Smaller Aortic Diameter Research Articles

Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression in Men with small Infrarenal Aortic Diameters at Screening.

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm defined as an infrarenal aortic diameter ≥30 mm reduces mortality, but managing patients with diameters of 25-29 mm is debated. Incorporating body surface area into diagnostic criteria may improve identification of those at risk of developing treatment-requiring aneurysms in this group. In a previous study, we defined a relative abdominal aortic aneurysm as an infrarenal aortic diameter ≥150% larger than expected, with the normal diameter calculated using body surface area as a scaling factor. This study aimed to determine if this criterion could identify those at risk of aneurysmal development among patients with aortic diameter of 25-29 mm at screening. A cohort study was conducted on men with abdominal aortic diameters of 25-29 mm at AAA screening in Malmö, Sweden, with a median follow-up of 9.9 years. Growth rates were compared between the relative aneurysm group and the non-relative aneurysm group using a linear mixed-effects model to account for both fixed and random effects. Time and hazard ratio to reach 40 mm, a marker of significant aneurysmal progression, were assessed using a log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model, both adjusted for smoking status and diabetes. In a cohort of 270 men, three developed abdominal aortic aneurysms ≥55 mm. Baseline growth rate was 0.1 mm/year (95% CI: 0.0-0.3). Growth rates were increased by 0.4 mm/year (95% CI: 0.0-0.7) in the relative aneurysm group, and by 0.4 mm/year (95% CI: 0.2-0.7) in smokers. Median time to reach IAD ≥40 mm was 11.5 years for relative aneurysms, and was not reached for those without, with a significant difference shown by a log-rank test stratified for smoking (p=.009). Hazards ratio to reach IAD ≥40 mm for relative aneurysms was 2.77 (95% CI: 1.34-5.74, p=.006) compared to those without. In men with diameters of 25-29 mm at screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, the use of an individualised diagnostic criterion, based on height and weight, could identify those with increased aneurysm growth and a significantly shorter time to reach 40 mm compared to baseline. The relative aortic diameter, beyond the absolute diameter, appeared important for aneurysmal development. However, the differences were likely too small to warrant changes in clinical practice, highlighting the need for further research to establish clinical relevance.

Abstract 4148073: Expect the Unexpected: Type A Aortic Dissection in Pregnant Patient with Marfan Syndrome

Case Description: A 26 yo woman with Marfan Syndrome (MFS, FBN1 ), ectopia lentis, aortic dilation and no family history of MFS or aortic dissection was evaluated for preconception counseling. She was asymptomatic, and the size of her aortic root (~4cm) and ascending aorta (~3.5cm) had been stable for over 5 years. She was counseled that risk of cardiac events during her pregnancy is high, but lower compared to those with aortic sizes >4.5cm. Once pregnant, she was followed closely with imaging every trimester (MRA at 25 weeks gestation showed stable aortic sizes). Cardio-obstetric recommendations included: CARPREG II score: 2, mWHO class: III, consideration of assisted second stage due to aortic root dilation. She was counseled on symptoms of aortic dissection and to seek emergency care should those symptoms arise. At 27 weeks gestation, she presented to the ED with intense chest and neck pain, shortness of breath, and headache. Emergent CT showed aortic root (4.1cm) and proximal ascending aortic dissection with propagation into the left main coronary artery (Figure 1). She underwent emergent C-section followed by aortic root and ascending aorta replacement and mechanical aortic valve replacement due to severe regurgitation. She was discharged in stable condition 8 days after an uncomplicated post-operative recovery. Her baby is recovering in the NICU. Discussion: While risk of aortic dissection in women with MFS is higher during pregnancy, recent studies suggest relative safety with aortic root diameters up to 4.5cm. Our case highlights that even at “lower risk” aortic sizes, aortic dissection remains an important risk for such women. Educating patients and providers about the acute symptoms of aortic dissection and forming an action plan for timely intervention can be lifesaving. Furthermore, some genetic mutations (e.g. TGBR1/2 or SMAD3 ) and sequence variants within the FBN1 gene may pose a higher risk of aortic dissection at smaller aortic diameters. Our patient’s pathogenic FBN1 mutation (-c.2114-5T>G, previously classified as a VUS) highlights the importance of genetic testing: prophylactic surgery at sizes <4.5cm may be considered with high-risk genetic variants or a family history of aortic dissection.

