Stem Revision Research Articles

Stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: retrospective investigation of a short stem using a simple measurement approach

BackgroundUncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful treatment for advanced hip joint diseases. More recently, short stems became increasingly popular, but stem subsidence remains a concern. This study investigates early short stem subsidence in a large patient cohort using a simple measurement approach for everyday practice.MethodsThis retrospective, single center, single implant design study included 1000 patients with primary THA. Subsidence was evaluated using standardized weight-bearing radiographs taken 3–5 days and 2–3 weeks postoperatively with full weight-bearing (FWB). A novel Subsidence Index (SID) was introduced to quantify stem subsidence in a simple and reproducible manner. The SID is calculated by averaging four distinct linear measurements between defined anatomical landmarks on the femur and the implant, captured on standard radiographs without additional software.ResultsOut of all analyzed patients 6% (60/1000) had subsidence of more than 3 mm. The mean subsidence was 1.3 mm (range, 0 to 16.25 mm).There were 0.6% (6) who underwent stem revision for symptomatic subsidence. Men and obese patients had greater subsidence. However, patient age, BMI, stems without lateral bone contact and other demographic factors were not associated with subsidence.ConclusionEarly subsidence is relatively frequent with this uncemented short stem, however revisions are rare. Patients with risk factors should be counseled regarding FWB and radiographic controls should be performed. The SID provides an easy, non-invasive and inexpensive tool for early subsidence assessment; however, its simplicity limits its accuracy. Further research is needed in comparison to more elaborate methods.

Modular Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Three-Step Technique

Background: Complications such as periprosthetic fractures necessitate challenging revision surgeries. In particular, femoral stem revisions can be complicated by poor bone quality, making primary stability and leg length restoration difficult to achieve. Modular fluted tapered stems (MFTSs) have emerged as a viable option for these complex cases. This study aims to describe a reproducible three-step technique for femoral stem revision using MFTSs. The technique focuses on (1) obtaining distal primary stability, (2) restoring leg length, and (3) ensuring overall implant stability. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of ten patients who underwent revision THA using this three-step technique, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The mean patient age was 70.7 years, and the average follow-up was 24.2 months. Limits were the small sample size, the lack of clinical outcomes and the short-term follow-up. Results: There was no subsidence, a mean leg length discrepancy of 4 mm (p: 0.604), and no dislocations. However, heterotopic ossifications (HOs) were observed in 25% of patients, although no trochanteric migrations occurred. One patient experienced an intraoperative femoral fracture, which was successfully treated. Conclusions: This three-step approach can break down the revision procedure, making it more accessible to surgeons. The findings suggest that this technique is effective in achieving reliable outcomes in femoral stem revisions, potentially improving the standard of care for patients requiring complex THA revisions.

Mid-term outcomes of compaction autologous bone grafting in uncemented primary total hip replacement stems

IntroductionFixation and long-term stability of collared, uncemented stems, such as the CORAIL® collared stem, in total hip arthroplasty (THA), depend on a strong cancellous bone sleeve and subsequent osseointegration. This study aimed to investigate bone reaction and mid-term outcomes following compaction autologous bone grafting in uncemented stems in primary THA.Materials and methodsThis study retrospectively reviewed patients with primary THA using CORAIL® collared stem and having ≥ 5 years follow-up. Patients were divided into the bone graft and control groups based on the use of compaction autologous bone grafting. Demographic characteristics, fracture risk, operation time, complications, revisions, and radiologic measures, such as stress shielding and reactive lines were compared between the groups.ResultsA total of 140 cases (85% women, mean age: 63 years, mean follow-up: 72 months) were included. Autologous bone graft was used in 32 (23%) cases. No significant differences in terms of age, sex, diagnoses, follow-up duration, or operation time were observed between the groups. Stress shielding frequency remained stable at 9.4% between 1y and 5y in the bone graft group, but increased from 13.9 to 28.7% in the control group, resulting in the latter having a higher 5-y frequency than the bone graft group (p = 0.0004). Reactive lines increased from 1y to 5y in both groups (bone graft: 6.3–37.5%, p = 0.0015; control: 4.6–26.9%, p < 0.001) with no significant differences between groups. There were no instances of stem subsidence/loosening or stem revision in either group.ConclusionsAutologous compaction bone grafting achieved satisfactory fixation of the uncemented CORAIL® collared stem without requiring distal fixation and mitigated stress shielding. Larger, prospective studies with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm the clinical implications of these mid-term results in primary THA.

