This paper analyses the seismic vulnerability of various rammed earth medieval fortifications situated in Southeastern Spain, where seismic events with intensity over VII have taken place in the last millennium, using the vulnerability index method. This method begins with the choice of a certain initial value, V0, of the vulnerability index, which is obtained from a preset range between maximum, $${\text{V}}_{0}^{ {\rm max} }$$ , and minimum, $${\text{V}}_{0}^{ {\rm min} }$$ , values, which are likely for vulnerability indices, according to the constructive material characteristics and based on expert judgments. Rammed earth structures have not yet been studied using the vulnerability index method, despite the fact that they are quite common medieval structures in Spain and other countries in the Mediterranean region, many of which are also heritage sites, and hence are legally protected. Intervention priorities on them have been determined from the results in this paper with the aim of reducing their seismic vulnerability. For the different rammed earth techniques, a proposed primary value Vp = 0.76 together with some other material modifiers (construction typology and quality, current material porosity and density, and superficial deterioration) make the range of values V0 vary between 0.58 and 1.02. Moreover, structural behavior modifiers (MK) have been adapted to the various defensive rammed earth structural typologies used for these fortifications allowing us to obtain individualized vulnerability index values. Three rammed earth fortifications damaged by historical earthquakes and located in SE Spain have been used to validate the method, in which values of V0med range between 35.2 and 89.1% and upwards and the vulnerability index IVmed may vary between 27.9 and 70.7% and upwards as compared to those used by other authors for castles. Besides, the proposed method has been used by carefully choosing six rammed earth fortifications (two towers, two walls and two castles) in SE Spain which are representative of different construction systems, structural typologies and topographies. Furthermore, the mean damage grade and the probability of its occurrence is determined for each fortification based on PGA data and site effects, taking into account a probabilistic seismic scenario for a 975 year return period, in accordance with existing legislation. In the end, direct relations are established between the seismic vulnerability and the types of material and the typology of the fortifications. We have carried out a sensibility analysis in order to learn about the influence of the constructive technique, the material condition and the structural typology on the damage grade value. The results show that lime-crusted rammed earth technique and tower typologies are the most vulnerable structures while topography is somehow less important. The results suggest that for half of the structures analyzed for the given scenario the probabilities are above 80% for damage grade 4 and 5 (EMS-98).
Read full abstract