Women Experience Higher Rates of Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

ObjectivesThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and complex endovascular thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair (cEVAR) has been increasingly adopted in the treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta aneurysms, offering a less invasive approach for patients with appropriate anatomy. Women usually present with smaller aortic diameter. However, they usually have greater aneurysm growth rates. How sex can affect postoperative and short-term outcomes after TEVAR is not well reported. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes in female versus male patients undergoing TEVAR for treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a Medicare-linked database. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing TEVAR for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION) database from 2003 to 2018. Patients were divided into males and females. Patients presented with ruptured aneurysm were excluded from the analysis. Postoperative outcomes included in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia, and 30-day mortality. One-year outcomes included mortality, aneurysmal rupture, and reintervention. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis and one-year outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan Meier Survival and Cox regression analyses. ResultsA total of 3,058 males and 1,843 females were available for the analysis. Female patients had smaller median aortic diameter, were more likely to be black, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease, and to be symptomatic on presentation. Male patients were more likely to be on preoperative medications such as aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, P2Y12 antagonists, and anticoagulants. After adjusting for potential confounders, female gender was associated with double the risk of in-hospital stroke (OR: 2.3, 95%CI ((1.5-3.7), P<0.001) and 80% increase in 30-day mortality (OR: 1.8, 95%CI (1.3-2.6), P=0.001). At one year, female gender was associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR: 1.2, 95%CI (1.05-1.4), P=0.011). There was a trend towards higher risk of reintervention (HR: 1.2, 95%CI (0.97-1.6), P=0.079). ConclusionsMortality after TEVAR seems to be higher in female patients at 30 days and up to one year of follow-up. Female patients also face a two times higher risk of in-hospital stroke. Future studies with a larger female population should aim to identify and potentially ameliorate the factors associated with these unfavorable outcomes in females.

Hereditary Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections: Clinical Diagnosis and Genetic Testing

Hereditary aortic aneurysms and dissections, such as Marfan syndrome, differ in that they occur in younger patients without generally recognized risk factors, have a predilection for the thoracic rather than the abdominal aorta, and are at risk for dissection even at smaller aortic diameters. Early diagnosis, careful follow-up, and early intervention, such as medication to reduce aortic root growth and prophylactic aortic replacement to prevent fatal aortic dissection, are essential for a better prognosis. Molecular genetic testing is extremely useful for early diagnosis. However, in actual clinical practice, the question often arises as to when and to which patient genetic testing should be offered since the outcome of the tests can have important implications for the patient and the relatives. Pre- and post-test genetic counseling is essential for early intervention to be effective. (This article is a secondary translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2023; 32: 261-267.).

The Semibranch: A New Tool for Complex Aortic Pathologies.

To describe the semibranch as new tool to treat patients with thoracoabdominal, para- and juxtarenal aortic pathologies. The technique is demonstrated in 2 patients with aortic pathologies. First, a 76-year-old woman with a type Ia endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aneurysm (EVAR). Due to the short mainbody of the EVAR and suprarenal extension of the pathology, a 4-branched device with integrated bifurcation was chosen. To realize a branched device in small diameters of the suprarenal aorta, 2 semibranches, for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the celiac trunc (CT), were planned. The second patient, a 75-year-old man, had a juxtarenal aneurysm. Due to small diameters of the aorta, semibranches for the SMA and the CT were planned. In both cases, a total transfemoral approach was used with a steerable sheath. Placement, cannulation of the semibranch, forwarding of the bridging stentgraft, and sealing was uneventful. All 4 semibranches were successful in sealing the aneurysm. The semibranch is another tool in the armamentarium of the endovascular interventionalist, which can expand the range of patients that can be treated. Especially patients with small aortic diameter or short distances between target vessels with the same offspring angle can profit from the semibranch design. The semibranch is a new tool to treat thoracoabdominal as well para- and juxtarenal aortic pathologies. Due to its reduced length, packaging density can be higher and diameter of the stentgraft can be larger. It closes the gap in pathologies where fenestration are not suitable (kinked aortas) and there is not enough space for standard inner branches (small diameters).

