OBJECTIVES: The aim is to compare normal and KC corneas using Pentacam keratometry, curvature indices, elevation indices, and pachymetry indices for patients aged between 6 to 21 years in the Riyadh area and analyze the indicators' sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between normal and KC corneas. METHOD: The present study employed a prospective, cross-sectional, observational, multicenter design to gather data from patients aged 6 to 21 who were seen in several non-ophthalmic emergency departments in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in 2017. Scheimpflug corneal tomography system in rotation was used to measure the cornea. Following optometric exams, corneal imaging and KC index measurements were performed using the Pentacam. RESULTS: Between the normal and KC groups, the majority of variables showed noteworthy statistical differences (p < 0.001). The most effective indicators for keratoconus discrimination were K Max, ISV, and IHD. K Max, ISV, and IHD each had an area under the curve of 0.94, 0.90, and 0.93. IHA, IHD, and in the paired study of the ROC curves, CKI indices performed significantly better than the other topometric variables. (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, when comparing the ROC curves with ISV, IVA, and KI pairwise, there are no statistically significant variations. Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC for display TP in the pairwise comparison was smaller than that of Pachy apex (p 0.002). PPI max, ART average, and TP all had larger areas under the curves than TP (p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Pentacam indices are vital to the diagnosis of KC. K Max, ISV, and IHD are the best diagnostic indices for KC. Yet, using a combination of indices is advised to improve the diagnosis and accuracy of Pentacam indices to differentiate KC from normal.
Read full abstract