In the context of structural integrity assessment of cracked Steam Generator Tubes (SGTs), the Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) has been proposed as a modern tool able to reduce the conservativeness of traditional plastic limit load analyses. As different FAD failure curves are available in the literature, this paper presents a comparison between the so-called Options 1, 2 and 3 FAD curves derived for Inconel 690 and Incoloy 800 nuclear SGTs. Detailed Option 3 curves are obtained from elastoplastic finite element analyses and experimental data from fracture tests. Material-specific Option 2 curves are drawn from stress vs. strain data of uniaxial tests of SGTs. It is shown that the simplest generic Option 1 curve is conservative but appropriate for structural integrity assessments of cracked nuclear SGTs in operation. Alternatively, Option 3 FAD curves must be used when an excessive conservatism shall be avoided.
Read full abstract