Impaired Aortic Growth in Neuroblastoma Patients After Intensive Treatment

PurposeThis study evaluated the abdominal aortic diameter in high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients and the risk of aortic narrowing following intensive treatment. MethodsWe measured the aortic diameter at four specific levels of the abdominal aorta (diaphragmatic crus, celiac axis, and the root of the superior (SMA) and inferior (IMA) mesenteric arteries) on contrast CT scans. The control group consisted of 56 children with non-oncologic disorders, while the NB group included 35 patients with high-risk abdominal NB. We used regression analysis of age and aortic diameter to determine the regression formula for each level in each group and performed intergroup comparisons using t-test. ResultsWe evaluated a total of 160 contrast-enhanced CTs performed in the 35 eligible cases. The aortic diameter of pretreated NB patients was not significantly different from the controls. After receiving any treatment, the aortic diameter was significantly smaller in the NB group (p < 0.01 each). Patients who underwent radical surgery, particularly gross total resection (n = 26), had smaller aortic diameters at all levels compared to controls (p < 0.01 each). Patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) had smaller aortic diameters than controls. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) patients (n = 24) had smaller aortic diameters at all levels except the celiac axis (crus, SMA, IMA; p < 0.01 each), and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) ± EBRT patients (n = 5) had smaller aortic diameters at all levels (p < 0.01 each). ConclusionPatients with NB may experience impaired development of the abdominal aorta after multimodal therapy, particularly after RT. Close observation and long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for catastrophic vascular complications. Level of EvidenceLEVEL III.

Surgical Treatment for Branched Endograft Thrombosis of the Abdominal Aorta

Introduction. Endovascular intervention was firstly introduced for repairing aortic aneurysms in the early 1990s. The greatest advantage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is its minimally-invasive character, thus implying shorter post-operative period. The operative mortality rate comprises 3.3 % (95 % CI 2.9–3.6); however, according to recent studies, the rate has declined to 1.4 % due to a rapid improvement in outcomes. According to the DREAM-trial, the incidence of a branched endograft thrombosis accounts for 6.4% within the first 30 days. The EVAR trial reports an incidence of 2.6% after the first year of follow-up. Stent bending and small distal aortic diameters (less than 20 mm) are believed to be the most common causes of endograft thrombosis.Aim. To identify the causes of complications following the abdominal aortic stent-graft repair and to determine the optimal treatment strategy.Materials and methods. The paper presents a case of 71-year-old patient with late complication after endovascular abdominal aortic repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The patient was admitted to the hospital on January 05, 2020 as an emergency due to the pain in the left lower limb. On December 03, 2019 the patient underwent endovascular abdominal aortic repair. Angiography of January 06, 2020 revealed thrombosis of the left branch of the stent graft. Thrombectomy of the brunched left stent graft, left iliac artery and balloon dilatation of the brunched left stent-graft were performed.Results and discussion. Endovascular abdominal aortic repair stands as the first choice for patients with appropriate aortic anatomy and those with significant comorbidity. Despite the significant progress in endovascular abdominal aortic repairing, the EVAR procedure is followed by a nearly fivefold increase in the 30-day reintervention rate as compared to open surgery which comprises 9.8 % according to the EVAR-I, and 18 %, according to the EVAR-II trials.Conclusion. Our multidisciplinary team consisted of vascular and endovascular surgeons managed to perform hybrid surgery, thus eliminating the EVAR-associated complication together with its cause.

