Conventional research and diagnostic techniques for fuel cells and electrolyzers, such as polarization curves and EIS measurements, predominantly probe macroscopic performance characteristics. The works of Schuler, et al. [1] have given a detailed understanding of transport mechanisms inside a polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer (PEWE) by drawing extensively on such ex-situ techniques. However, these techniques cannot be used to probe in-situ behaviors of a PEWE. A need for reliable experimental data that captures in-situ spatial and temporal current distribution is the motivation for the segmented cell used here. Current distribution measurement in PEWEs was performed by Bender et al. [2, 3] while Mench and coworkers pioneered the technique in similar flowing electrochemical systems [4, 5]; a major innovation was inclusion of a printed-circuit board (PCB) with an array of shunt resistors attached to each segment as shown in Figure 1a. The advantage of this design is that, although the PCB and flow-field are segmented and electronically isolated, the other components of the cell are not. However, this design is subject to error since current can spread laterally through the porous transport layer (PTL) as it passes from the catalyst layer to the segmented flow field. Since activity at the catalyst layer is of great interest, understanding current spread is a critical step to utilizing current distribution measurements.This work focuses on characterizing the lateral current spread through PTLs. Work by Philips, Ulsh, and Bender [3], showed that the experimental setup could be modified with the help of masks to characterize lateral current spread through the PTL. A set of experiments was thus designed to investigate current spread through the porous transport layer both “inward” and “outward” from a flow field segment. The goal of these experiments is to quantify current spread, allowing correction of its contribution to obfuscating measurement of current generated in the catalyst layer. High current was detected for the PCB segment corresponding to the unmasked area as expected, but substantial current was measured around the exposed area, as well (Figure 1b). If there was zero outward current spread, no current would be measured anywhere away from the single segment area generating current. Figure 1c shows average current density as a function of radial distance from a generating spot; Figure 1d plots normalized current density as a function of radial distance. This set provides calibration for how much current spread laterally outwards as detected at points located away from a current-generating area. Similarly, inward contributions were also mapped. These experiments were also carried out for two types of PTL – Ti-foil-based thin LGDLs [6] and Ti-based felt PTLs. Preliminary observations indicate that lateral current spread in the Ti-felt-based LGDLs is less than that of the Ti-based foil LGDLs. This work quantifies the lateral current spread seen inside a LGDL and also lays the groundwork to correct current spread recorded in a spatially-resolved current distribution measurement technique. It is part of DOE project #DE-EE0008426 "Developing novel electrodes with ultralow catalyst loading for high-efficiency hydrogen production in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells." References Schuler, T., T.J. Schmidt, and F.N. Büchi, Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis: Correlating Performance and Porous Transport Layer Structure: Part II. Electrochemical Performance Analysis. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2019. 166(10): p. F555-F565. Reshetenko, T.V., et al., A segmented cell approach for studying the effects of serpentine flow field parameters on PEMFC current distribution. Electrochimica Acta, 2013. 88: p. 571-579. Phillips, A., et al., Utilizing a Segmented Fuel Cell to Study the Effects of Electrode Coating Irregularities on PEM Fuel Cell Initial Performance. Fuel Cells, 2017. 17(3): p. 288-298. Clement, J.T., D.S. Aaron, and M.M. Mench, In Situ Localized Current Distribution Measurements in All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2015. 163(1): p. A5220-A5228. Ertugrul, T.Y., et al., In-situ current distribution and mass transport analysis via strip cell architecture for a vanadium redox flow battery. Journal of Power Sources, 2019. 437: p. 226920. Mo, J., et al., Discovery of true electrochemical reactions for ultrahigh catalyst mass activity in water splitting. Science Advances, 2016. 2(11): p. e1600690. Figure 1
Read full abstract