From the Editor Dominic Rainsford The 25th Dickens Society Symposium, which would have marked the 150th anniversary of Dickens's death and was due to take place in London in splendid coordination with the Dickens Fellowship, shared the sad fate of so many events planned for this awful and astonishing year, and had to be cancelled. But all was not lost. The anniversary day itself, June 9th, was rescued for many of us by a Zoom-based conference, #Dickens 150, brilliantly managed by Emily Bell and Lydia Craig. Highlights included keynote lectures by Leon Litvack and Pete Orford, as well as a moving appeal for emergency support for the Dickens Museum from the Director, Cindy Sughrue. The proceeds from #Dickens 150 were donated to the Museum, which happily, as I write, is due to reopen on July 25th. Dickens would have had a great deal to say about the present situation, and we can only lament, as usual, that he is no longer with us. But we continue reading him because the world that he addressed in the nineteenth century is still in most respects our world. And of course, he knew a great deal about disease–physical, as well as mental and metaphorical–and how its processes of dissemination and unequal effects reveal (as they do now) all of the weaknesses and injustices of an entire social system. This grim timeliness, in Bleak House and elsewhere, was forcefully explored in another fine section of #Dickens 150: a roundtable on "Dickens and Contagion."1 While Dickens Quarterly must always keep its focus on Dickens's own era and the facts of life and art as they then applied, we will certainly embrace up-to-the-minute significance when it comes our way. It was a happy and thought-provoking coincidence, therefore, when we received in quick succession three unsolicited pieces which, in very different ways, address Dickens and misinformation or "fake news," ranging from an awkward misrepresentation of Dickens's wishes in his own lifetime (William F. Long), through the perpetuation over more than a century of erroneous dictionary definitions, with Dickens's authority taken in vain (David L. Gold), to the sometimes horrendously garbled abuse of Dickens as source of inspirational soundbites in social media (Lydia Craig). Some may feel that this is an [End Page 221] especially relevant area to explore in an issue of the Quarterly that coincides with the US Presidential election. But it would always be relevant, and may point the way (along with Adam Abraham's book, reviewed in this issue) towards a wider consideration of authenticity, authority, trust and sincerity, through imaginative literature, a medium which is false by definition (fiction, hyperbole, subjectivism), but which we nevertheless seem to look to, not least in the case of Dickens, as a source of, or at least a route towards, valuable and applicable truth. It is a timely reminder, too, of how extensive and diverse Dickens's reach continues to be, from austere literary theorists and scrupulous textual scholars, through a host of profoundly uncategorizable "general readers," to the likes of "PapaPolarBear" and "Chavstallion" (not to mention the unfortunate "Inselstricken"). Seeking, in our small way, for some reliability within this vertiginous environment, Dickens Quarterly will continue to be meticulous in evaluating sources and checking quotations. While Dickens's words may be chopped up and twisted around, all over the Internet, here they will continue to be drawn from standard editions. It is great news, therefore, that the first volume of the Oxford Dickens (long-awaited successor to the Clarendon) is scheduled for publication later this year: Paul Schlicke's edition of Sketches by Boz, which will soon be reviewed in these pages. Meanwhile, scholarly work on Dickens, including doctoral dissertations, continues to be formidable in both quality and quantity. This should be clear from the "Dickens Checklist" in this issue, which has been further swelled by a concerted effort to catch up on everything from 2019 that has not previously been reported. Future checklists are likely to revert to something more like the normal size, but we will try to be as comprehensive as possible. Meanwhile, the present list is quite revealing about which Dickensian...
Read full abstract