AORTIC INVOLVEMENT IN FIBROMUSCULAR DYSPLASIA: REPORT FROM ARCADIA-POL

Objective: Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) affects the walls of medium-sized arteries. There are no described radiological characteristics pathognomonic of aortic FMD but pathological documentation of aortic FMD has been occasionally reported. The aims of this study were to investigate the characteristics of abdominal aorta in patients with FMD versus controls and to review the relevant literature. Design and method: We measured centreline abdominal aortic diameters on 136 patients with FMD (22 with focal disease) enrolled in the ARCADIA-POL study, 60 patients with carotid dissections but no evidence of FMD and 136 healthy controls. Results: The median abdominal aortic diameter did not differ between patients with FMD, patients with carotid dissections and no evidence of FMD and healthy controls. However, aortic diameter at the level of the diaphragm was smaller in patients with focal FMD compared to patients with multifocal FMD, patients with carotid dissections and healthy controls (ANOVA 0.015). Six patients with mid-aortic syndrome (MAS) were reported separately. All had radiological evidence of FMD in medium-sized aortic branches. In one in whom a sample of aortic wall was obtained, histology confirmed focal aortic FMD. A literature review found a further 31 reports of aortic histology with features of FMD. Conclusions: We found no difference in aortic diameters between individuals with or without FMD. Nevertheless, patients with focal FMD had smaller aortic diameters than those with multifocal FMD and controls. This represents another phenotypic difference between multifocal and focal FMD. Focal renal artery stenosis associated with MAS may represent an extreme presentation belonging to the same disease spectrum.

Midterm outcomes of isolated thoracic aortic replacement in congenital versus degenerative aortopathy in a 15-year institutional cohort.

Open aortic replacement represents the only approved option to address thoracic aortopathy among patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD). The aim of our study was to investigate contemporary midterm outcomes of isolated thoracic aortic replacement in patients with CTD versus degenerative pathology in a large institutional cohort. All patients undergoing isolated open thoracic aortic replacement at a single academic center from 2005 to 2020 were included. Patients were classified as having CTD or not having CTD based on documented genetic mutations associated with congenital aortopathy. In-hospital and midterm outcomes, including mortality, paraplegia, development of new arterial pathology on surveillance imaging, and the need for future operations, were compared between groups using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Overall, 62 patients were included with a median follow-up of 58months (range, 19-81months) (59months for those with CTD vs 51.5months for those without CTD). CTD was present in 18 patients (29%), with 16 having Marfan syndrome (77.8%). Patients with CTD were younger than patients without CTD (45.8years vs 60.9years) and had lower rates of smoking (5.6% vs 56.8%) and hypertension (97.7% vs 72.2%; all P< .01). Patients with CTD were more likely to have a dissection component at the time of repair compared with patients without CTD (100% vs 59.1%) and underwent repair at smaller aortic diameters (5.9cm vs 6.6cm; both P< .05). There were no differences in in-hospital outcomes between the two groups, including mortality (4.5% vs 5.6%) and paraplegia (2.3% vs 0%; both P > .05). At 5years, patients with CTD were more likely to have developed aneurysmal changes distal to their thoracic repair (88.9% vs 47.7%) and extra-aortic arterial aneurysms (41.2% vs 2.3%; both P< .05). However, on survival analysis, there were no differences in freedom from additional vascular procedures (hazard ratio,1.76; P= .333) or, specifically, additional aortic procedures (hazard ratio, 1.81; P= .380) between the two groups. There was only one anastomotic complication identified on longitudinal follow-up, which occurred in a patient without CTD 8years after the index operation. Although carrying significant operative risks and the potential for morbidity, open thoracic aortic replacement represents a well-tolerated, durable treatment option for patients with congenitally mediated thoracic aortic disease. Because both patients with and without CTD who required thoracic aortic replacement often need future aortic intervention, vigilant surveillance is warranted. Equivalent intervention rates between the two groups suggest remodeling of the CTD aorta is almost universally characterized by initial postrepair dilation, but the majority of these changes successfully stabilize and do not progress to higher rates of intervention.

Hypogastric Artery Salvage Associated with Decreased Postoperative Cardiac and Renal Complications

Hypogastric Artery Salvage Associated with Decreased Postoperative Cardiac and Renal Complications

One Year on: Test Your Knowledge From July 2021

1. A retrospective analysis of three studies (the Multi-centre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS), the 2013/14 cohort of the English NHS AAA Screening Programme (NAAASP) and the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) offspring cohort) of male participants screened for aortic aneurysm disease investigated the association between infra-renal aortic diameter and cardiovascular risk. According to the results of these studies, which of the following is correct? 1A)A small aortic diameter was a uniform risk factor for cardiovascular events across the three studies.B)Cardiovascular mortality in all studies was higher in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) compared to those without.C)Aortic diameter was risk factor for cardiovascular events, but this association was not confirmed on multivariable analysis.D)Aortic diameter was risk factor for stroke.E)None of the above.

