BackgroundPreclinical students have limited exposure and training in surgical skills. As a result, many students report negative experiences during their surgery clerkship from a lack of confidence in their technical abilities and, thus, lower participation in cases. Moreover, in fields such as vascular surgery, where a shortage of physicians persists, the absence of surgery and field-specific exposure for medical students could limit recruitment. To address these gaps, we designed a surgical skills curriculum for preclinical medical students using surgical simulators to develop fundamental surgical skills, introduce students to vascular surgery early, and provide training on vascular surgery-specific procedures. We hypothesize that a surgical skills course can significantly enhance preclinical students' surgical abilities before they enter their surgical clerkship and increase interest in pursuing a surgical specialty. MethodsA total of 26 students took part in a structured surgical skills curriculum comprising three sections: fundamental surgical skills, application of skills in a clinical context, and a surgical skills competition. During the course of six workshops, the students received formative feedback from proctors using task-specific standardized rubrics and assessments through the Objective Standardized Assessment of Technical Skills. Additionally, students' attitudes and perceptions toward surgical training and vascular surgery were evaluated using the modified Vascular Surgery Interest Forum. The summative performance of the preclinical students enrolled in the surgical skills course was compared with their initial performance after the skills workshop and with that of third-year medical students who had completed surgical rotations. Differences in responses and attitudes were analyzed at the beginning and conclusion of the course using bivariate analysis. ResultsOf the 26 students, most were women (61.5%) and in their second year of medical school (76.9%). Also, 23.1% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine, 7.7% had physician family members, and 19.2% reported they had decided on a specialty. Following the knot-tying and suturing workshops, students reported a statistically significant increase in their self-rated understanding, comfort, and knowledge of tasks. Third-year medical students outperformed the preclinical students in knot-tying and instrument-tying tasks. However, no difference was found in the performance of these tasks between the third-year medical students and the top three preclinical students who completed the course. Both groups performed similarly on the anastomosis challenge (29.25 vs 28.42; P = .9) and the vascular simulation challenge (27.25 vs 26.83; P = .6). At the program's conclusion, the students demonstrated an increased mean interest in vascular surgery (from 2.3 ± 1.1 to 2.9 ± 1.2; P = .39), an enhanced interest in surgery due to its hands-on nature (from 4.5 ± 0.8 to 4.7 ± 0.6; P = .06), a preference for surgical simulation in teaching fundamental skills (from 3.7 ± 1.0 to 3.9 ± 0.8; P = .31), and an increased awareness of radiation exposure in surgical practice (from 2.5 ± 1.0 to 3.0 ± 1.3; P = .11). Students cited personality fit, exposure during medical school, and identification of a mentor as the most influential factors for pursuing a surgical career. The competitiveness of a residency program and resident workload and lifestyle were least influential. ConclusionsA structured surgical skills curriculum for preclinical medical students increased students' technical skills and fostered a greater appreciation for the hands-on and technical nature of surgery. Moreover, early exposure to vascular surgery enhanced their interest and knowledge of the field. Notably, students believed that medical school does not adequately prepare them for success on surgical rotations and emphasized the importance of personality fit, early exposure, and mentorship in considering a surgical career.
Read full abstract
Jan 15, 2024
Kenya Tada + 4
Open Access
