T he US Department of the Interior (USDI) Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has recently begun to develop new resource management plans (RMPs) for western Oregon. In doing so, the BLM has specifically sought out a range of viewpoints and suggestions on new and innovative approaches to the management of their timberlands in western Oregon. One aspect of management being considered is the ecological forestry approach of Franklin and Johnson (this volume). The Pilot Joe Project, planned in 2011 and implemented in 2012, was designed under the conceptual framework of Franklin and Johnson’s Dry Forest restoration strategy. This demonstration project integrates ecosystem restoration, conservation of northern spotted owl (NSO) habitat, and commodity production over portions of the Middle Applegate watershed, an 80,000-ac landscape that is approximately 62% under control of USDI BLM. The rugged Middle Applegate landscape has cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. Annual precipitation is 25–35 in. (varying with elevation), with less than 10% occurring from June through September. Because of these moisture limitations, slight changes in aspect and soil type dramatically affect forest productivity—cooler, moister north-facing slopes are typically covered by dense coniferous forest, while hot, dry south-facing slopes are usually dominated by hardwoods, shrubs, and grass. In the past, fire was the major disturbance agent affecting these plant communities. Alteration of historic fire regimes has allowed the proportion of Douglas-fir and dense closed-canopy forests to significantly increase, threatening old trees and increasing the possibility of crown fire. Hence, specific goals of this project included increasing the resistance and resilience of forests to wildfire, drought, and insects by reducing stand densities and ladder fuels; shifting species composition from the current dominance of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) to include more ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana), California black oak (Quercus kelloggii), and Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii); and conserving and improving the survivability of older trees (more than 150 years). The Pilot Joe Project is the first “learning” and demonstration phase of a multiyear effort by BLM to apply the Franklin–Johnson approach within the Middle Applegate watershed. Fundamental to the success of this project was the ability to move forward on the treatments in a timely fashion. The relatively small size (890 ac) of Pilot Joe allowed it to be implemented more rapidly than a larger project that would take several years to plan and deploy—it was brought from public scoping to a sold timber sale in 8 months. Building stakeholder confidence was also needed to facilitate the process, so transparency was key—the BLM created and maintains a website for the Middle Applegate to post all meeting notes, official reports, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 documents, and other related material for rapid, easy access to any interested party. Public participation was also critical to its success—extensive involvement occurred during the planning and development of Pilot Joe. More than a dozen field trips and public meetings were held to discuss, evaluate, and prioritize sites and conditions for treatment (Figure 1). Two in-depth meetings were held with the general public to specifically discuss the pilot goals and solicit criteria to be used for selection of forest stands to show the Franklin–Johnson restoration approach. Majority support existed for prioritizing treatment units most at risk to loss from wildfire, insects, or disease, especially those stands that could be accessed via the existing road network. Although there was general support for restoration forestry, there were many concerns. For example, some participants were very concerned about new road construction and skeptical that commercial harvest could be done while protecting residual stand characteristics such as large oak trees. Others felt restoration forestry does not provide high enough economic return. Developing partnerships outside of the agencies helped considerably. In the case of the Pilot Joe Project, the AppleJ. For. 110(8):442–445 http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.12-081 Copyright © 2012 Society of American Foresters