tDCS Group Research Articles

Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with amantadine in repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in rats

BackgroundBalance and memory deficits are common in patients with repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).ObjectiveTo investigate the combined effects of amantadine and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on balance and memory in repetitive mTBI rat models.MethodsIn this prospective animal study, 40 repetitive mTBI rats were randomly assigned to four groups: tDCS, amantadine, combination of amantadine and anodal tDCS, and control. The tDCS group received four sessions of anodal tDCS for four consecutive days. The amantadine group received four intraperitoneal injections of amantadine for four consecutive days. The combination group received four intraperitoneal injections of amantadine and anodal tDCS for four consecutive days. Motor-evoked potential (MEP), rotarod test, and novel object test results were evaluated before mTBI, before treatment, and after treatment.ResultsAll groups showed significant improvements in the rotarod and novel object tests, particularly the combination group. The combination group showed a significant improvements in duration (p < 0.01) and maximal speed in the rotarod test (p < 0.01), as well as an improvement in novel object ratio (p = 0.05) and MEP amplitude (p = 0.05) after treatment. The combination group exhibited a significant increase in novel object ratio compared to the tDCS group (p = 0.04). The GFAP integral intensity of the left motor cortex and hippocampus was the lowest in the combination group.ConclusionCombination treatment with amantadine and tDCS had positive effects on balance and memory recovery after repetitive mTBI in rats. Therefore, we expect that the combination of amantadine and tDCS may be a treatment option for patients with repetitive mTBIs.

Anodal-TDCS over Left-DLPFC Modulates Motor Cortex Excitability in Chronic Lower Back Pain.

Chronic pain is associated with abnormal cortical excitability and increased pain intensity. Research investigating the potential for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate motor cortex excitability and reduce pain in individuals with chronic lower back pain (CLBP) yield mixed results. The present randomised, placebo-controlled study examined the impact of anodal-tDCS over left-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left-DLPFC) on motor cortex excitability and pain in those with CLBP. Nineteen participants with CLBP (Mage = 53.16 years, SDage = 14.80 years) received 20-min of sham or anodal tDCS, twice weekly, for 4 weeks. Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were assessed using paired-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation prior to and immediately following the tDCS intervention. Linear Mixed Models revealed no significant effect of tDCS group or time, on SICI or ICF. The interactions between tDCS group and time on SICI and ICF only approached significance. Bayesian analyses revealed the anodal-tDCS group demonstrated higher ICF and SICI following the intervention compared to the sham-tDCS group. The anodal-tDCS group also demonstrated a reduction in pain intensity and self-reported disability compared to the sham-tDCS group. These findings provide preliminary support for anodal-tDCS over left-DLPFC to modulate cortical excitability and reduce pain in CLBP.

¬Transcranial direct current stimulation improves sleep quality in patients with insomnia after traumatic brain injury

ABSTRACT Introduction Insomnia is a serious problem after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and partially improves via sleeping pills. We investigated the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with a focus on the role of age and gender. Materials and Methods In a randomized double-blind clinical trial, 60 eligible TBI-induced insomnia patients were assigned to real and sham tDCS groups and were treated for three weeks. Sham but not real tDCS took sleeping pills for the first three weeks of the study and then used the placebo until the end of the study. The placebo was used by the real-tDCS group throughout the study. Sleep quality and insomnia severity were respectively evaluated by Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) at three time points. Results Real tDCS group reported lower mean ISI and PSQI scores at 3 weeks post treatment onset and maintained this decline for six weeks post treatment onset (P < 0.001). In younger participants and those identified as men, the treatment-induced attenuation of the mean PSQI score was reported higher and more lasting in real than sham tDCS groups. Conclusion Gender and age-specific tDCS protocols may be warranted to optimize the therapeutic effect of tDCS.

Distinct roles of the medial prefrontal cortex in advantageous and disadvantageous inequity aversion

Human beings have a strong preference for the fair distribution of resources in situations of both advantageous and disadvantageous inequity. Neuroimaging studies have shown that the process of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity aversion involves distinct brain regions. However, little is known about the causal roles of the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in these two types of inequity aversion. To clarify the roles of the dmPFC in both types of inequity aversion, 70 subjects were recruited and randomly assigned to two anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) groups: tDCS over the dmPFC and tDCS over the primary visual cortex. Participants then completed a dictator game, which was used to measure the aversion to inequity. This study found that tDCS over the dmPFC decreased the aversion to disadvantageous inequity, but not that to advantageous inequity, and the treatment effect was modulated by equity cost. These results show that the dmPFC plays different roles in these two types of inequity aversion.