Long-term outcomes with a partial neck-preserving cementless short stem in primary total hip arthroplasty for young patients: a single center first one hundred cases.

This study aimed to assess the long-term results of THA patients who received a cementless short stem regarding clinical outcomes, bone changes, complications, and incidence of femoral revision. A retrospective evaluation of the first 100 THA employing a type 2B cementless stem (Mini hip stem, Corin, Cirencester, United Kingdom) by the same surgeon at one institution. We only include patients with 18 years or more, and with a minimum follow up of 8 years. Patient's Harris hip score (HHS), the University of California, Los Angeles activity score (UCLA), and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. A total of 100 primary hip arthroplasties with Mini Hip stems were performed on 84 patients, with an average age of 47 years old. The median follow-up was 120 months (IQR 57.5-136.5), with 47 patients having a minimum 10-year follow-up. The patient's HHS improved significantly (p < 0.001) and UCLA's score was 7 (SD 1.7) at the final follow-up. Only one patient suffered an intraoperative lateral cortical perforation, which was treated on the same day with revision of the short stem to a conventional metaphysodiaphyseal fixation stem. Three incomplete fractures of the calcar occurred intraoperative, of which only one required wire cerclage and unloading partial during the 30 days after surgery. No osteolysis, radiolucency, thigh pain, periprosthetic or ceramic fractures were observed. Only 6% hips experience squeaking without the need for revision. Two acetabular components were revised early, but no stem failures were recorded, yielding an incidence density rate of 0% (95% CI 0-0.05%) over 10 years. This study showed that the MiniHip short stem is a reliable option for THA in younger patients, with a high implant survival rate and excellent functional outcomes over the long term.

Mid- to long-term clinical and radiological assessment of a short, titanium, porous plasma-splayed flat-tapered cementless femoral stem: An 8- to 12-year follow-up study.

Short cementless stems offer advantages such as bone-stock preservation and minimally invasive insertion. Despite encouraging short- to midterm outcomes, the long-term clinical and radiological implications of short, titanium, and porous plasma-sprayed flat-tapered stems remain unclear. A retrospective review of 138 primary total hip arthroplasties, conducted between 2010 and 2015 in 130 patients, with a minimum 8-year follow-up was performed. Patients with Dorr type A or B femora were included. Clinical and radiographic results, complications, and survival rates were evaluated. A total of 102 hips (94 patients) were reviewed with complete clinical and radiographic data at a minimum 8-year follow-up (mean, 9.5 years). The modified Harris hip score significantly improved from a mean preoperative value of 40.1 to 97.8 at the final follow-up, with 91% of the hips achieving a score of ≥ 90. In the original cohort of 138 hips, none underwent revision surgery for symptomatic loosening. Perioperative complications occurred in eight hips, including femoral fractures, postoperative dislocation, subcutaneous abscess, and transient thigh pain. Radiographically, femoral stem alignment was predominantly neutral in 86% of the hips in the anteroposterior plane. No hip exhibited radiolucency > 1mm, and no subsidence > 2mm was observed. Bone ingrowth fixation was observed in all 102 hips. Stress shielding around or below the lesser trochanter occurred in 58% of hips. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a 100% survival rate at eight, 10, and 12 years for stem revision or radiological instability. The short, titanium, porous, plasma-sprayed, flat-tapered cementless stem exhibited excellent mid- to long-term results in primary total hip arthroplasties with Dorr type A or B femora, comparable with those of other short cementless and standard-length stems. Noteworthy survivorship was observed; however, caution is advised regarding stress-shielding complications, particularly periprosthetic femoral fractures, during extended follow-up.