Women Experience Higher Rates of Mortality Following Thoracic and Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Thoracic and complex endovascular aortic repair (TCEVAR) has been increasingly adopted in the treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta aneurysms, offering a less-invasive approach for patients with the appropriate anatomy. Women usually present with a smaller aortic diameter. However, they also usually have greater aneurysm growth rates. How sex can affect the postoperative and short-term outcomes after TCEVAR has not been well reported. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes for female and male patients undergoing TCEVAR for the treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a Medicare-linked database.

Computed tomography predictors of structural valve degeneration in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable prostheses.

Computed tomography (CT) provides excellent anatomy assessment of the aortic annulus (AoA) and is utilized for pre-procedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to investigate if geometrical characteristics of the AoA determined by CT may represent predictors of structural valve degeneration (SVD) in patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves. This is a retrospective study on 124 consecutive patients (mean age: 79 ± 7 years; female: 61%) undergoing balloon-expandable TAVI prospectively enrolled in a registry. AoA maximum diameter (Dmax), minimum diameter (Dmin), and area were assessed using pre-procedural CT. SVD was identified during follow-up with transthoracic echocardiography documenting structural prosthetic valve abnormalities with or without hemodynamic changes. The mean follow-up was 5.9 ± 1.7 years. SVD was found in 48 out of 124 patients (38%). AoA Dmax, Dmin, and area were significantly smaller in patients with SVD compared to patients without SVD (25.6 ± 2.2 mm vs. 27.1 ± 2.8 mm, p = 0.012; 20.5 ± 2.1 mm vs. 21.8 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.001 and 419 ± 77 mm2 vs. 467 ± 88 mm2, p = 0.002, respectively). At univariable analysis, female sex, BSA, 23-mm prosthetic valve size, Dmax < 27.1 mm, and a Dmin < 19.9 mm were associated with SVD, whereas at multivariable analysis, only Dmin < 19.9 mm (OR = 2.873, 95% CI: 1.191-6.929, p = 0.019) and female sex (OR = 2.659, 95% CI: 1.095-6.458, p = 0.031) were independent predictors of SVD. Female sex and AoA Dmin < 19.9 mm are associated with SVD in patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves. When implanting large prostheses in order to avoid paraprosthetic regurgitation, caution should be observed due to the risk of excessive stretching of the AoA Dmin, which may play a role in SVD. • Long-term durability is a concern for transcatheter aortic valve bioprosthesis. • CT provides an excellent assessment of the aortic annulus's geometrical characteristics for prosthesis sizing before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). • Female sex and a small minimum aortic annulus diameter measured with CT are independent predictors of structural valve degeneration in patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves.

Endovascular treatment of traumatic aortic rupture using iliac extension stent-grafts in patients with small aortic diameters.

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in young patients sustaining traumatic blunt aortic injury (BAI) using iliac extension stent-grafts because of small aortic diameters measuring <24 mm.METHODSRetrospective analysis regarding clinical presentation, trauma management, endovascular techniques and outcome of patients with a small descending aorta involving an iliac extension stent-graft to treat traumatic BAI.RESULTSAmong 48 patients who suffered a BAI and underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 7 received iliac extension stent-grafts. They were 27.4/[standard deviation (SD): −13.1] years old and 6 out of 7 were male. The iliac extension stent-graft was used as distal stent-graft, and a thoracic stent-graft was used in most patients as proximal extension. We achieved overall technical success in all patients during a procedure lasting 92.6 (SD: 54.9) min. One patient died 2 days after the endovascular procedure of hypoxic brain injury, and another died after 17 days of liver failure. That patient had also suffered a spinal cord injury following the procedure, as the stent-graft had been deployed in Ishimaru Zone 2, and the carotid to subclavian bypass had to be omitted because of his critical condition. Control computed tomographic angiographs was available in 6 patients after 7.7 (SD: 5.1) days and showed no endoleak. The surviving patients were discharged after 18.4 (SD: 13.4) days.CONCLUSIONSTreating traumatic BAI using iliac extension stent-grafts in young patients with small aortic diameters is feasible. We observed no mortality caused by the BAI or related to endovascular therapy within this small patient cohort.