Comparing transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus: Effects on divergent and convergent thinking.

The essential role of creativity has been highlighted in several human knowledge areas. Regarding the neural underpinnings of creativity, there is evidence about the role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on divergent thinking (DT) and convergent thinking (CT). Transcranial stimulation studies suggest that the left DLPFC is associated with both DT and CT, whereas left IFG is more related to DT. However, none of the previous studies have targeted both hubs simultaneously and compared transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and random noise stimulation (tRNS). Additionally, given the relationship between cognitive flexibility and creativity, we included it in order to check if the improvement in creativity may be mediated by cognitive flexibility. In this double-blind, between-subjects study, 66 healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups (N = 22) that received a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), or sham for 20 min. The tDCS group received 1.5 mA with the anode over the left DLPFC and cathode over the left IFG. Locations in tRNS group were the same and they received 1.5 mA of high frequency tRNS (100-500 Hz). Divergent thinking was assessed before (baseline) and during stimulation with unusual uses (UU) and picture completion (PC) subtests from Torrance Creative thinking Test, whereas convergent thinking was evaluated with the remote association test (RAT). Stroop test was included to assess cognitive flexibility. ANCOVA results of performance under stimulation (controlling for baseline performance) showed that there were significant differences in PC (F = 3.35, p = 0.042, = 0.10) but not in UU (F = 0.61, p = 0.546) and RAT (F = 2.65, p = 0.079) scores. Post-hoc analyses showed that tRNS group had significantly higher scores compared to sham (p = 0.004) in PC. More specifically, tRNS showed higher performance in fluency (p = 0.012) and originality (p = 0.021) dimensions of PC compared to sham. Regarding cognitive flexibility, we did not find any significant effect of any of the stimulation groups (F = 0.34, p = 0.711). Therefore, no further mediation analyses were performed. Finally, the group that received tDCS reported more adverse effects than sham group (F = 3.46, p = 0.035). Altogether, these results suggest that tRNS may have some advantages over tDCS in DT.

TDCS over the left prefrontal Cortex improves mental flexibility and inhibition in geriatric inpatients with symptoms of depression or anxiety: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Patients with depression and/or anxiety are commonly seen in inpatient geriatric settings. Both disorders are associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairments, notably in executive functioning. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a type of non-invasive brain stimulation, involves the administration of a low-dose electrical current to induce neuromodulation, which ultimately may act on downstream cognitive processing. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of tDCS on executive functioning in geriatric inpatients with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Specialized geriatric wards in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital. Thirty older-aged adults were recruited, of which twenty completed ten-to-fifteen sessions of 1.5 mA anodal or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive assessments were administered at baseline and following the tDCS protocol; analyses examined the effects of tDCS on cognitive performance between groups (anodal or sham tDCS). tDCS was found to increase inhibitory processing and cognitive flexibility in the anodal tDCS group, with significant changes on the Stroop test and Trail Making Test-Part B. No significant changes were observed on measures of attention or working memory. These results provide preliminary evidence that tDCS-induced neuromodulation may selectively improve cognitive processing in older adults with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04558177.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on neural activity and functional connectivity during fear extinction

Background/ObjectiveAnxiety disorders are highly prevalent and negatively impact daily functioning and quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), especially in the right hemisphere impacts extinction learning; however, the underlying neural mechanisms are elusive. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of cathodal tDCS stimulation to the right dlPFC on neural activity and connectivity patterns during delayed fear extinction in healthy participants. MethodsWe conducted a two-day fear conditioning and extinction procedure. On the first day, we collected fear-related self-reports, clinical questionnaires, and skin conductance responses during fear acquisition. On the second day, participants in the tDCS group (n = 16) received 20-min offline tDCS before fMRI and then completed the fear extinction session during fMRI. Participants in the control group (n = 18) skipped tDCS and directly underwent fMRI to complete the fear extinction procedure. Whole-brain searchlight classification and resting-state functional connectivity analyses were performed. ResultsWhole-brain searchlight classification during fear extinction showed higher classification accuracy of threat and safe cues in the left anterior dorsal and ventral insulae and hippocampus in the tDCS group than in the control group. Functional connectivity derived from the insula with the dlPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and inferior parietal lobule was increased after tDCS. ConclusiontDCS over the right dlPFC may function as a primer for information exchange among distally connected areas, thereby increasing stimulus discrimination. The current study did not include a sham group, and one participant of the control group was not randomized. Therefore, to address potential allocation bias, findings should be confirmed in the future with a fully randomized and sham controlled study.