[Artículo traducido] Análisis retrospectivo de supervivencia del uso de vástagos modulares cónicos no cementados para la revisión en fracturas periprotésicas tipo B de Vancouver. ¿Es la inestabilidad una amenaza para la supervivencia?

Introduction and objectivesPeriprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival. Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis. ResultsThirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7–10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0–5.42) (p<0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (p=0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (p=0.044). ConclusionSurvivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.

Resultados clínicos y radiológicos del vástago SL-Plus con un seguimiento mínimo de 10 años: un estudio retrospectivo

PurposeThe SL-Plus cementless stem was introduced in 1993 as an evolution of the Alloclassic® stem with some modifications. The aim of this study was to analyse if these modifications have any influence in clinical and radiological outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. MethodsSixty-eight consecutive implants (64 patients) were retrospective evaluated. The mean duration of clinical and radiographic follow-up was 12.2 years. There were 41 female and 23 male patients with a median age of 73.5 years. All complications and reinterventions were collected. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Radiographs were evaluated immediately after the operation, after a minimum 2-year follow-up and by the end of follow-up (time A, B and C, respectively). ResultsTwo stems were revised, one due to periprosthetic fracture and one due to aseptic loosening with a cumulative probability of not having a stem revision for any reason of 97.2% at 12.2 years. Mean mHHS was 76.7 points at the latest follow-up. Significant differences were found in distal migration (time A: 5.9mm±6.7; B: 6.9mm±7.1 and C: 8.2mm±6.3; P=.000) and varus angulation (time A: 0.0°±2: B: 0.0°±2 and C: 1.0°±3; P<.001), although these stems showed radiographic signs of osseointegration. Thirty-three hips (48.5%) showed any radiolucent line around the stem, most of them located the proximal femur (Gruen 1 and 7). Multivariate regression analysis showed lower mHHS scores in older patients (P=.004) and female (P=.00). ConclusionsThe modifications of the SL-Plus stem influence the long-term outcome of the implant regarding radiological results, particularly in progressive varus angulation and distal migration. However, our study has not been able to demonstrate any clinical repercussions: functional scores and survival free of all cause revision were favorable and comparable to previous reports.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Long Cementless Monobloc Stem for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Chronic Periprosthetic Infection

BackgroundA long cementless monobloc stem is widely used for aseptic loosening, with satisfactory 5- to-10-year outcomes reported. Nonetheless, related studies on chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are scant. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the stem in 2-stage revisions due to PJI. MethodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study consisted of patients from three medical centers who were enrolled in a single arm from January 2017 to May 2022. All patients were diagnosed with chronic PJI based on the International Consensus Meeting criteria and underwent 2-stage revisions using a long monobloc cementless revision stem. Among 44 patients, 37 (12 women and 25 men) completed an average follow-up of 35.6 months (range, 14 to 75). The primary outcome was the stability of the stem; secondary outcomes included infection eradication, Harris Hip Score, leg length discrepancy, major complications, and isolated pathogens at intraoperative cultures. ResultsAt 1 year after revision, the infection-free prosthesis survival rate was 97.3% (95% confidence interval: 96.4 to 98.2). At the last follow-up, the mean subsidence was 2.9 ± 2.1 mm (range, 0.8 to 4.8). Postoperative leg length discrepancy averaged −4.6 ± 4.9 mm (range, −16 to 0). The Engh score averaged 14.1 ± 6.9 (range, zero to 22). The Harris Hip Score improved from a preoperative average of 35.7 ± 8.5 (range, 12 to 50) to 80.4 ± 9.3 (range, 58 to 92) at the 1-year postoperative follow-up (P < 0.01). ConclusionsThe long cementless monobloc stem used in the current study presents a feasible option for 2-stage revision in cases of chronic PJI. The bone ingrowth and stability could be observed within the short follow-up time. Level of evidenceLevel IV, prospective cohort study.