Female gender is associated with increased late luminal narrowing within the stent graft after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Luminal narrowing, suspected secondary to thrombus, occurs within stent grafts at an unclear incidence after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The significance of this phenomenon has not been determined, nor have the risk factors for development of intragraft luminal narrowing. Small graft diameter is hypothesized to be a risk factor for the development of ingraft stenosis. A retrospective analysis was performed of a multicenter healthcare system including all patients who underwent TEVAR between July 2011 and July 2019 with at least 1year of subsequently available surveillance contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging. Standard demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected. Measurements were obtained via direct off-line images from computed tomography scans. Patent intragraft diameters were compared with baseline and interval change values were normalized to time to follow-up. The primary outcome measure was annual rate of intragraft luminal narrowing. There were 208 patients who met the inclusion criteria (94 women, 114 men) with a median follow-up of 822days. The mean annual rate of percent intragraft diameter reduction was 10.5± 7.7% for women and 7.6± 5.6% for men (P= .0026). Multivariate analysis demonstrated female gender (P= .0283), preoperative diagnosis of hypertension (P= .0449), and need for coverage of the left subclavian artery (P= .0328) were all significant predictors of intragraft luminal narrowing. Small aortic diameters were not found to be associated independently with ingraft luminal narrowing nor was the concomitant use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications. Significant amounts of ingraft luminal narrowing, defined as a greater than 20% intragraft diameter decrease, were associated with an increased need for any reintervention, including for malperfusion, endoleak, and symptomatic aneurysm (P= .0249). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a significant gender-associated difference in high rates of intragraft luminal narrowing (P=.00189). In this analysis, female gender is shown to be a significant nonmodifiable risk factor for intragraft luminal narrowing after TEVAR. The development of this phenomenon is not benign; as such, these findings were associated with an increased need for reintervention. This finding may be attributable to differences in aortic compliance or gender-associated differences in coagulation pathways and merits further investigation. Surveillance after thoracic stent grafting must account for patient-specific variations in complication risk.

Sex Specific Diameter and Aortic Size Index Threshold for Patients Undergoing Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Introduction: Women are more likely to present for repair of a ruptured aortic aneurysm, have a smaller aortic diameter at the time of repair, and experience worse peri-operative outcomes. The aortic size index (ASI), which indexes the aortic diameter to body surface area, has been proposed as a more sensitive measure to determine the threshold for repair. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of ASI and aortic diameter on rupture rates and peri-operative outcomes following aneurysm repair in female patients.

Open repair versus thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treating traumatic aortic injury

Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is rare and fatal. Treatment has evolved with advances in imaging and the emergence of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This study reports a single-center, 5-year experience of TEVAR and open repair for BTAI. Patients with BTAI treated at a level I trauma center from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed with patient charts and successive computed tomography angiography images. Patients were grouped according to treatment modality: open repair, TEVAR, or medical management, chosen based on patients' characteristics and injury severity. Groups were compared in terms of preoperative demographics, injury characteristics, operative variables, short-term, and long-term outcomes. Forty-two patients were included in the study: 16 (38%) underwent open repair, 17 (40.4%) underwent TEVAR, seven (16.6%) were managed medically, and two (4.7%) died during triage. The median age was 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38-57.5 years), and 92.5% were male; the median Injury Severity Score was 33 (IQR, 29-41). Overall mortality was 7.5%. The median hospital stay was 33 days (IQR, 19.5-58.5). Patients undergoing open repair were significantly younger (43 vs. 55 years; p=0.002) and had a smaller aortic diameter (22.3 vs. 24.0mm; p=<0.001) than those undergoing TEVAR. No BTAI-related late mortality or reintervention was observed during follow-ups. This study demonstrated excellent outcomes with multidisciplinary team efforts and appropriate application of treatment modality. TEVAR is ideal for older or severely injured patients; open repair is an important alternative for young patients or patients with unsuitable aortic anatomy.