Pilot-RCT Finds No Evidence for Modulation of Neuronal Networks of Auditory Hallucinations by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is used as treatment for auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH). The theory behind the treatment is that tDCS increases activity in prefrontal cognitive control areas, which are assumed to be hypoactive, and simultaneously decreases activity in temporal speech perception areas, which are assumed to be hyperactive during AVH. We tested this hypofrontal/hypertemporal reversal theory by investigating anatomical, neurotransmitter, brain activity, and network connectivity changes over the course of tDCS treatment. Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 21 patients receiving either sham or real tDCS treatment (2 mA) twice daily for 5 days. The anode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the cathode over the left temporo-parietal cortex (TPC). Multimodal neuroimaging as well as clinical and neurocognitive functioning assessment were performed before, immediately after, and three months after treatment. Results: We found a small reduction in AVH severity in the real tDCS group, but no corresponding neuroimaging changes in either DLPFCD or TPC. Limitations: The study has a small sample size. Conclusion: The results suggest that the currently leading theory behind tDCS treatment of AVH may need to be revised, if confirmed by studies with larger N. Tentative findings point to the involvement of Broca’s area as a critical structure for tDCS treatment.

Individual electric field predicts functional connectivity changes after anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation in chronic stroke

The neuromodulation effect of anodal tDCS is not thoroughly studied, and the heterogeneous profile of stroke individuals with brain lesions would further complicate the stimulation outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the functional changes in sensorimotor areas induced by anodal tDCS and whether individual electric field could predict the functional outcomes. Twenty-five chronic stroke survivors were recruited and divided into tDCS group (n = 12) and sham group (n = 13). Increased functional connectivity (FC) within the surrounding areas of ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) was only observed after anodal tDCS. Averaged FC among the ipsilesional sensorimotor regions was observed to be increased after anodal tDCS (t(11) = 2.57, p = 0.026), but not after sham tDCS (t(12) = 0.69, p = 0.50). Partial least square analysis identified positive correlations between electric field (EF) strength normal to the ipsilesional M1 surface and individual FC changes in tDCS group (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) but not in sham group (r = 0.21, p = 0.5). Our results indicated anodal tDCS facilitates the FC within the ipsilesional sensorimotor network in chronic stroke subjects, and individual electric field predicts the functional outcomes.

October 2022 Stroke Highlights.

October 2022 Stroke Highlights.

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with working memory training on working memory deficits in schizophrenic patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundWorking memory deficits are one of the core and most characteristic clinical features of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Cognitive training can improve the cognitive function of patients with schizophrenia. However, the overall and transfer effects of working memory treatment (WMT) require improvement. Numerous studies have confirmed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) enhances neuroplasticity in the brain, providing a new treatment approach for cognitive impairment in patients with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that a training mode combining “preheating” (tDCS, which changes the neural activity of working memory-related brain regions) and “ironing” (WMT) affords greater cognitive improvements than WMT alone. In addition, this study aims to examine the mechanisms underlying the superiority of tDCS combined with WMT in improving cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia.MethodsThis study will include 120 patients with schizophrenia aged 18–60 years. The patients will be randomized into four groups: the study group (tDCS + WMT), tDCS group (tDCS + simple response training, SRT), WMT group (sham tDCS + WMT), and control group (sham tDCS + SRT). Patients will receive 20-min, 2 mA sessions of active or sham tDCS twice a day on weekdays for 2 weeks. Each stimulation will be immediately followed by a 1 − 2-min rest and 40 min of WMT or SRT. The primary outcome is cognitive function, measured using Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and some subscales of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The secondary outcomes are other behavioral measures, variations in brain imaging, and serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). All outcomes will be measured at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up, except for brain imaging and BDNF levels, which will be measured at baseline and post-treatment only.DiscussionIf tDCS combined with WMT results in significant improvements and prolonged effects on working memory, this method could be considered as a first-line clinical treatment for schizophrenia. Moreover, these results could provide evidence-based support for the development of other approaches to improve cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia, especially by enhancing WMT effects.Trial registrationChictr.org.cn; ChiCTR2200063844. Registered on September 19, 2022.

