MLR, 104.1, 2009 217 her scope indicates theirlimitations; they were fineas faras they went.She goes further, and addswhat really mattersaboutHildegart,leavingitto researchers to takethings from there. Thisbook isa newstarting-point forreflection on thefigure of Hildegart. It is not easy towrite about an author who dies an untimely death. Her violentand shocking death is an overpowering elementinmostwritingon Hildegart(even Domingo's).Sinclair avoidsthis byassimilating Hildegart's brieflife intotheequally brief existence ofher mostprecious work,the'Ligapara la reforma sexual'-theSpanishbranch of the WorldLeague for SexualReform. Sex and SocietyinEarlyTwentieth-Century Spain isdividedintoeightchapters that go from the analysis of the Spanish case in relation to sexual modernism in Europe totheendofsexualreform and thereturn toconservative viewsstemming from Francoism in Spain and the end of the Second World War in the rest of the Continent. Sinclairaccurately reads Hildegart'sdeathand subsequent oblivion withinthecontext oftheendofeugenics, thefoundation ofHildegart'sidentity as a humanbeing. Withouteugenicideas, Hildegart wouldnothavebeenconceived. The movement, partofthe Europeanavant-garde, was radicalized andbecameespecially dangerous when itblendedwithNazism. Itdied, and so diedHildegart. When analysing Hildegart'slifeandworks,Sinclairdoes not forget thekey intellectual relationships thatinfluenced the youngfeminist, amongthemthecomplexrelation ship withMarafion, whomHildegartregarded as her 'maestro' (although shewas critical ofhimand therefore didnot lionize himeither). He neverreferred toher in hiswriting, beingoneof the manymale thinkers who suffered from amnesia when itcame to recognizing the workof theirfemale collaborators. Sinclairincludesa highly interesting appendixreproducing thecorrespondence written by Hildegartto HavelockEllis,thefather ofmodern sexology. The letters arepartofEllis'sarchive in theBritishLibraryand are a valuabledocumentforunderstanding thedaily existence, dedication, andpersonality ofthe childgeniusthat Hildegart was. Sinclair allowsthereadertoappreciate notonlyHildegartthethinker, an ardent believer in sexualreform and eugenicthought, but alsoHilde thechild,fatally bound to her mother, bothof them uncompromisingly committed totheir particular reading of theregenerationism that articulated Spanishcultural and intellectual lifeat the beginning ofthetwentieth century. This is a substantial and impeccable monograph. It does justice to a figurewho hashitherto beenonlypartially rescuedfrom oblivionandoften wrongly narrated, and itdeploys forus an intellectual world that isnot only Peninsular but also part of a European system of thoughtwith which Hildegart was keen to be in dialogue and out ofwhich she came to exist. UNIVERSITY OF EXETER NURIA CAPDEVILA-ARGUELLES Contandohistorias:lasprimeras novelasdeLourdes Ortiz. ByLYNN ANN McGo VERN. Madrid: Pliegos. 2004. 167 PP. ?15.20. ISBN 84-96045-26-9. Contandohistorias studies, as thetitle indicates, Luz de lamemoria(1976),Picadura mortal (1979),En dias comoestos(1981),Urraca (1982),andArcangeles(1986), 218 Reviews earlynovelsof thehighly acclaimednovelist LourdesOrtiz, allof them published duringthe yearsof the Spanishtransition todemocracy. Ortizhas thereputation of beinga solid writer. Shehas received wide attention frominternational Hispanism and from criticsingeneral. Lynn AnnMcGovern's interest inthis writeriscertainly basedon anappreciation of the profound richness ofOrtiz'sprose. McGovern favours a postmodern socio-cultural contextualization forthenovels inherstudy; sheconsiders that thisfits in with whathappenedinSpain inthose years andwithOrtiz's feminist dimension. Undoubtedly, theendof thedictatorship and thetransition todemocracy werehistorical events positively affecting the visibility of Spanish womenwriters, women'semancipation, the education ofgirls, andwomen's presenceinthe publicdomain. However,it wouldhavebeenbetter toeschew general statements devoidof specific reference suchas theassumptionthat'a traves de la inspiracion de autorasfemeninas, las mujereshanempezadoa recordar quienesson' (p. 14) or thebeliefthat, nowadays,'lasmujeres estain escribiendosobre mujeres comonunca se habiahecho' (p. 27).WhetherMcGovern is referring to thenew millennium or tothetransition that witnessedthe publication ofOrtiz's first books remains unexplained. Besides,Spanish womenwerenotan ignorant crowd waiting fora group of novelists to take them out of their ignorance and lack of consciousness of their identity. Itdoes notmake any sense to imply thatwomen did not know how to think and were confused until Franco died, and that they then started to look at themselves, reflected inthe mirrors offered tothem byanewgeneration ofnovelists. McGovernmentionstheexclusionfromthecanon suffered by female novelists, a factrepeatedly deploredby criticsand academics. However,theauthorherself repeats the same mistake, as she recalls Spanish male writers going into exile at the beginning of thedictatorship, presenting themaspartofhercritical overview, and forgets aboutawholegeneration offeminists writing prolifically about 'el problema de lamujer' and 'elproblema de Espafia'. There were great works to be read from a feminist perspective well before Laforet and Martin Gaite. Not taking this into account whenanalysing female-authored fiction after Franco,and instead assuming that female authorship begins in 1975, has been detrimental to the study of novels by women writers starting to publish after the death of the dictator and to the feminist cause ingeneral. Reference tocrucialscholarship ongenderisalsomissing inthis monograph. Nevertheless, theauthorisveryfamiliar withpostmodernism, Hutcheoninparticular, andappliesitefficiently toliterary analysis. Unfortunately...
Read full abstract