Indexed sequential modeling (ISM) has been proposed by the Western Area Power Administration as an alternative approach to developing firm marketable capacity, i.e., project-dependable hydropower capacity (PDC) in contrast with the usual approach of basing PDC on the most adverse period of record. ISM allows a probabilistic analysis of hydropower capacity by extracting a series of overlapping short-term (say, 10 year) inflow sequences directly from the historical record, which includes the most adverse period, and then simulating reservoir operations over this interval for each sequence. As a means of evaluating ISM, the New Melones Reservoir system in the federal Central Valley Project of California was selected as a case study for comparing hydropower output generated from ISM input with use of a multivariate stochastic inflow generation model. A comparison of monthly power and energy output at 95% confidence limits, 10% risk level, and most adverse, showed reasonably good correspondence between the two methods, except for a few months of energy production in the final year of simulation.