Alteration of network connectivity in stroke patients with apraxia of speech after tDCS: A randomized controlled study.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the changes in the functional connectivity of the cortical speech articulation network after anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS) over the left lip region of the primary motor cortex (M1) in subacute post-stroke patients with apraxia of speech (AoS), and the effect of A-tDCS on AoS.MethodsA total of 24 patients with post-stroke AoS were randomized into two groups and received A-tDCS over the left lip region of M1 (tDCS group)/ sham tDCS (control group) as well as speech and language therapy two times per day for 5 days. Before and after the treatment, the AoS assessments and electroencephalogram (EEG) were evaluated. The cortical interconnections were measured using the EEG non-linear index of cross approximate entropy (C-ApEn).ResultsThe analysis of EEG showed that, after the treatment, the activated connectivity was all in the left hemisphere, and not only regions in the speech articulation network but also in the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the domain-general network were activated in the tDCS group. In contrast, the connectivity was confined to the right hemisphere and between bilateral DLPFC and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in the control group. In AoS assessments, the tDCS group improved significantly more than the control group in four of the five subtests. The results of multivariate linear regression analyses showed that only the group was significantly associated with the improvement of word repetition (P = 0.002).ConclusionA-tDCS over the left lip region of M1 coupled with speech therapy could upregulate the connectivity of both speech-specific and domain-general networks in the left hemisphere. The improved articulation performance in patients with post-stroke AoS might be related to the enhanced connectivity of networks in the left hemisphere induced by tDCS.Clinical trial registrationChiCTR-TRC-14005072.

Repeated long sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study

ObjectiveAlthough clinical trials have demonstrated that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective for seizure reduction, its long-term efficacy is unknown. This study aimed to determine the long-term effects of repeated cathodal long tDCS sessions on seizure suppression in patients with refractory epilepsy. MethodsPatients were recruited to participate in an extended phase of a previous randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, three-arm, parallel, multicenter study on tDCS. The patients were divided into an active tDCS group (20 min of tDCS per day) and an intensified tDCS group (2 × 20 min of tDCS per day). Each tDCS session lasted 2 weeks and the patients underwent repeated sessions at intervals of 2 to 6 months. The cathode was placed over the epileptogenic focus with the current intensity set as 2 mA. Seizure frequency reduction from baseline was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two related samples. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate group, time, and interaction effects. ResultsAmong the 19 patients who participated in the extended phase, 11 were in the active tDCS group and underwent 2–16 active tDCS sessions, and eight were in the intensified tDCS group and underwent 3–11 intensified tDCS sessions. Seizure reduction was significant from the first to the seventh follow-up, with a median seizure frequency reduction of 41.7%–83.3% (p < 0.05). Compared to the regular tDCS protocol, each intensified tDCS session substantially decreased seizure frequency by 0.3680 (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an increase of 8.5%–232.8% in the total number of seizures during three treatment sessions and follow-ups. ConclusionRepeated long cathodal tDCS sessions yielded significant and progressive long-term seizure reductions in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Efficacy of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Experimental Pain Sensitivity in Older Adults with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is encouraging regarding clinical pain intensity for individuals with knee osteoarthritis, very few studies have explored its impact on experimental pain sensitivity, which may hinder our understanding of underlying therapeutic mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of 15 home-based tDCS sessions on experimental pain sensitivity and explore its relationships with clinical pain intensity. We randomly assigned 120 participants to active tDCS (n = 60) and sham tDCS (n = 60). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) was used, including heat pain threshold and tolerance, pressure pain threshold, and conditioned pain modulation. Patients in the active tDCS group exhibited reduced experimental pain sensitivity as reflected by all QST measures at the end of treatment. Furthermore, correlations were observed between changes in clinical pain intensity and experimental pain sensitivity. These findings warrant further studies on tDCS and experimental pain sensitivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis and exploring the magnitude and sustainability of effects on a longer term.