Single-Taper Conical Tapered Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Long-Term Registry Evaluation.

Background/Objectives: Single-taper conical tapered stems (STCTSs) are possible options for femoral reconstruction in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis, but outcomes are poorly ascertained. A specific STCTS in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis was investigated and compared to a control group including all the other cementless stems, aiming to assess the following: (1) the survival rates of the two cohorts and the hazard ratios for failure; (2) the survival rates and the hazard ratios for failures for stem failure, stem aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture. Methods: A regional arthroplasty registry study evaluating a specific STCTS in THA performed for primary osteoarthritis was designed. A control group including all the other cementless stems was considered. Results: In total, 1773 STCTSs were compared to 37,944 cementless stems. The cumulative survivorship of the STCTS cohort was 95.6% at 10 years and 92.7% at 15 years, which was not different to the control group (p = 0.252). After age stratification, the hazard ratio for STCTS failure was not different to the control group. With stem revision as the endpoint, the STCTS cohort outperformed the control group (at 10 years, 98% versus 96.8%; p < 0.001). The STCTSs achieved better survival rates in females <65 years (p = 0.023). With stem aseptic loosening as the endpoint, the survival rates did not differ between the two cohorts (p = 0.085), as well as the adjusted hazard ratios (p = 0.264). With periprosthetic fracture as the endpoint, the survival rates were better for the STCTSs (p < 0.001). Conclusions: STCTSs in THA for primary osteoarthritis provided dependable long-term outcomes, not inferior to all the other cementless stems with various designs.

Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Does Not Compromise Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Stem Revisions with the Use of an Uncemented Modular Conical Stem.

Background: Stem revisions in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with proximal bone stock loss may be dealt with utilizing modular, uncemented conical stems. During stem extraction, surgeons may resort to extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO). However, ETO is associated with extensive blood loss and infections. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiographic results and complications in THA revisions utilizing conical modular stem with and without ETO. Methods: Patients who underwent revision THA with or without ETO were assessed retrospectively. The minimal follow-up was 3 years. The functional evaluation included Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36) as well as Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Numerical Rating Scale for pain assessment. The radiographic evaluation comprised bone defect assessment, osteotomy healing, stem migration and position, presence of radiolucent lines and stress shielding. Results: In total, 73 patients (80 hips) were included in the final analysis. The ETO group comprised 48 hips, and the no-ETO group comprised 32 hips. In the ETO group, pre-operative WOMAC scores were lower than in the no-ETO group (p = 0.012). No significant differences were found in terms of post-operative HHS, WOMAC, and NRS scores between groups, except worse results were found in the case of claw plate implantation. Patients in the no-ETO group exhibited better results in SF-36 than in the ETO-group. Osteotomy non-union was observed in four hips (9.5%). Stam varus/valgus position was within ±1.5 degrees (85.9%). Conclusions: ETO does not adversely impact outcomes in patients undergoing femoral stem revisions with modular conical stems. The invasive nature of these procedures prompts careful consideration in each case individually.