Abstract 11265: Sex-Specific Response to Endothelin-1 Overexpression Mediates Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Development

Introduction: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are common diseases associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although TAAs are more common in men, women have worse outcomes and dissect at smaller aortic diameters. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is the most potent vasoconstrictor in humans, and an important mediator of vascular stiffness and tone. ET-1 levels are increased in patients with TAA, and genetic variants that affect ET-1 production and receptor expression are associated with vascular diseases. Though ET-1 levels do not differ between men and women with TAA, it is unknown if response to ET-1 mediates sex-specific differences. Hypothesis: ET-1 has different effects on vascular stiffness and aortic dissection risk in men and women. Methods: Angiotensin-II (AngII) was delivered subcutaneously at 1 ug/kg/min dose and rate using osmotic pumps for 28 days in endothelial cell-specific ET-1 transgenic (eET-1) and matched WT control mice. We measured blood pressure, aortic stiffness, and aortic size at the end of the study. Results: We observed marked sex-specific ET-1 effects on TAA. Despite elevated blood pressure in all animals that received AngII (Fig1A), we observed increased aortic stiffness in male eET-1 mice (+1.5 m/s eET-1 vs. +0.74 m/s WT) but decreased aortic stiffness in female eET-1 mice (-1.9 m/s eET-1 vs. +0.69 m/s WT), measured by pulse wave velocity (Fig1B). Consistent with these results, aortic diameter was only increased in male eET-1 mice (+0.61 mm eET-1 vs. +0.11 mm WT) but not in female eET-1 mice (+0.06 mm eET-1 vs. +0.11 mm WT) (Fig1C). Significantly, 2 of 3 male eET-1 animals died before 28 days from dissected TAAs, whereas all females survived the length of the study. Conclusions: In the AngII-TAA model, there is a sex dimorphic effect of ET-1 overexpression. Male mice have greater vascular stiffness and develop TAA in response to the same level of ET-1 as in matched female mice. This difference may explain the increased incidence of TAA in men.

Significance of Hemodynamics Biomarkers, Tissue Biomechanics and Numerical Simulations in the Pathogenesis of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

Guidelines for the treatment of aortic wall diseases are based on measurements of maximum aortic diameter. However, aortic rupture or dissections do occur for small aortic diameters. Growing scientific evidence underlines the importance of biomechanics and hemodynamics in aortic disease development and progression. Wall shear stress (WWS) is an important hemodynamics marker that depends on aortic wall morphology and on the aortic valve function. WSS could be helpful to interpret aortic wall remodeling and define personalized risk criteria. The complementarity of Computational Fluid Dynamics and 4D Magnetic Resonance Imaging as tools for WSS assessment is a promising reality. The potentiality of these innovative technologies will provide maps or atlases of hemodynamics biomarkers to predict aortic tissue dysfunction. Ongoing efforts should focus on the correlation between these non-invasive imaging biomarkers and clinico-pathologic situations for the implementation of personalized medicine in current clinical practice.

Reflected wave intensity increases based on aortic diameter after endovascular aortic therapy in a goat model

Reflected wave increases after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in patients with aortic aneurysm. This affects the left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and leads to a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between increased reflected wave amplitude and aortic diameter after EVAR. EVAR was performed in seven healthy goats. We assessed wave intensity (WI), aortic diameter, and stiffness parameter β. Moreover, we evaluated the relationship between negative reflected wave (NW, reflected waves toward the heart from the periphery by WI) and other parameters after EVAR. Results showed an increase in stiffness parameter β (3.5 ± 0.3 vs 15.9 ± 4.7, p = 0.018) and a decrease in the change of aortic diameter (6.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.7 ± 0.4%, p = 0.018) after EVAR. The NW was significantly amplified after EVAR from baseline (−589.8 ± 143.4 to − 1192.3 ± 303.7 mmHg-m/sec3, p = 0.043). The NW showed a significant correlation with maximum aortic diameter (R = 0.707, p = 0.038) and minimum aortic diameter (R = 0.724, p = 0.033). The reflected wave was enhanced after EVAR and was correlated to the aortic diameter at the stent-graft site. It is important to consider that patients with smaller aortic diameters in landing zone who undergo EVAR may develop LV dysfunction.