A retrospective comparative cohort study of the effects of neural mobilization (NM) alone and NM combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and neural mobilization (NM) are widely used in clinical practice as two effective treatment. However, there have existed few studies of the combination of these two treatments, particularly in cervical radiculopathy (CR). To explore the value of combined tDCS and NM for the management of pain, disability, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with CR, authors designed this study. According to certain inclusion criteria, 36 subjects were selected from 224 patients with CR enrolled in Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between June 2021 and December 2021. Subjects were divided into two groups based on the treatment they had already received at the hospital. Patients in the combined tDCS group received tDCS and NM therapy, while patients in the NM group received NM therapy alone. Visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and EuroQuol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) scores were assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 4-week follow-up to evaluate pain, neck disability, and the QoL of patients. SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) is used as main tool for data analysis. A total of 36 patients were enrolled (19 in the combined tDCS group and 17 in the NM group). The baseline VAS, NDI, and EQ-5D scores in the combined tDCS group were 54.3±16.4 mm, 35.1±14.7, and 0.62±0.15, respectively, while the baseline VAS, NDI, and EQ-5D scores in the NM group were 54.0±16.5 mm, 31.8±12.8, and 0.64±0.15, respectively. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups. At the 4-week post-treatment follow-up, the VAS score was significantly lower in the combined tDCS group than in the NM group (24.5±16.1 and 40.7±17.3 mm, respectively, P=0.008), and the NDI was also significantly lower in the combined tDCS group than in the NM group (16.1±11.5 vs. 26.6±17.7, P=0.045). There was no significant difference between the combined tDCS and NM groups in EQ-5D (0.75±0.15 vs. 0.69±0.09, P=0.192). Compared with NM therapy alone, combined tDCS and NM therapy may play a role in pain relief and neck disability improvement in CR patients.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in children with ADHD: A randomized, sham-controlled pilot study

BackgroundADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with a pediatric prevalence of 5.2%.While medication treatment for ADHD is effective, it does not address all symptoms and a small but notable subgroup does not respond to medications. Adverse effects limit its use and some parents and participants resist use of medication. Thus, limitations of medication treatment for ADHD motivate searching for other therapeutic options. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been suggested as a treatment for children with ADHD, with mixed results to date. Protocol variables employed, including combined use of cognitive training (CT) and scheduling of sessions, may explain diverse findings to date. The aim of this study was to examine safety, feasibility and efficacy of tDCS combined with CT provided three-times-per week for one-month to treat children with ADHD. MethodsIn a double blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study, 25 children with ADHD were randomized to receive 12 sessions of either anodal tDCS or sham-tDCS for 20 min combined with CT three-times-per-week for four weeks. The tDCS anode was over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathode over vertex. Assessments were obtained prior to, after 6 sessions, 12 sessions and one-month after intervention. ResultsNo significant post-intervention differences were found between those receiving tDCS or sham-tDCS. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement on questionnaire measures of ADHD and executive function with mixed results seen on computerized performance measures. Overall, adverse effects were mild with no significant difference between groups. However, three children, all from the tDCS group, experienced headaches with two requiring temporary cessation and one requiring removal from the study. ConclusionsAnodal tDCS to the DLPFC using the above protocol in children with ADHD did not demonstrate additional treatment benefits beyond that of CT.

Adult ADHD Treatment Based on Combination of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) as Measured by Subjective and Objective Scales

Almost 30% of ADHD adults do not respond to standard pharmaceuticals. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a method for modulation of cortical excitability. On the other hand, dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) is a cognitive-behavioral approach that might be utilized for adults with ADHD. The effects of integration of these interventions are only beginning to be explored. In the present work, we used both subjective and objective measures to investigate the effects of tDCS, DBT, and the integration of the two in treating adult ADHD symptoms. A total of 80 adults with ADHD (63 females, 17 males) participated in the study and were grouped into control, DBT, tDCS, and combined groups. Based on the observed results, the combination of DBT and tDCS was significantly effective in improving the mentioned variables compared to administration of each method in isolation. The results are discussed in terms of neurophysiological and psychological aspects of treatment methods.

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the left middle temporal complex does not affect visual motion perception learning.

