it was shown that this potential is a function of the wood state. It has also been shown that this choice of potential is unique, because all other potential will contain gradients of the state variables in the description of the moisture transport (Hunter 1993). The problem with the partial pressure is that it is not directly measurable in an ordinary sorption experiment, where the weight of the material easily can be measured as a function of the time. The mean moisture content of the board is the most important quantity in drying of wood in practice and therefore, for applications the used potential must be transformed to the moisture content somewhere in the analysis in order to he useful. Fick's law is empirical but has been very successful in descriptions of transport processes. The validity of Fick's law can of course be questioned, but then the observations must clearly and unambiguously show that the real problem is the assumption of the Fick's law. This problem and similar ones have been discussed earlier, but no one seems to have been able to give a proper suggestion (Kayihan 1993). A new approach has recently been published and that is focused on the surface conditions appearing in the boundary conditions for the differential equation of Fick's law (Babiak 1995). The surface moisture content is assumed to approach equilibrium as an exponential. Another similar approach would be to introduce a surface emission factor in analogy with heat transfer in heat transport theory. This was mentioned in Babiak's letter to the editor, but it was not developed (Babiak 1995). A surface emission factor is introduced in the one dimensional case through: