HomeCirculation ResearchVol. 126, No. 12In This Issue Free AccessIn BriefPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessIn BriefPDF/EPUBIn This Issue Ruth Williams Ruth WilliamsRuth Williams Search for more papers by this author Originally published4 Jun 2020https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000397Circulation Research. 2020;126:1667is related toAssociation of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19ACEI/ARB on COVID-19 in Patients With Hypertension (p 1671)Hypertensive patients taking ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II blockers should continue such treatments if infected with coronavirus, say Zhang et al.Download figureDownload PowerPointPatients with hypertension have an increased risk of death from COVID-19. While the high blood pressure itself is likely to blame, concerns have been raised that medications used to treat hypertension—specifically ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB)—may worsen coronavirus infection. Research in animals showed these drugs increased expression of ACE2—the protein on lung cells used by the virus to gain entry. Conflicting evidence showed these drugs might reduce lung injury in pneumonia patients, however. To weigh up the benefits and risks of ACEI/ARB use, Zhang and colleagues performed a retrospective analysis of 1128 patients with COVID-19 and hypertension who were treated at nine hospitals in Hubei province, China. Of the patients, 188 took ACEI/ARB during their hospital stay and 940 did not. The ages, sexes, and comorbidities in the two groups were similar. After 28 days of follow up, 99 of the patients had died—7 from the group taking ACEI/ARB (3.7%) and 92 from the group that did not (9.8%). The team concludes that treatment of hypertension patients with ACEI/ARB does not increase risk of COVID-19 mortality and may even reduce the threat.ERR Signaling and Cardiac Maturation (p 1685)ERR is a maturation switch controlling heart cell development, say Sakamoto et al.Download figureDownload PowerPointFrom fetal to postnatal development, the human heart goes through significant changes including an expansion of mitochondrial numbers, a change in fuel utilization, replacement of fetal contractile proteins with adult ones, and increases in ion uptake and release. The transcription factor ERR was known to drive postnatal mitochondria biogenesis. Now Sakamoto and colleagues show it drives these other developmental changes, too. They developed a genetic method to knockdown expression of ERR in early postnatal mice and, when the animals were 5 weeks old, analyzed their transcriptomes. In the mice lacking ERR, there was a reduction in expression of genes involved in ion channeling and handling, fatty acid oxidation (the major metabolic process of the adult heart) as well as adult versions of contractile proteins compared with that seen in control animals. By contrast, expression of genes encoding fetal contractile proteins and factors involved in glycolysis—the metabolic pathway characteristic of fetal hearts—was upregulated. In heart failure, cardiomyocytes can revert to fetal-like cells. The authors, therefore, suggest that boosting ERR might be a way to counteract such pathology as well as a way to induce and study cardiomyocyte maturation in cultured progenitor cells.CIRP Governs the Heart Rate Response to Stress (p 1706)Xie et al discover a factor that keeps heart rate under control during stress.Download figureDownload PowerPointDuring the acute stress response (also known as fight-or-flight), heart rate increases rapidly due to the effect of adrenergic signaling on the cells of the sinoatrial node (SAN)—the heart’s pacemaker. Within SAN cells, levels of the signaling factor cAMP ramp up, which in turn increases the cells’ calcium handling and firing rates. But, a racing heartbeat can be damaging if excessive or prolonged, so what keeps the system in check? Xie and colleagues now show that cold-induced RNA-binding protein (CIRP) puts the brakes on by limiting cAMP levels. In rats that lack CIRP, the team showed, adrenergic signaling (treatment with isoproterenol) caused hearts to beat faster for longer than it did in wild-type animals, while basal rates were comparable. Cardiac tissue from the CIRP-lacking animals showed higher-than-usual levels of cAMP after isoproterenol treatment, and this was due to lower-than-usual levels of phosphodiesterase (PDE), the enzyme that normally degrades cAMP. The team went on to show that CIRP normally binds and stabilizes PDE messenger RNA ensuring a ready supply of the enzyme to restrain cAMP signaling. As well as revealing this crucial control mechanism, the work highlights CIRP as a potential new target for future heart-rate–lowering medications, the authors say. Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesAssociation of Inpatient Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers With Mortality Among Patients With Hypertension Hospitalized With COVID-19Peng Zhang, et al. Circulation Research. 2020;126:1671-1681 June 5, 2020Vol 126, Issue 12 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2020 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000397 Originally publishedJune 4, 2020 PDF download Advertisement
Read full abstract