Visual perceptual learning (VPL) refers to the improvement in visual perceptual abilities through training and has potential implications for clinical populations. However, improvements in perceptual learning often require hundreds or thousands of trials over weeks to months to attain, limiting its practical application. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially facilitate perceptual learning, but the results are inconsistent thus far. Thus, this research investigated the effect of tDCS over the left human middle temporal complex (hMT+) on learning to discriminate visual motion direction. Twenty-seven participants were randomly assigned to the anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS groups. Before and after training, the thresholds of motion direction discrimination were assessed in one trained condition and three untrained conditions. Participants were trained over 5 consecutive days while receiving 4 × 1 ring high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) over the left hMT+. The results showed that the threshold of motion direction discrimination significantly decreased after training. However, no obvious differences in the indicators of perceptual learning, such as the magnitude of improvement, transfer indexes, and learning curves, were noted among the three groups. The current study did not provide evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS on VPL. Further research should explore the impact of the learning task characteristics, number of training sessions and the sequence of stimulation.

Association of low-dose naltrexone and transcranial direct current stimulation in fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blinded, parallel clinical trial

IntroductionFibromyalgia is a complex, generalized, and diffuse chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pharmacological approaches are widely used to relieve pain and increase quality of life. Low-Dose Naltrexone (LDN) was shown to increase the nociceptive threshold in patients with fibromyalgia. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is effective for pain management. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic and neuromodulatory effects of a combination of LDN and tDCS in patients with fibromyalgia. MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blinded, parallel, placebo/sham-controlled trial (NCT04502251; RBR-7HK8N) in which 86 women with fibromyalgia were included, and written informed consent was obtained from them. The patients were allocated into four groups: LDN + tDCS (n = 21), LDN + tDCS Sham (n = 22), placebo + tDCS (n = 22), and placebo+tDCS Sham (n = 21). The LDN or placebo (p.o.) intervention lasted 26 days; in the last five sessions, tDCS was applied (sham or active, 20 min, 2 mA). The following categories were assessed: sociodemographic, Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Profile of Chronic Pain Scale (PCP:S), Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). Blood samples were collected to analyze BDNF serum levels. ResultsAt baseline, no significant difference was found regarding all measurements. VAS pain was significantly reduced in the LDN + tDCS (p = 0.010), LDN + tDCS Sham (p = 0.001), and placebo+tDCS Sham (p = 0.009) groups. In the PCP:S, the LDN+tDCS group showed reduced pain frequency and intensity (p = 0.001), effect of pain on activities (p = 0.014) and emotions (p = 0.008). Depressive symptoms reduced after all active interventions (p > 0.001). ConclusionCombined LDN+tDCS has possible benefits in reducing pain frequency and intensity; however, a placebo effect was observed in pain using VAS, and further studies should be performed to analyze the possible association.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visuospatial attention in air traffic controllers.

Visuospatial attention is a cognitive skill essential to the performance of air traffic control activities. We evaluated the effect of an anodic session of transcranial low-intensity direct current stimulation (tDCS) right parietal associated with cognitive training of visuospatial attention of 21 air traffic controllers. Within-subject designs were used, with all volunteers undergoing two tDCS sessions; an experimental (2mA anodic) and control (sham) performed concomitantly with the cognitive training (2-Back). Visuospatial performance was measured using the Attention Network Test for Interactions and Vigilance pre- and post-intervention. The results indicate that after an active parietal tDCS session, the ATCOs showed faster responses, but not more accurate, for visuospatial attention in its aspects of orientation and reorientation. This result was significant when comparing baseline and post-tests in the active tDCS group. Comparing the post-tests between the tDCS active and sham groups, it is possible to infer a trend of improvement in the results based on faster and more accurate responses, which suggests a possible refinement of the ATCO's attentional orientation. However, this population may eventually have reached a plateau in the performance of this skill. From the analysis of the results we arrive at the following hypotheses: (I) the increase in cortical excitability mediated by anodic tDCS frequently recorded may not be accompanied by improvements in behavioural measures; (II) the interaction between anodic tDCS with another event of increased excitability-execution of a cognitive task, may have hindered the occurrence of neuroplasticity; (III) the air traffic control activity may be associated with a high level of attention, which may have contributed to a ceiling effect for the development of this skill; (IV) online assessments may be more relevant to identify acute effects; (V) repeated sessions may be more efficient to find cumulative effects; (VI) the analysis of interactions between attentional networks can contribute to the study of visuospatial attention; (VII) tDCS protocols aimed at ATCO need to consider the specifics of this audience, such as circadian rhythm and sleep and fatigue conditions.