Does Femoral Stem Design Influence Periprosthetic Fracture Incidence and Morphology in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundAs the incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases, the number of periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) will also rise. The surgical approach and stem design have been shown to influence the rate of PFF. This study evaluated PFF in cementless THA done through the posterior approach and described how stem design influences intraoperative and early postoperative fracture incidence and morphology. MethodsA retrospective review of 3,183 primary THAs for osteoarthritis from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Demographics, comorbidities, femoral stem designs, intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs (< 90 days), and aseptic femoral revisions were recorded. Stems were classified as single-wedge taper (Type 1), double-wedge taper (Type 2), or ream and broach (Type 3). There were 1,192 Type 1, 240 Type 2, and 1,726 Type 3 femoral stems. The PFF and aseptic femoral revisions were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses evaluated survival to femoral revision. ResultsIn this population, 25 patients (0.8%) had an intraoperative or early postoperative PFF. Patients who had PFFs were older (68 versus 63; P = 0.03) and more likely to be women (76 versus 24%; P = 0.02). Type 2 stems had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause PFFs when compared to Type 1 (3.6 versus 0.7%; P < 0.01) and Type 3 (3.6 versus 0.4%; P < 0.01) stems. Type 2 stems also had a higher incidence of Vancouver B2 PFFs when compared to Type 3 stems (0.8 versus 0.05%; P = 0.04). Stem design was not associated with PFF or all-cause femoral revision. There were no differences in survival to femoral revision. ConclusionsDouble-wedge taper stems may be associated with increased intraoperative and early postoperative PFFs, including those requiring femoral stem revision. However, there was no statistically significant difference in late PFF, aseptic loosening, or femoral revision.

Mid-Term Migration Pattern of a Cemented Collared Anatomical Stem-A Retrospective Study Using EBRA-FCA.

Background: Aseptic loosening is one of the leading causes of stem revision. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis allows for the detection of distal stem migration, which is used as a predictive factor for implant longevity. This study aims to demonstrate the migration behavior of a cemented collared anatomical stem. Methods: This study retrospectively examined all patients who received a cemented Lubinus SP II stem (Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) between 2003 and 2019. We used the EBRA-FCA software (University of Innsbruck, Austria) to determine the migration patterns and thoroughly examined the patients' medical histories. In addition, the potential influence of femoral configuration and BMI on the migration behavior was assessed. Results: This study included 61 patients (48 females and 13 males) with a total of 61 stems that met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 76 years (ranging from 30 to 93 years). According to EBRA-FCA migration analysis, a median subsidence of 0.7 mm was observed at 24 months and at the final follow-up (median 78 months). Distal stem migration was significantly higher at the 6-month time point in patients with Dorr type A femurs compared to Dorr type B femurs (p = 0.016). Body mass index (BMI) had no significant effect on stem migration. Conclusions: The measured subsidence of the Lubinus SP 2 stem using EBRA-FCA was below established thresholds, indicating excellent long-term outcomes. Although there was significantly increased subsidence in Dorr type A femurs during the initial 6 months, thereafter, no statistically significant difference was observed compared to Dorr type B femurs.

The Wagner Cone Stem for Atypical Femoral Anatomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Report of 320 Cases with Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

The Wagner Cone Prosthesis was designed to address complex femoral deformities during total hip arthroplasty (THA), but its mid-term component survivorship and functional outcomes remain undetermined. The objectives of this study were to determine the implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, osseointegration as seen radiographically, implant subsidence, and complications of THA using the Wagner Cone Prosthesis stem at intermediate-term follow-up. This study involved 302 patients with proximal femoral deformities, including developmental hip dysplasia and Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, who underwent a total of 320 primary THAs using the Wagner Cone Prosthesis. The average age at the time of surgery was 49.4 ± 14.5 years (range, 18.8 to 85.6 years). Patient satisfaction was recorded using a self-administered questionnaire assessing satisfaction in 4 domains. The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), radiographic outcomes, and complications were recorded. The mean follow-up time was 10.1 years (range, 5.2 to 15.5 years). Survivorship of the Wagner Cone Prosthesis was 98.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 97.2% to 100%) with stem revision as the end point and 95.8% (95% CI: 93.5% to 98.2%) with reoperation for any reason as the end point at 10 years postoperatively. In total, 3 stems were revised: 2 for infection and 1 for chronic hip dislocation. The median patient satisfaction score was 95 (interquartile range [IQR], 80 to 100), median UCLA score was 6 (IQR, 6 to 7), median WOMAC score was 18 (IQR, 16 to 22), median OHS was 40 (IQR, 36 to 47), and median FJS was 80 (IQR, 76 to 88) at the time of final follow-up. All Wagner Cone stems that were not revised showed radiographic evidence of osseointegration, with a mean stem subsidence of 0.9 ± 0.8 mm at the most recent follow-up. The use of the Wagner Cone Prosthesis stem in patients with complex femoral anatomy undergoing primary THA is associated with excellent component survivorship, high levels of patient satisfaction, good functional outcomes, and reliable osseointegration with minimal stem subsidence as seen on radiographs at intermediate-term follow-up. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

COMPARISON OF SURVIVAL RATES AND ANALYSIS OF FIRST-TIME STEM REVISION OF SHORT-STEMMED AND NORMAL-STEMMED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTIES BASED ON 16,258 SHORT STEMS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN, DUTCH, AND SWEDISH REGISTRIES

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) may have bone sparing properties, which could be advantageous in a younger population with high risk of future revision surgery. We used data from the AOANJRR, LROI and SAR to compare survival rates of primary THA, stems used in the first-time revision procedures as well as the overall survival of first-time revisions between a cohort of short-stem and standard-stem THA.Short-stem THAs (designed as a short stem with mainly metaphyseal fixation) between 2007 and 2021 were identified (n=16,258). A propensity score matched cohort (1:2) with standard THAs in each register was identified (n=32,515). The cohorts were merged into a research dataset. Overall survival at 12 years follow-up was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Stem revisions (short-stem THA n=239, standard-stem THA n=352) were identified. The type of revision stem was classified as standard (&lt;160 mm) or long (&gt;160 mm). The survival rate of all first-time revisions in the two groups was calculated using any type of revision as outcome.The 12 year- overall survival rate (all revisions, all causes) for primary short-stem THAs was 95.3% (CI 94.5–95.9%), which was comparable to 95.2% (CI 94.7–95.7%) for standard-stem THAs. In the short-stem THA group, a standard stem (&lt;160 mm) was more often (59%) used in the first-time revision than in the standard-stem group (47%, p=0.004). The overall survival of the first-time revisions did not differ between cases primarily operated with a short or a standard stem.In our multi-national register study, the overall survival rate of short stems was similar to that of standard stems. In short stem revisions there was a higher likelihood of using a standard-length stem for the revision compared with first-time revisions of standard stems. This finding might indicate bone-sparing properties with short-stemmed THAs.

The resisted torsional stress test in diagnosis of femoral stem loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty - first description and retrospective study.

Aseptic femoral stem loosening is among the most common causes for revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We describe a simple clinical test that triggers pain in the proximal femur in patients with a loose stem. A previously described passive rotation test was associated with a poor sensitivity. The resisted torsional stress test (RTST) was used for several years in our hospital, and this is the first description of its reliability. We retrospectively reviewed our database of uncemented stem revisions. Preoperative clinical reports were searched for data on the RTST. A positive RTST was defined as sharp pain felt at the stem level with active internal rotation against a passive external rotation impulse in 90° hip flexion. The definition of stem fixation (fixed vs. loose) was made by readout of the surgery reports. The RTST was reported in 83 cases and was positive in 32 of the 43 stems, which were found loose intraoperatively and in 9 of the 40 stems, which were well integrated. This leads to an accuracy of classification of 79.5%. The sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 79.1%. PPV and NPV were 78% and 81%, respectively. The RTST provides a helpful tool in the clinical assessment of femoral stem fixation in THA with good accuracy and should be included in standard follow-up examinations and in the assessment of painful THAs.

Comparative analysis of femoral bone loss: uncemented vs. cemented aseptic stem loosening in first-time revision surgery—a retrospective evaluation of 215 patients

IntroductionThe integrity of the femoral bone is crucial when considering reconstructive options for the first-time revision of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Aseptic loosening of primary stems, whether cemented or uncemented, significantly affects the volume and quality of resultant femoral bone loss. This study evaluates the impact of the initial fixation method on femoral bone defect patterns by comparing the extent of bone loss.Materials and methodsA retrospective cohort of 215 patients with either cemented or uncemented stems, indicated for aseptic stem loosening, and undergoing first-time stem revision from 2010 to 2022 at our institution was analyzed. Femoral bone loss extent at first-time revision was preoperatively gauged using radiographs and categorized by the Paprosky classification. Survival probabilities pre-first-time revision for both stem types were calculated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Hazard ratios were applied to compare the risk of initial revision for uncemented versus cemented stems within the first and subsequent 2nd to 10th years post-primary implantation.ResultsCemented stems were associated with a higher occurrence of significant bone defects of type 3a (23.53% vs. 14.02%, p = .108), 3b (39.22% vs. 1.22%, p < .001), and 4 (3.92% vs. 0.00%) compared to uncemented stems. Conversely, smaller defects of type 1 and 2 were more prevalent in uncemented stem loosening (84.76% vs. 33.33%, p < .001). Notably, cemented stems exhibited a significantly prolonged revision-free period over the complete decade following primary insertion (p < .001). The unadjusted risk of first-time revision due to stem loosening showed a tendency to an increase in uncemented stems within the initial postoperative year (HR 5.55, 95% CI 0.74; 41.67, p = .096), and an adjusted risk of 2.1 (95% CI 0.26; 16.53, p = .488). However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. In the subsequent 2nd-10th years, the risk was lower compared to cemented stems (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.39; 3.99, p = .002).ConclusionsUncemented primary stems necessitating first-time revision due to aseptic loosening demonstrated notably smaller femoral bone defects in comparison to primary cemented stems.

Clinical outcomes and survival rates of a uncemented modular revision stem system in hip arthroplasty: a 10-year single-institution study on a frail population

IntroductionThe increasing prevalence of primary hip arthroplasty has led to a parallel rise in revision cases. Femoral revision often entails compromised bone integrity, requiring consideration of various solutions for optimal reconstructive options. Despite technological advancements, there is limited evidence on the clinical outcomes of the latest modular revision stems. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survival rates of next generation uncemented modular revision stem in patients undergoing hip revision surgery.Materials and methodsThis retrospective single-center study assessed the survival and failure causes of a specific uncemented modular stem in 48 patients undergoing hip revision surgery between 2012 and 2022. Data included preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes measured through clinical and radiographic assessments. Forty-eight patients (25 males, 23 females; mean age 72 years) were included, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5. Preoperative diagnoses varied, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) being the most common (45.8%), followed by periprosthetic fractures (27.1%). Partial revisions occurred in 60.4%, total revisions in 39.6%. According to Paprosky classification of femoral bone loss, type II and III were the most represented, respectively 35.4% and 50%.ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, stem survival was 92.5%. Complications (20%) included dislocation, PJI, fracture, and loosening; the overall reoperation rate was 12.5%. The SF-12 physical score was 43.6, while the mental score was 51.1. The HOOS score was 71.8, and the HHS score was 71.4. Radiographic analysis identified nonprogressive osteolysis in 15.1% of patients.ConclusionsThis study on this uncemented modular revision stem demonstrated favorable outcomes in an elder fragile population with moderate to severe femoral bone loss. The implant’s modularity provides versatility in addressing various defects, without any implant breakage observed during the study period. Literature comparison highlighted similar outcomes despite sample size differences. The promising results warrant continued investigation into the long-term survivorship of this modular stem system.

Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Older Patients With Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Comparison Between Cemented and Cementless Stem Revisions

BackgroundEarly postoperative functional recovery is important in older patients with lower-extremity fractures to prevent disuse, and periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are no exception. This study aimed to compare the postoperative functional recovery in the early phase after revision for PFF with loose stems between cemented and cementless stems. MethodsEighteen patients with Unified Classification System type B2 PFF were included in this retrospective cohort study with a follow-up period of about 2 years. All patients underwent stem revision and were divided into 2 groups: the cemented stem group (n = 9) and the cementless stem group (n = 9). In postrevision, functional independence measure score, independent walk rate, activities of daily living recovery rate to the original level at 2 weeks postoperatively, the Beals and Tower classification for radiological status, and survival rate for readmission as endpoints were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsPatients in the cemented group recovered functional mobility earlier than in the cementless group, with higher postoperative functional independence measure functional subscale values (73 vs 50 points, P = .02), higher independent walk rate (89 vs 11%, P < .01), and more postoperative activities of daily living recovery (100% vs 44%, P = .03) at 2 weeks postoperatively. The Beals and Tower classification and survival rates were similar in both groups. ConclusionsRevision using a cemented stem for PFF in older patients was a useful surgical procedure in terms of early postoperative functional recovery. Cemented stem revision was comparable with cementless in bone union and safety at 2 years postoperatively.

Comparative outcomes of uncemented and cemented stem revision in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective cohort study

IntroductionPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) following hip arthroplasty, especially Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, present a challenge due to the association with a loose femoral stem, necessitating either open reduction and internal fixation or stem revision. This study aims to compare outcomes between uncemented and cemented stem revisions in managing Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, considering factors such as hip-related complications, reoperations, and clinical outcome.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at Danderyd Hospital, Sweden, from 2008 to 2022, encompassing operatively treated Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures. Patients were categorized into uncemented and cemented stem revision groups, with data collected on complications, revision surgeries, fracture healing times, and clinical outcomes.ResultsA total of 241 patients were identified. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in patient demographics, with the cemented group comprising older patients and more females. Follow up ranged from 1 to 15 years. Average follow up time was 3.9 years for the cemented group and 5.5 years for the uncemented group. The cemented stems demonstrated lower rates of dislocation (8.9% versus 22.5%, P = 0.004) and stem loosening (0.6% versus 9.3%, P = 0.004) than the uncemented method. Moreover, the cemented group exhibited shorter fracture healing times (11.4 weeks versus 16.7 weeks, P = 0.034). There was no difference in clinical outcome between groups. Mortality was higher in the cemented group.ConclusionsThis retrospective study indicates that cemented stem revision for Vancouver B2–3 fractures is correlated with lower dislocation and stem loosening rates, necessitating fewer reoperations and shorter fracture healing times compared with the uncemented approach. The cemented group had a notably higher mortality rate, urging caution in its clinical interpretation.Level of evidence III

Analysis of Postoperative Complication and Revision Rates and Mid- to Long-Term Implant Survival in Primary Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background/Objectives: Short-stem prostheses were introduced as an alternative to conventional straight-stem prostheses. Despite their benefits, including minimally invasive approaches, soft-tissue- and bone-sparing implantation, and physiological load transfer to the metaphysis, data on postoperative complication and revision rates as well as on implant survival are scarce. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1327 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Metha® short stem between 2006 and 2023 was conducted. Complication and revision rates were analysed for the intraoperative, direct postoperative, and follow-up episodes. Implant survival was analysed with the endpoint of all-cause stem revision. Results: Intraoperative complications were observed in 3.77% of the cases and included 44 hairline cracks and 6 fractures. In 15 cases (30.0%), conversion to a straight-stem or revision implant was necessary. The direct postoperative complication rate was 2.44%, and 11 revision procedures were performed during inpatient stay (0.84%). Mean follow-up was 7 years (range 1-17). During follow-up, femoral component revision was performed in 60 cases. Aseptic loosening and stem subsidence accounted for a combined percentage of 80% of all indications. Implant survival rate was 95.66% after 5 years, 95.58% after 10 years, and 95.50% after 15 years. Conclusions: Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of postoperative complication and revision rates in a large sample undergoing primary short-stem THA. Postoperative complication rates were favourable, and the long-term implant survival rates were comparable to conventional straight-stem prostheses. Therefore, short-stem THA may be considered an alternative for younger patients.